Psychologists’ Diagnostic Processes during a Diagnostic Interview

Marleen Groenier, Vos R. J. Beerthuis, Jules M. Pieters, Cilia L. M Witteman, Jan A. Swinkels

.

DOI: 10.4236/psych.2011.29138                

Abstract

In mental health care, psychologists assess clients’ complaints, analyze underlying problems, and identify causes for these problems, to make treatment decisions. We present a study on psychologists’ diagnostic processes, in which a mixed-method approach was employed. We aimed to identify a common structure in the diagnostic processes of different psychologists. We engaged an actor to simulate a client. Participants were asked to perform a diagnostic interview with this “client”. This interview was videotaped. Afterwards participants first wrote a report and then were asked to review their considerations during the interview. We found that psychologists were comprehensive in their diagnostic interviews. They addressed the client’s complaints, possible classifications, explanations, and treatments. They agreed about the classifications, more than about causal factors and treatment options. The content of the considerations differed between the interviews and the reports written afterwards. We conclude that psychologists continuously shifted between diagnostic activities and revised their decisions in line with the dynamics of the interview situation.

Keywords

Clinical Decision Making, Diagnostic Interview, Stimulated Recall, Simulated Patient

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

[1]	American Psychiatric Association (2000). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (4th revised ed.). Washington, DC: Author
[2]	Brammer, R. (1997). Case conceptualization strategies: The relationship between psychologists’ experience levels, academic training, and mode of clinical inquiry. Educational Psychology Review, 9, 333-351. doi:10.1023/A:1024794522386
[3]	Bus, A. G., & Kruizenga, T. H. (1989). Diagnostic problem-solving behavior of expert practitioners in the field of learning disabilities. Journal of School Psychology, 27, 277-287. doi:10.1016/0022-4405(89)90042-3
[4]	Caspar, F. (1997). What goes on in a psychotherapist’s mind? Psychotherapy Research, 7, 105-125. doi:10.1080/10503309712331331913
[5]	De Bruyn, E. E. J., Ruijssenaars, A., Pameijer, N. K., & Van Aarle, E. J. M. (2003). The diagnostic cycle. Learning from practice. Leuven: Ac-co.
[6]	Dijkstra, W. (2002). Sequence viewer 3.0. Amsterdam: Department of Social Research Methods, Vrije Universi-teit.
[7]	Dijkstra, W., & Taris, T. (1995). Measuring the agreement between sequences. Sociological Methods & Research, 24, 214-231. doi:10.1177/0049124195024002004
[8]	Eells, T. D. (2007). Handbook of psychotherapy case formulation (2nd ed.). New York: The Guilford Press.
[9]	Eells, T. D., Kendjelic, E. M., & Lucas, C. P. (1998). What’s in a case formulation? Development and use of a content coding manual. Journal of Psychotherapy Practice and Research, 7, 144-153. http://jppr.psychiatryonline.org/
[10]	Eells, T. D., Lombart, K. G., Kendjelic, E. M., Turner, L. C., & Lucas, C. P. (2005). The quality of psychotherapy case formulations: A comparison of expert, experienced, and novice cognitive-behavioral and psychodynamic therapists. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 73, 579-589. doi:10.1037/0022-006X.73.4.579
[11]	Fernández-Ballesteros, R. (1999). Psychological assessment: Future challenges and progresses. European Psychologist, 4, 248-262. doi:10.1027//1016-9040.4.4.248
[12]	Fernández-Ballesteros, R., De Bruyn, E. E. J., Godoy, A., Hornke, L. F., Ter Laak, J., Vizcarro, C., Westhoff, K., Westmeyer, H., & Zaccagnini, J. L. (2001). Guidelines for the assessment process (GAP): A proposal for discussion. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 17, 187-200. doi:10.1027//1015-5759.17.3.187
[13]	Field, A. (2000). Discovering statistics using SPSS for windows. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications Ltd.
[14]	Garb, H. N. (1998). Studying the clinician: Judgment research and psychological assessment. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
[15]	Garb, H. N. (2005). Clinical judgment and decision making. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 1, 67-89. doi:10.1146/annurev.clinpsy.1.102803.143810
[16]	Gigerenzer, G. (2000). Adaptive thinking: Rationality in the real world. New York: Oxford University Press.
[17]	Groenier, M., Pieters, J. M., Hulshof, C. D., Wilhelm, P., & Witteman, C. L. M. (2008). Psychologists’ judgments of diagnostic activities: Deviations from a theoretical model. Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, 15, 256-265. doi:10.1002/cpp.587
[18]	Groth-Marnat, G. (2003). Handbook of psychological assessment (4th ed.). New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
[19]	Haverkamp, B. E. (1993). Confirmatory bias in hypothesis testing for client-identified and counselor self-generated hypotheses. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 40, 303-315. doi:10.1037/0022-0167.40.3.303
[20]	Haynes, S. N., Mumma, G. H., & Pinson, C. (2009). Idiographic assessment: Conceptual and psychometric foundations of individualized behavioral assessment. Clinical Psychology Review, 29, 179- 191. doi:10.1016/j.cpr.2008.12.003
[21]	Haynes, S. N., Smith, G. T., & Hunsley, J. D. (2011). Scientific foundations of clinical assessment. New York, NY: Routledge.
[22]	Hillerbrand, E. T., & Claiborn, C. D. (1990). Examining reasoning skill differences between expert and novice counselors. Journal of Counseling & Development, 68, 684-691. www.counseling.org
[23]	Kagan, N., Krathwohl, D. R., & Miller, R. (1963). Stimulated recall in therapy using video tape: A case study. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 10, 237-243. doi:10.1037/h0045497
[24]	Kuyken, W., Fothergill, C. D., Musa, M., & Chadwick, P. (2005). The reliability and quality of cognitive case formulation. Behavior Research and Therapy, 43, 1187-1201. doi:10.1016/j.brat.2004.08.007
[25]	Lichtenberg, J. W. (1997). Expertise in counseling psychology: A concept in search of support. Educational Psychology Review, 9, 221- 238. doi:10.1023/A:1024783107643
[26]	Müller, J. M. (2011). Evaluation of a therapeutic concept diagram. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 27, 17-28. doi:10.1027/1015-5759/a000053
[27]	Nelson-Gray, R. O. (2003). Treatment utility of psychological assessment. Psychological Assessment, 15, 521-531. doi:10.1037/1040-3590.15.4.521
[28]	Nezu, C. M., & Nezu A. M. (1995). Clinical decision making in everyday practice: The science in the art. Cognitive and Behavioral Practice, 2, 5-25. doi:10.1016/S1077-7229(05)80003-3
[29]	Persons, J. B. (1991). Psychotherapy outcome studies do not accurately represent current models of psychotherapy. American Psychologist, 46, 99-106. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.46.2.99
[30]	Simon, H. A. (1957). Models of man: Social and rational. New York: Wiley.
[31]	Smith, L., & Gilhooly, K. (2006). Regression versus fast and frugal models of decision-making: The case of prescribing for depression. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 20, 265-274. doi:10.1002/acp.1189
[32]	Smith, L., Gilhooly, K., & Walker, A. (2002). Factors influencing prescribing decisions in the treatment of depression: A social judgement theory approach. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 17, 51-63. doi;10.1002/acp.844
[33]	Westhoff, K., Hagemeister, C., & Strobel, A. (2007). Decision-aiding in the process of psychological assessment. Psychology Science, 49, 271-285. http://www.doaj.org/