Investigation of the Relationship between Myopia and Intelligence in a Sample of Undergraduate Students

DOI: 10.4236/nm.2011.24041   PDF   HTML     5,483 Downloads   10,650 Views   Citations


In a sample of undergraduate students, myopia was associated with higher Math and Total SAT score, and males had higher Math and Total SAT scores than females. The association between myopia and higher Math and Total SAT scores was significant only among males, and the gender differences in Math and Total SAT scores were significant only among allergic participants. There were also significant associations between ethnicity and both myopia and SAT scores, but regression analyses revealed that ethnicity, gender, and myopia each made significant independent contributions to Math SAT scores. The findings provide support for Storfer’s theory of myopia and brain growth.

Share and Cite:

M. Kelley, "Investigation of the Relationship between Myopia and Intelligence in a Sample of Undergraduate Students," Neuroscience and Medicine, Vol. 2 No. 4, 2011, pp. 313-317. doi: 10.4236/nm.2011.24041.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.


[1] M. Storfer, “Myopia, Intelligence, and the Expanding Human Neocortex: Behavioral Influences and Evolutionary Implications,” International Journal of Neuroscience, Vol. 98, No. 3-4, 1999, pp. 153-276. doi:10.3109/00207459908997465
[2] E. B. Dunphy, M. R. Stoll and S. H. King, “Myopia among American Male Graduate Students,” American Journal of Opthalmology, Vol. 65, No. 4, 1968, pp. 518- 521.
[3] E. Goldschmidt, “On the Etiology of Myopia: An Epidemiological Study,” Acta Opthalmologica, Vol. 98, 1968, pp. 1-172.
[4] R. W. Parnell, “Sight of Undergraduates,” British Journal of Opthalmology, Vol. 35, 1951, pp. 467-472. doi:10.1136/bjo.35.8.467
[5] J. Wallman, “Nature and Nurture of Myopia,” Nature, Vol. 371, No. 2, 1994, pp. 01-202. doi:10.1038/371201a0
[6] C. P. Benbow and R. M. Benbow, “Biological Correlates of High Mathematical Reasoning Ability,” Progress in Brain Research, Vol. 61, 1984, pp. 469-490. doi:10.1016/S0079-6123(08)64455-6
[7] C. P. Benbow and R. M. Benbow, “Physiological Correlates of Extreme Intellectual Precocity,” Mensa Research Journal, Vol. 21, 1986, pp. 54-87.
[8] C. P. Benbow, “Possible Biological Correlates of Precocious Mathematical Reasoning Ability,” Trends in Neuroscience, Vol. 10, 1987, pp. 17-20. doi:10.1016/0166-2236(87)90117-2
[9] M. D. Storfer, “We, the Gifted: Prevalence of Childhood Myopia and Allergies in a High-IQ Population,” Mensa Bulletin, Vol. 382, December 1994, p. 11.
[10] M. D. Storfer, “Intelligence and Giftedness: The Contributions of Heredity & Early Environment,” Jossey-Bass, San Francisco & Oxford, 1990.
[11] W. R. Baldwin, “A Review of Statistical Studies of Relations between Myopia and Ethnic, Behavioral, and Physiological Characteristics,” American Journal of Optometry & Physiological Optics, Vol. 58, No. 7, 1981, pp. 516-527.
[12] D. Kantor, “Racial Aspects of Myopia in Compositors,” British Journal of Opthalmology, Vol. 16, 1932, pp. 49-50.
[13] R. H. Post, “Population Differences in Visual Acuity: A Review, with Speculative Notes on Selection Relaxation,” Eugenics Quarterly, Vol. 9, 1962, pp. 189-212.
[14] M. Rosner and M. Belkin, “Intelligence, Education, and Myopia in Males,” Archives of Opthalmology, Vol. 105, 1987, pp. 1508-1511.
[15] M. Dirani, X., Zhang, L. K. Goh, T. L. Young, P. Lee and S. M. Saw, “The Role of Vision in Academic School Performance,” Ophthalmic Epidemiology, Vol. 17, No. 1, 2010, pp. 18-24. doi:10.3109/09286580903450320
[16] C. P. Benbow, “Sex Differences in Mathematical Reasoning Ability in Intellectually Talented Preadolescents: Their Nature, Effects, and Possible Causes,” Behavioural and Brain Sciences, Vol. 11, 1988, pp. 169-232. doi:10.1017/S0140525X00049244
[17] J. S. Hyde and M. C. Linn, “Gender Differences in Verbal Ability: A Meta-Analysis,” Psychological Bulletin, Vol. 104, No. 1, 1988, pp. 53-69. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.104.1.53
[18] E. S. Johnson and A. C. Meade, “Developmental Patterns of Spatial Ability: An Early Sex Difference,” Child Development, Vol. 58, 1987, pp. 725-740. doi:10.2307/1130210
[19] M. C. Linn and A. C. Petersen, “Emergence and Characterization of Sex Differences in Spatial Ability: A Meta- Analysis,” Child Development, Vol. 56, No. 6, 1985, pp. 1479-1498. doi:10.2307/1130467
[20] E. E. Maccoby and C. N. Jacklin, “The Psychology of Sex Differences,” Stanford University Press, Stanford, 1974.
[21] D. McGuiness, “When Children Don’t Learn. Understanding the Biology and Psychology of Learning Disabilities,” Basic Books, New York, 1985.
[22] M. Reite, C. M. Cullum, J. Stocker, P. Teale and E. Kozora, “Neuropsychological Test Performance and MEG- Based Brain Lateralization: Sex Differences,” Brain Research Bulletin, Vol. 32, 1993, pp. 325-328. doi:10.1016/0361-9230(93)90195-H
[23] J. A. Sherman, “Sex-Related Cognitive Differences,” C.C.Thomas, Springfield, 1978.
[24] J. A. Sherman, “Sex Differences in Brain Function. In the brain: Recent Research and Its Implications,” College of Eucation, University of Oregon, Eugene, 1982.
[25] J. W. Van Strien and A. Bouma, “Sex and Familial Sinistrality Differences in Cognitive Abilities,” Brain and Cognition, Vol. 27, 1995, pp. 137-146. doi:10.1006/brcg.1995.1014
[26] I. M. Smith, “Spatial ability,” Robert R. Knapp, San Diego, 1964.
[27] K. Hugdahl, T. Thomsen and L. Ersland, “Sex Differences in Visuo-Spatial Processing: An fMRI Study of Mental Rotation,” Neuropsychologia, Vol. 44, No. 9, 2006, pp. 1575-1583. doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2006.01.026
[28] T. Thomsen, K. Hugdahl, L. Ersland, R. Barndon, A. Lundervold, A. I. Smievoll, B. E. Roscher and H. Sundberg, “Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging (fMRI) Study of Sex Differences in a Mental Rotation Task,” Medical Science Monitor, Vol. 6, 2000, pp. 1186-1196. doi:10.1016/j.cogbrainres.2005.08.004
[29] M. W. O’Boyle, R. Cunnington, T. J. Silk, D. Vaughan, G. Jackson, A. Syngeniotis and G. F. Egan, “Mathematically Gifted Male Adolescents Activate a Unique Brain Network during Mental Rotation,” Brain Research: Cognitive Brain Research, Vol. 25, No. 2, 2005, pp. 583-587.

comments powered by Disqus

Copyright © 2020 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc.

Creative Commons License

This work and the related PDF file are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.