Share This Article:

Applicability of Sigmoid Colon Graft for Vaginal Replacement (Colovaginoplasty) at Young Age

Abstract Full-Text HTML Download Download as PDF (Size:689KB) PP. 422-426
DOI: 10.4236/ss.2011.28092    4,737 Downloads   7,917 Views   Citations

ABSTRACT

Objective: - To evaluate the applicability, feasibility, complications, short and long term results of vaginoplasty by using sigmoid colon graft with stapler assistance for resuming colonic continuity in children with absent vagina. Patients and Methods: - Records of 15 patients 8 of them had Androgen Insensitivity Syndrome, 4 had congenital vaginal atresia, and 3 had Congenital Adrenal Hyperplasia, underwent sigmoid graft vaginal reconstruction with the aid of circular stapler during the period from 2005 to 2010 were reviewed retrospectively. Results: A neovagina was constructed in those patients who aged from 3 to 9 years (mean 4 years), where sigmoid colon was used in all patients. Hospital stay ranged from 5 to 12 days (mean 7), operative time ranged from 60 to 120 min (mean 75 min). All patients were followed up 6 monthly in the first year and then yearly, complications occurred in 4 patients: introital stenosis in 2, and another 2 cases had minor wound infection. The need for neovaginal dilation was indicated in 5 out of 15 patients. There was no complications related to bowel anastomosis, No mortality in this group and the cosmetic results were excellent in all cases. Conclusion: Sigmoid colovaginoplasty appears to be applicable for remedy of vaginal atresia at any age. It is associated with a less complication rate, the long term results is satisfactory and it seems a better technique, especially in girls who doesn’t expect sexual activity shortly after surgery.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Cite this paper

M. Fahmy, H. Abeissy and M. Abdalla, "Applicability of Sigmoid Colon Graft for Vaginal Replacement (Colovaginoplasty) at Young Age," Surgical Science, Vol. 2 No. 8, 2011, pp. 422-426. doi: 10.4236/ss.2011.28092.

References

[1] D. M. Powell, K. D. Newman and J. Randloph, “A Proposed Classification of Vaginal Anomalies and Their Surgical Correction,” Journal of Pediatric Surgery, Vol. 30, No. 2, 1995, pp. 271-276. doi:10.1016/0022-3468(95)90573-1
[2] R. T. Frank, “The Formation of an Artificial Vagina without Operation,” American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Vol. 35, 1938, pp. 1053-1055.
[3] J. F. Baldwin, “The Formation of an Artificial Vagina by Intestinal Transplantation,” Annals of Surgery, Vol. 40, No. 3, 1904, pp. 398-403.
[4] J. H. Pratt, “Sigmoidovaginostomy: A New Method of Obtaining Satisfactory Vaginal Depth,” American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Vol. 81, No. 3, 1961, pp. 535-545.
[5] G. E. Griffin, C. Edwards, J. M. Madden, M. J. Harrod, and J. D. Wilson, “Congenital Absence of the Vagina the Mayer-Rokitansky-Kuster-Hauser Syndrome,” Annals of Internal Medicine, Vol. 85, No. 2, 1976, pp. 2224-2236.
[6] R. J. Miller and L. L. Breech, “Surgical Correction of Vaginal Anomalies,” Clinical Obstetrics and Gynecology, Vol. 51, No. 2, 2008, pp. 223-236. doi:10.1097/GRF.0b013e31816d2181
[7] J. M. Schober, “Long-Term Outcomes and Changing Attitudes to Intersexuality,” BJU International, Vol. 83, No. S3, 1999, pp. 39-50. doi:10.1046/j.1464-410x.1999.0830s3039.x
[8] G. Mattioli, M. Castagnetti, P. Repetto, et al., “Complications of Mechanical Suturing in Pediatric Patients,” Journal of Pediatric Surgery, Vol. 38, No. 7, 2003, pp. 1051- 1054. doi:10.1016/S0022-3468(03)00190-8
[9] K. Graziano, D. H. Teitelbaum, R. B. Hirschl and A. G. Coran, “Vaginal Reconstruction for Ambiguous Genitalia and Congenital Absence of the Vagina: A 27-Year Experience,” Journal of Pediatric Surgery, Vol. 37, No. 7, 2002, pp. 955- 960. doi:10.1053/jpsu.2002.33815
[10] A. Rajimwale, P. D. Furness, W. O. Brant and M. A. Koyle, “Vaginal Construction Using Sigmoid Colon in Children and Young Adults,” BJU International, Vol. 94, No. 1, 2004, pp. 115-119. doi:10.1111/j.1464-4096.2004.04911.x
[11] W. H. Hendren and A. Atala, “Use of Bowel for Vaginal Reconstruction,” The Journal of Urology, Vol. 152, No. 2, 1997, pp. 752-755.
[12] R. Lenaghan, N. Wilson, C. E. Lucas and A. M. Ledgerwood, “The Role of Rectosigmoid Neocolporrhaphy,” Surgery, Vol. 122, No. 4, 1997, pp. 856-860. doi:10.1016/S0039-6060(97)90098-2
[13] D. P. Froese, R. Haggitt and W. G. Friend, “Ulcerative Colitis in Autotransplanted Neovagina,” Gastroenterology, Vol. 100, No. 6, 1991, pp. 1749-1752.
[14] M. Urrsic-Vrscaj, J. Lindtner, J. Lavomovec et al., “Adenocarcinoma in Sigmoid Neovagina,” European Journal of Gyneacological/Oncology, Vol. 15, No. 1, 1994, pp. 24-28.
[15] F. Borruto, S. T. Chasen, F. A. Chervenak and L. Fedele, “The Vecchietti Procedure for Surgical Treatment of Vaginal Agenesis: Comparison of Laparoscopy and Laparotomy,” International Journal of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, Vol. 64, No. 2, 1999, pp. 153-158. doi:10.1016/S0020-7292(98)00244-6
[16] J. C. Goligher, “The Use of Pedicled Transplant of Sigmoid for Vaginal Construction,” Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England, Vol. 65, No. 6, 1983, pp. 353-355.

  
comments powered by Disqus

Copyright © 2019 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc.

Creative Commons License

This work and the related PDF file are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.