The European Regional Integration in the IR Literature:A Review of Scholarly Support and Opposition
Agnes Katalin Koos
DOI: 10.4236/ojpp.2011.12015   PDF   HTML     5,411 Downloads   9,111 Views   Citations


Most of what has been written on the ECSC/ EEC/ EC/ EU, has not been done by international relations (IR) theorists, but by comparativists, sociologists, historians, anthropologists, legal scholars, and many others. These writings are in general classified as intergovernmentalist, federalist, and supranationalist (functionalist and neo- functionalist) in most accounts of the theoretical perspectives on the EU (Webb 1983, Rosamond 2000). Wiener and Diez 2004 add a rational choice institutional category, as well, as they think that the policy analysis within the polity developed into an autonomous brand of literature. It is only Andrew Hurrell in his chapter in Fawcett and Hurrell 1995, who makes an attempt to present the EU, as a regional integration, from the point of view of diverse IR approaches. Drawing on his classification scheme, I conduct an inquiry of the IR theories about European unification from the point of view of whether they allow for the iteration of the European experience in other parts of the world or not. The basic conclusion is that almost all IR work on Europe falls in the inter- governmentalist category, which tends to conceptualize the European Union as representing an n of 1. (Inter- governmentalism is the choice of realism and neo-realism, English School, and neoliberal institutionalism.) Within the liberal IR paradigm, there is a tension between law-focused and security-focused approaches, on the one hand, and economic approaches, on the other. The first believe in the possibility of multiple integrations, while the latter does not think that they are desirable. Critical theories are also hindered by divergent normative commitments, though the class-based theorizing is very clear about pursuing the social control of markets.

Share and Cite:

Koos, A. (2011). The European Regional Integration in the IR Literature:A Review of Scholarly Support and Opposition. Open Journal of Philosophy, 1, 90-101. doi: 10.4236/ojpp.2011.12015.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.


[1] Acharya, A. (2003). Will Asia’s Past Be Its Future? International Security, 28, 149-164. doi:10.1162/016228803773100101
[2] Adler, E., & Barnett, M. (1998). Security communities, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge and New York. doi:10.1017/CBO9780511598661
[3] Ashley, & Richard, K. (1986). The Poverty of Neorealism, in Robert O. Keohane (ed). Neorealism and Its Critics, New York: Columbia University Press.
[4] Bull, H. (1977). The Anarchical Society. London: Macmillan.
[5] Burley, A. M., & Walter, M. (1993). Europe Before the Court: A Political Theory of Legal Integration. International Organization 47, 1, 41-80. doi:10.1017/S0020818300004707
[6] Buzan, B., & Ole, W. (2003). Regions and powers: the structure of international security. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. doi:10.1017/CBO9780511491252
[7] Caporaso, J. (1996). The European Union and Forms of State: Westphalian, Regulatory or Post-Modern? Journal of Common Market Studies, 34, 29-52. doi:10.1111/j.1468-5965.1996.tb00559.x
[8] Caporaso, J. A. (2005). The Possibilities of a European Identity, Brown Journal of World Affairs, 12, 65-75.
[9] Caporaso, J., Gary, M., Andrew, M., & Mark, A. P. (1997). Does the European Union represent an n of 1? ECSA Review, 10, 1-5.
[10] Charillon, F. (2005). The EU as a security regime. European Foreign Affairs Review, 10, 517-533.
[11] Cox, R. W. (1986). Social Forces, States and World Orders: Beyond International Relations Theory, in Robert O. K. (ed.). Neorealism and Its Critics, New York: Columbia University Press.
[12] Doyle, M. W. (1986). Liberalism and World Politics Revisited, in Charles W. K. (ed.). Controversies in International Relations Theory, New York: St. Martin’s Press, 1996, 83-106.
[13] Enloe, C. (2000). Maneuvers: The International Politics of Militarizing Women’s Lives. London: University of California Press.
[14] Farrell, M., Bjorn, H., & Luk, V. L. (eds.). (2005). Global Politics of Regionalism: Theory and Practice. Pluto Press.
[15] Fawcett, L., & Andrew, H. (eds.). (1995). Regionalism in World Politics: Regional Organization and International Order. Oxford/NY: Oxford University Press.
[16] Garrett, G., & George, T. (1996). An Institutional Critique of Intergovernmentalism. International Organization, 50, 269-99. doi:10.1017/S0020818300028563
[17] Grieco, J. M. (1988). Anarchy and the limits of cooperation: A realist critique of the newest liberal institutionalism. International Organization, 42, 485-507. doi:10.1017/S0020818300027715
[18] Grieco, J. M. (1995). The Maastricht treaty, economic and monetary union and the neo-realist research programme. Review of International Studies, 21, 21-40. doi:10.1017/S0260210500117504
[19] Grieco, J. M. (1996). State interests and international rule trajecto-ries: A neo-realist interpretation of the Maastricht Treaty and Economic and Monetary Union in Europe. Security Studies, 6, 176-222.
[20] Haas, E. B. (1964). Beyond the Nation-state. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
[21] Haas, E. B. (1976). Turbulent fields and the theory of regional integration. International Organization, 30, 173-212. doi:10.1017/S0020818300018245
[22] Habermas, J., & Jacques, D. (2003). February 15, or What binds Europeans together: A plea for a common foreign policy, beginning in the core of Europe. Constellations: An International Journal of Critical & Democratic Theory, 10, 291-298. doi:10.1111/1467-8675.00333
[23] Harmsen, R., & Menno, S., (eds.). (2005). Euroscepticism: Party Politics, National Identity and European Integration. (European Studies 20, Yearbook of European Studies S.). Rodopi.
[24] Herrmann, R. K., Risse, T., & Brewer, M. B. (eds.). (2004). Transna- tional Identities: Becoming European in the EU. Rowman & Little- field.
[25] Hix, S. (1994). The Study of the European Community. The Chal- lenge to Comparative Politics. West European Politics, 17, 1-30. doi:10.1080/01402389408424999
[26] Hoffmann, S. (1964). Europe’s identity crisis: Between the past and America. Daedalus, 93, 1244-1297.
[27] Hoffmann, S. (1966). Obstinate or obsolete? The fate of the nation-state and the case of Western Europe. Daedalus, 95, 862-916.
[28] Hoffmann, S. (1982). Reflections on the nation-state in Western Europe today. Journal of Common Market Studies, 21, 21-37. doi:10.1111/j.1468-5965.1982.tb00637.x
[29] Hooghe, L., & Gary, M. (2001). Multi-Level Governance and European Integration, Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, Inc.
[30] Huelshoff, M. G. (1994). Domestic politics and dynamic issue linkage: A reformulation of integration theory. International Studies Quarterly, 38.
[31] Hurrell, A., & Anand, M. (1996). Politics Like Any Other? Comparative Politics, International Relations and the Study of the EU. West European Politics, 19, 386-402. doi:10.1080/01402389608425139
[32] Hurrell, A. (1995). Explaining the resurgence of regionalism in world politics. Review of International Studies, 21, 331-358. doi:10.1017/S0260210500117954
[33] Hurrell, A. (2007). One World? Many Worlds? The place of regions in the study of international society, Martin Wright Lecture 2006. International Affairs, 83, 151-166.
[34] Immanuel, M. W. (1979). The Capitalist World-Economy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
[35] Katzenstein, P. (1996). Regionalism in Comparative Perspective. ARENA Working Papers, 96, 1-43.
[36] Keating, M. (1989). Regionalism, devolution and the state, in Garside, P. L., & Hebbert, M. (eds.). British regionalization 1900-2000, London: Mansell.
[37] Keohane, R., & Stanley, H. (eds.). (1991). The New European Community: Decisionmaking and Institutional Change, Boulder, Colo. Westview.
[38] Keohane, R. O. (1984). After Hegemony: Cooperation and Discord in the World Political Economy. Princeton, N.J: Princeton University Press.
[39] Keohane, R. O., & Joseph, N. (1977). Power and Interdependence. World Politics in Transition, Boston: Little, Brown and Company.
[40] Kronsell, A. (2005). Gender, power and European integration theory, Journal of European Public Policy, 12, 1022-1040. doi:10.1080/13501760500270703
[41] Majone, G. (2001). Regulatory Legitimacy in the United States and the European Union, in Kalypso, N., & Robert, H. (eds.). The Federal Vision: Legitimacy and Levels of Governance in the US and the European Union, Oxford University Press.
[42] Mansfield, E. D., & Helen, V. M. (1999). The New Wave of Regionalism. International Organization, 53, 589-627.
[43] Marks, G., Liesbet, H., & Kermit, B. (1996). European Integration from the 1980s: State-Centric v. Multi-Level Governance, Journal of Common Market Studies, 34, 341-378. doi:10.1111/j.1468-5965.1996.tb00577.x
[44] Mattli, W. (1999). Explaining regional integration outcomes. Journal of European Public Policy, 6, 1-27. doi:10.1080/135017699343775
[45] Mattli, W. (2000). Sovereignty bargains in regional integration. International Studies Review, 2, 149-180. doi:10.1111/1521-9488.00208
[46] Mazey, S. (2002). Gender mainstreaming strategies in the EU: Delivering on an agenda? Feminist Legal Studies, 10, 227-240. doi:10.1023/A:1021223828355
[47] McLaren, L. (2006). Identity, Interests and Attitudes to European Integration, (Palgrave studies in European Union Politics), Palgrave Macmillan.
[48] Mearsheimer, J. (1990). Back to the future: Instability in Europe after the Cold War. International Organization, 15.
[49] Milner, H. (1992). International theories of cooperation among nations: Strengths and weaknesses. World Politics, 44.
[50] Mitrany, D. (1933). The Progress of International Government. New Haven.
[51] Moravcsik, A. (1991). Negotiating the Single European Act: National interests and conventional statecraft in the European Community. International Organization, 45, 19-56. doi:10.1017/S0020818300001387
[52] Moravcsik, A. (1993). Preferences and power in the European Community: A liberal intergovernmentalist approach. Journal of Common Market Studies, 31, 473-524. doi:10.1111/j.1468-5965.1993.tb00477.x
[53] Moravcsik, A. (1997). Taking preferences seriously: A liberal theory of international politics. International Organization, 51, 513-53. doi:10.1162/002081897550447
[54] Moravcsik, A. (1998). The Choice for Europe: Social Purpose and State Power from Messina to Maastricht. (Cornell Studies in Political Economy), Cornell University Press.
[55] Moravcsik, A. (1999). Is something rotten in the state of Denmark? Constructivism and European integration. Journal of European Public Policy, 6, 669-681. doi:10.1080/135017699343531
[56] Moravcsik, A., & Kalypso, N. (1999). Explaining the treaty of Amsterdam: Interests, influence, institutions. Journal of Common Market Studies, 37, 59. doi:10.1111/1468-5965.00150
[57] Nye, J. S. (1968). Comparative regional integration: Concept and measurement. International Organization, 22, 855-880. doi:10.1017/S0020818300013837
[58] Nye, J. S. (1971). Peace in parts: Integration and conflict in regional organization. Boston: Little Brown and Company.
[59] O'Neill, M. (1996). The Politics of European Integration: A Reader. Routledge. doi:10.4324/9780203428320
[60] Paasi, A. (2002). Regional transformation in the European context: Notes on regions, boundaries and identity. Space and Polity, 6, 197-201. doi:10.1080/1356257022000003626
[61] Puchala, D. J. (1972). Of blind men, elephants and international integration. Journal of Common Market Studies, 10, 267-284. doi:10.1111/j.1468-5965.1972.tb00903.x
[62] Risse, T. (2005). Neofunctionalism, European identity, and the puzzles of European integration. Journal of European Public Policy, 12, 291-309. doi:10.1080/13501760500044033
[63] Risse, T., & Antje, W. (1999). ‘Something rotten’ and the social construction of social constructivism: A comment on comments. Journal of European Public Policy, 6, 775-782. doi:10.1080/135017699343379
[64] Rosamond, B. (2000). Theories of European Integration. (The
[65] European Union), Palgrave Macmillan.
[66] Ruggie, J. G., Katzenstein, P. J., Keohane, R.O., & Schmitter, P. C. (2005). Transformations in world politics: The intellectual contributions of Ernst B. Haas. Annual Review of Political Science, 8.
[67] Ruggie, J. (1983). International regimes, transactions, and change: Embedded liberalism in the postwar economic order. Stephen D. K. (ed.). International Regimes.
[68] Russett, B., & John, O. (2001). Triangulating peace: Democracy, interdependence, and international organizations. Norton, W. W. Company, Inc.
[69] Sandholtz, W., & John, Z. (1989). 1992: Recasting the European bargain. World Politics, 42, 95-128. doi:10.2307/2010572
[70] Skonieczny, A. (2001). Constructing NAFTA: Myth, representation, and the discursive construction of U.S. foreign policy. International Studies Quarterly, 45, 433-454. doi:10.1111/0020-8833.00208
[71] Slaughter, B., & Anne, M. (1993). International Law and International Relations Theory: A dual agenda. American Journal of International Law, 87, 35.
[72] Tavares, R. (2008). Understanding regional peace and security: A framework for analysis. Contemporary Politics, 14, 107-127. doi:10.1111/0020-8833.00208
[73] Taylor, P. (1983). The Limits of European Integration. London and Canberra: Croom Helm.
[74] Tickner, A. (1992). Gender in International Relations: Feminist Perspectives on Achieving International Security. New York: Co- lumbia University Press.
[75] Tsebelis, G., & Geoffrey, G. (2001). The institutional foundations of intergovernmentalism and supranationalism in the European Union. International Organization, 55, 357-390. doi:10.1162/00208180151140603
[76] Waever, O. (1995). Identity, integration and security: Solving the sovereignty puzzle in E.U. Studies. Journal of International Affairs, 48, 389-431.
[77] Wallace, H., James, A. C., Fritz, W. S., & Andrew, M. (1999). Review section symposium: The choice for Europe: Social purpose and state power from Messina to Maastricht. Journal of European Public Policy, 6, 155-179. doi:10.1080/135017699343856
[78] Walt, S. M. (1997). Why alliances endure or collapse. Survival, 39, 156-179. doi:10.1080/00396339708442901
[79] Waltz, K. (1959). Man, the State, and War. NY: Columbia University Press.
[80] Waltz, K. (1979). Theory of International Relations. NY: Random House.
[81] Weiler, J. H. H. (1999). The Constitution of Europe: Do the New Clothes Have an Emperor? And Other Essays on European Integra- tion. Cambridge University Press.
[82] Wendt, A. (1994). Collective identity formation and the international state. American Political Science Review, 88, 384-396. doi:10.2307/2944711
[83] Wendt, A. (1999). Social Theory of International Politics. NY: Cambridge University Press.
[84] Wiener, A., & Diez, T (eds.). (2004). European Integration Theory: Past, Present and Future. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
[85] Wincott, D. (1995). Institutional interaction and European integration: Towards an everyday critique of Liberal intergovernmentalism. Journal of Common Market Studies, 33, 597-609. doi:10.1111/j.1468-5965.1995.tb00553.x
[86] Zürn, M., & Jeffrey, T. C. (2005). Getting socialized to build bridges: Constructivism and rationalism, Europe and the Nation-State. International Organization, 59, 1045-1079.

Copyright © 2022 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc.

Creative Commons License

This work and the related PDF file are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.