Share This Article:

On the Dynamic Role of Monopolistic Competition in the Monetary Economy

Abstract Full-Text HTML Download Download as PDF (Size:85KB) PP. 114-117
DOI: 10.4236/tel.2011.13024    4,692 Downloads   8,371 Views   Citations


Much static research on the new Keynesian economics is based on the distortion caused by monopolistic pricing. When the theory of monopolistic competition is extended to monetary dynamics in an overlapping generations (OLG) model (Otaki 2007, 2009), the underemployment problem is resolved by a proper monetary policy. However, even in the full-employment equilibrium, the market mechanism does not attain the socially optimal allocation. Since the rate of population growth is assumed to be zero, the optimal gross in- flation rate in the model is unity. There is no such coordination motive in a monetary economy, and hence, the inflation rate may exceed unity. The monopolistic power lowers the inflation rate. The prices of the cur- rent goods relative to the future goods increase by virtue of the monopolistic power. This improves the life- time utility because the lowered inflation rate corrects the consumption stream, which is biased toward the current goods.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Cite this paper

M. Otaki and Y. Tamai, "On the Dynamic Role of Monopolistic Competition in the Monetary Economy," Theoretical Economics Letters, Vol. 1 No. 3, 2011, pp. 114-117. doi: 10.4236/tel.2011.13024.


[1] M. Otaki, “The Dynamically Extended Keynesian Cross and the Welfare-Improving Fiscal Policy,” Economics Letters, Vol. 96, No. 1, 2007, pp. 23-29. doi:10.1016/j.econlet.2006.12.005
[2] M. Otaki, “A Welfare Economic Foundation for the Full-Employment Policy,” Economics Letters, Vol.102, No. 1, 2009, pp. 1-3. doi:10.1016/j.econlet.2008.08.003
[3] N. G. Mankiw, “Small Menu Costs and Large Business Cycles: A Macroeconomic Model of Monopoly,” Quarterly Journal of Economics, Vol. 100, No. 2, 1985, pp. 529-539. doi:10.2307/1885395
[4] N. G. Mankiw, “Imperfect Competition and the Keynesian Cross,” Economics Letters, Vol. 26, No. 1, 1988, pp. 7-14. doi:10.1016/0165-1765(88)90043-2
[5] O. Blanchard and N. Kiyotaki, “Monopolistic Competition and the Effects of Aggregate Demand,” American Economic Review, Vol. 77, No. 4, 1987, pp. 647-666.
[6] R. Starz, “Monopolistic Competition as a Foundation for Keynesian Macroeconomic Models,” Quarterly Journal of Economics, Vol. 104, No. 4, 1989, pp. 737-752.

comments powered by Disqus

Copyright © 2019 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc.

Creative Commons License

This work and the related PDF file are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.