Share This Article:

Assessing outcomes after fast track surgical management of corpus cancer

Abstract Full-Text HTML Download Download as PDF (Size:70KB) PP. 139-143
DOI: 10.4236/ojog.2011.13026    5,507 Downloads   8,523 Views   Citations


Objective: The aim of the study was to audit the outcomes of patients with corpus cancer managed with a fast track surgery (FTS) program. Design: Clinical audit of outcomes after laparotomy for corpus cancer and managed by FTS principles. Setting: Tertiary hospital, University based subspecialty gynaecological oncology practice. Population or Sample: Consecutive patients with uterine corpus cancer. There were no exclusions. Methods: Three year audit of FTS Database. Main Outcome Measures: Ability to tolerate early oral feeding (EOF), length of stay (LOS), perioperative complication rate and readmission rate. Results: Sixty six patients were operated upon whose median age was 59.5 years. Forty six (70%) had stage I disease, 7 (11%) stage II, 9 (14%) stage III and 4 (6%) had stage IV disease. Twenty seven (41%) had lymph node sampling performed. Median operating time was 2.5 hours. Mean BMI was 30 kg/m2 (Range: 18 - 47). Fifty patients (76%) were classified as over-weight or obese. Twenty four patients (36%) had a “non-zero” performance status. Mean intraoperative EBL was 227 ml. Median LOS was 3.0 days. There were 3 (5%) intraoperative complications. There were no intraoperative ureteric, bowel or vascular injuries. Postoperatively, 13 (20%) patients experienced a total of 24 adverse events. Only 2 (3%) patients experienced complications greater than grade 2. Conclusion: This audit shows that in an unselected group of patients undergoing laparotomy as management for their uterine malignancy and managed by a FTS protocol, overall excellent results can be achieved.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Cite this paper

Carter, J. and Philp, S. (2011) Assessing outcomes after fast track surgical management of corpus cancer. Open Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 1, 139-143. doi: 10.4236/ojog.2011.13026.


[1] AIHW (Australian Institute of Health and Welfare) & AACR (Australasian association of cancer registries) (2008) Cancer in Australia: An overview, Cancer series, 46.
[2] Kitchener, H., Swart, A.M., Qian, Q., Amos, C. and Parmar, M.K. (2009) Efficacy of systematic pelvic lymphadenectomy in endometrial cancer (MRC ASTEC trial): A randomised study. Lancet, 10, 373, 125-136.
[3] Kehlet, H. (2009) Principles of fast track surgery. Multimodal perioperative therapy programme. Chirurg, 80, 687-689. doi:10.1007/s00104-009-1675-2
[4] Kehlet, H. and Wilmore, D.W. (2002) Multimodal strategies to improve surgical outcome. American Journal of Surgery, 183, 630-641. doi:10.1016/S0002-9610(02)00866-8
[5] Carter, J., Szabo, R., Sim, W., Pather, S., Philp, S., Nattress, K., et al. (2010) Fast track surgery in gynaecological oncology. A clinical audit. The Australian and New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 50, 159-163. doi:10.1111/j.1479-828X.2009.01134.x
[6] McDonnell, J., O’Donnell, B., Curley, G., Heffernan, A., Power, C. and Laffey, J. (2007) The analgesic efficacy of transverse abdominis plane block after abdominal surgery: A prospective randomized controlled trial. Anesthesia and Analgesia, 104, 193-197. doi:10.1213/01.ane.0000250223.49963.0f
[7] Scally, G. and Donaldson, L. (1998) Clinical governance and the drive for quality improvement in the new NHS in England. British Medicine Journal, 4, 61-65.
[8] RACS. (2008) A Guide by the Royal Australian College of Surgeons. Royal Australian College of Surgeons Statement, Surgical Audit and Peer Review.
[9] Grover, F.L., Shroyer, A.L, Hammermeister, K., Edwards, F.H., Ferguson, T.B., Dziuban, S.W., et al. (2001) A decade’s experience with quality improvement in cardiac surgery using the veterans affairs and society of thoracic surgeons national databases. Annual Surgery, 234, 464-472. doi:10.1097/00000658-200110000-00006
[10] Janda, M., Gebski, V., Brand, A., Hogg, R., Jobling, T., Land, R., et al. (2010) Quality of life after total laparoscopic hysterectomy versus total abdominal hysterectomy for stage I endometrial cancer (LACE): A randomised trial. The Lancet Oncology, 16, 1-9.
[11] Kornblith, A.B., Huang, H.Q., Walker, J.L., Spirtos, N.M., Rotmensch, J. and Cella, D. (2009) Quality of life of patients with endometrial cancer undergoing laparoscopic international federation of gynecology and obstetrics staging compared with laparotomy: A Gynecologic Oncology Group Study. Journal of Clinical Oncology, 27, 5337-5542. doi:10.1200/JCO.2009.22.3529
[12] Mourits, M., Bijen, C., Art, H., Brugge H.T., Sijde, R.V.D., Paulsen, et al. (2010) Safety of laparoscopy versus laparotomy in early-stage endometrial cancer: A randomised trial. Lancet Oncology, 16, 1-9.
[13] Walker, J.L., Piedmonte, M.R., Spirtos, N.M., Eisenkop, S.M., Schlaerth, J.B., Mannel, R.S., et al. (2009) Laparoscopy compared with laparotomy for comprehensive surgical staging of uterine cancer: Gynecologic oncology group study LAP2. Journal Clinical Oncology, 27, 5331. doi:10.1200/JCO.2009.22.3248

comments powered by Disqus

Copyright © 2019 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc.

Creative Commons License

This work and the related PDF file are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.