Erratum to “Evaluation of a Suspended Personal Radiation Protection System vs. Conventional Apron and Shields in Clinical Interventional Procedures” [Open Journal of Radiology 3 (2013) 143-151]
Chet R. Rees
Baylor Scott and White Health, Dallas, USA.
DOI: 10.4236/ojrad.2017.74027   PDF    HTML   XML   1,032 Downloads   1,673 Views  

Abstract

The original online version of this article (C. Savage, T. Seale IV, C. Shaw, B. Angela, D. Marichal and C. Rees, “Evaluation of a Suspended Personal Radiation Protection System vs. Conventional Apron and Shields in Clinical Interventional Procedures,” Open Journal of Radilogy, 3, 143-151. http://dx.doi.org/10.4236/ojrad.2013.33024) was mistaken of the total isolates number in Table 2. The authors wish to correct the errors to: Table 2. Other study parameters “Gycm2” should be changed to “cGycm2” All of the decimal points (“.”) should be changed to commas (“,”). For example, “47.486” should be “47,486”.

Keywords

Erratum

Share and Cite:

Rees, C. (2017) Erratum to “Evaluation of a Suspended Personal Radiation Protection System vs. Conventional Apron and Shields in Clinical Interventional Procedures” [Open Journal of Radiology 3 (2013) 143-151]. Open Journal of Radiology, 7, 249-249. doi: 10.4236/ojrad.2017.74027.

Table 2. Other study parameters.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Copyright © 2024 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc.

Creative Commons License

This work and the related PDF file are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.