A theoretical analysis of the growth process of an organism and its dependence on various allometric relations
Sudipto Roy, Priyadarshi Majumdar, Subhankar Ghosh
DOI: 10.4236/ns.2011.39105   PDF   HTML     4,127 Downloads   8,681 Views   Citations


A new mathematical model regarding the growth process of an organism is proposed, based on the role of surplus power (i.e. power intake minus metabolic cost) and having an allometric dependence on mass. Considering its use in growth, a differential equation has been formed, similar to the von Bertalanffy growth function (VBGF). The time dependence of mass and growth rate, obtained from this equation, has been shown graphically to illustrate the roles played by scaling exponents and other parameters. Concepts of optimum mass, saturation mass and the mass corresponding to the highest growth rate have been discussed under the proposed theoretical framework. Information regarding the dependence of effective growth duration on various parameters has been found graphically. The time of occurrence of the highest growth rate and its dependence on various parameters have been explored graphically. A new parameter (ρ) has been defined, which determines the availability of surplus power at different stages of the growth process of an organism. Depending on its value, there can be three distinctly different modes of growth phenomenon, reflected in the change of surplus power with time. The variations of growth and reproduction efficiencies with time and mass have been shown for different values of the scaling exponent. The limitation regarding the practical measurement of growth rate has been discussed using the present model. Some aspects of length-biomass allometry have been explored theoretically and the results have been depicted graphically.

Share and Cite:

Roy, S. , Majumdar, P. and Ghosh, S. (2011) A theoretical analysis of the growth process of an organism and its dependence on various allometric relations. Natural Science, 3, 802-811. doi: 10.4236/ns.2011.39105.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.


[1] Hedin, L.O. (2006) Physiology: Plants on a different scale. Nature, 439: 399-400. doi:10.1038/439399a
[2] Harris, L.A., Duarte, C.M. and Nixon, S.W. (2006) Allometric laws and prediction in estuarine and coastal ecology. Estuaries and Coasts, 29, 340-344. doi:10.1007/BF02782002
[3] McKechnie, A.E., Freckleton, R.P. and Jetz, W. (2006) Phenotypic plasticity in the scaling of avian basal metabolic rate. Proceedings of the Royal Society B, 273, 931-937. doi:10.1098/rspb.2005.3415
[4] Van der Meer, J., Metabolic theories in ecology. Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 21, 136-140. doi:10.1016/j.tree.2005.11.004
[5] West, G.B., Woodruff, W.H. and Brown, J.H. (2002) Allometric scaling of metabolic rate from molecules and mitochondria to cells and mammals. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA, 99, 2473-2478. doi:10.1073/pnas.012579799
[6] Kozlowski, J. (1992) Optimal allocation of resources to growth and reproduction: Implications for age and size at maturity. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 7, 15-19. doi:10.1016/0169-5347(92)90192-E
[7] Sebens, K.P. (2002) Energetic constraints, size gradients, and size limits in benthic marine invertebrates. Integrative and Comparative Biology, 42, 853-861. doi:10.1093/icb/42.4.853
[8] Kozlowski, J. and Weiner, J. (1997) Interspecific allometries are by-products of body size optimization. American Naturalist, 149, 352-380. doi:10.1086/285994
[9] Castorina, P., Delsanto, P.P. and Guiot, C. (2006) Classification scheme for phenomenological universalities in growth problems in physics and other sciences. Physical Review Letters, 96, 188701-188704. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.96.188701
[10] Gompertz, B. (1825) On the nature of the function expressive of the law of human mortality and on the mode of determining the value of life contingencies. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society (London), 115, 513-585. doi:10.1098/rstl.1825.0026
[11] Steel, G.G. (1977) Growth Kinetics of Tumors. Clarendon Press, Oxford.
[12] Weldom, T.E. (1988) Mathematical model in cancer rersearch. Adam Hilger Publisher, Briston.
[13] Von Bertalanffy, L. (1960) Principles and theory of growth. In: Nowinski, W.W., Ed., Fundamental Aspects of Normal and Malignant Growth, Elsevier, Amsterdam, 137-259.
[14] Von Bertalanffy, L. (1938) A quantitative theory of organic growth (inquiries on growth laws II). Human Biology, 10, 181- 213.
[15] Brown, J.H., Gillooly, J.F., Allen, A.P., Savage, V.M. and West, G.B. (2004) Toward a metabolic theory of ecology. Ecology, 85, 1771-1789. doi:10.1890/03-9000
[16] Kooijman, S.A.L.M. (2010) Dynamic energy budget theory for metabolic organisation. 3rd Edition, Cam- bridge University Press, Cambridge.
[17] Sousa, T., Domingos, T. and Kooijman, S.A.L.M. (2008) From empirical patterns to theory: A formal metabolic theory of life. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B, 363, 2453-2464. doi:10.1098/rstb.2007.2230
[18] Rau, A.R.P. (2002) Biological scaling and physics. Journal of Biosciences, 27, 475-478. doi:10.1007/BF02705043
[19] Demetrius, L. (2006) The origin of allometric scaling laws in biology. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 243, 455-467. doi:10.1016/j.jtbi.2006.05.031
[20] Vogel, S. (2004) Living in a physical world. Journal of Biosciences, 29, 391-397. doi:10.1007/BF02712110
[21] Da Silva, J.K.L. and Barbosa, L.A. (2007) Non-universal Interspecific Allometric Scaling of Metabolism. Journal of Physics A, 40, F1-F7.
[22] Da Silva, J.K.L. and Barbosa, L.A. (2009) Non-universal interspecific allometric scaling of metabolism. Brazilian Journal of Physics, 39, 699-706.
[23] Economos, A.C. (1982) On the origin of biological similarity. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 94, 25-60. doi:10.1016/0022-5193(82)90328-9
[24] Biswas, D., Das, S.K. and Roy, S. (2008) Importance of scaling exponents and other parameters in growth mechanism: An analytical approach. Theory In Biosciences, 127, 271-276. doi:10.1007/s12064-008-0045-9
[25] Biswas, D., Das, S.K. and Roy, S. (200/8) Dependence of the individual growth process upon allometric scaling exponents and other parameters. Journal of Biological Systems, 16, 151-163. doi:10.1142/S0218339008002411
[26] West, G.B., Brown, J.H. and Enquist, B.J. (2004) Growth model based on first principle or phenomenology. Functional Ecology, 18, 188-196. doi:10.1111/j.0269-8463.2004.00857.x
[27] Makarieva, A.M., Gorshkov, V.G. and Li, B.-L. (2004) Ontogenetic growth: Models and theory. Ecological Modelling, 176, 15-26. doi:10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2003.09.037
[28] Warren, C.E. and Davis, G.E. (1967) Laboratory studies on the feeding bioenergetics and growth of fish. In: Gerking, S.D., Ed., The Biological Basis for Freshwater Fish Production, Blackwell, Oxford, 175-214.
[29] Sebens, K.P. (1979) The energetics of asexual reproduction and colony formation in benthic marine invertebrates. Integrative and Comparative Biology, 19, 683-697. doi:10.1093/icb/19.3.683
[30] Sebens, K.P. (1982) The limits to indeterminate growth: An optimal size model applied to passive suspension feeders. Ecology, 63, 209-222. doi:10.2307/1937045
[31] Pandian, T.J. and Vernberg, F.J. (1987) Animal energetics. Academic Press, San Diego.
[32] Brody, S. (1945) Biogenetics and growth. Reinhold Publishing Corporation, New York.
[33] Majumdar, P. and Roy, S. (2010) A theoretical interpretation of length-biomass allometry of predominantly bidimensional seaweeds. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 266, 226-230. doi:10.1016/j.jtbi.2010.06.035
[34] Scrosati, R. (2006) Length-biomass allometry in primary producers: Predominantly bidimensional seaweeds differ from the ‘‘universal’’ interspecific trend defined by microalgae and vascular plants. Canadian Journal of Botany, 84, 1159-1166. doi:10.1139/b06-077

Copyright © 2023 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc.

Creative Commons License

This work and the related PDF file are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.