Experimental and Modeling Investigation of Shallow Water Table Fluctuations in Relation to Reverse Wieringermeer Effect

Ibrahimi Mohamed Khaled, Miyazaki Tsuyoshi, Nishikawa Kohei, Nishimura Taku, Imoto Hiromi

.

DOI: 10.4236/ojss.2011.12003                

Abstract

Soil column experiments and modeling investigations were performed to study the behavior of shallow water table in response to various recharge events. Hence, shallow water table fluctuations inside sandy (Toyoura sand) and clayey (Chiba light clay) soil columns in response to surface and sub-surface recharge events were investigated under laboratory conditions. Experimental results showed that small application of water could raise the shallow water table level more than 100 times in depth in the case of Toyoura sand and more than 50 times in the case of Chiba LiC, reflecting a reverse Wieringermeer effect (RWE) response type of groundwater. This rise was associated with a prompt change of pressure head values which exhibited instantaneous fluctuations of centimeters due to the addition of millimeters of water. The recharge volumes leading to such disproportionate water table rise were successfully estimated using a simple analytical model based on the moisture retention curve of the soil and considering the hysteresis effect on soil water dynamics within the capillary fringe zone.

Keywords

Groundwater Fluctuation, Shallow Water Table, Reverse Wieringermeer Effect, Capillary Fringe

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

[1]	P. Dillon and I. Simmers, “Shallow Groundwater Sys- tems: IAH International Contribution to Hydrogeology 18,” Taylor and Francis, Rotterdam, 1998.
[2]	S.W. Tyler, J. F. Munoz and W.W. Wood, “The Re- sponse of Playa and Sabkha Hydraulics and Mineralogy to Climate Forcing,” Ground Water, Vol. 44, 2006, pp. 329-338. doi:10.1111/j.1745-6584.2005.00096.x
[3]	L. Xu, J. Yang, Q. Zhang and H. Niu, “Modelling Water and Salt Transport in a Soil–Water–Plant System under Different Groundwater Tables,” Water and Environment Journal, Vol. 22, 2008, pp. 265-273. doi:10.1111/j.1747-6593.2007.00102.x
[4]	A. L. O'Brien, “Rapid Water Table Rise,” Journal of the American Water Resources Association, Vol. 18, No. 4, 1982, pp. 713-715. doi:10.1111/j.1752-1688.1982.tb00056.x
[5]	N. Cartwright, T. E. Baldock, P. Nielsen, D. S. Jeng and L. Tao, “Swash-aquifer Interaction in the Vicinity of the Water Table Exit Point on a Sandy Beach,” Journal of Geophysical Research, Vol. 111, 2006, 1-13. doi:10.1029/2005JC003149
[6]	K. Ibrahimi, T. Miyazaki and T. Nishimura, “A High Measurement Frequency Based Assessment of Shallow Groundwater Fluctuations in Metouia Oasis, South Tuni- sia,” Hydrological Research Letters, Vol. 4, pp. 75-79. doi:10.3178/HRL.4.75
[7]	F. D. Heliotis, and C. B. DeWitt, “Rapid Water Table Responses to Rainfall in a Northern Peatland Ecosystem,” Water Resources Bulletin, Vol. 23, 1987, pp. 1011-1016.
[8]	E. P. Weeks, “The Lisse Effect Revisited,” Ground Water, Vol. 40, 2002, pp. 652-656. doi:10.1111/j.1745-6584.2002.tb02552.x
[9]	R. W. Gillham, “The Capillary Fringe and its Effect on Water Table Response,” Journal of Hydrology, Vol. 67, No.1-4, 1984, pp. 307-324. doi:10.1016/0022-1694(84)90248-8
[10]	D. P. Horn, “Measurements and Modeling of Beach Groundwater Flow in the Swash-zone: a review,” Conti- nental Shelf Research, Vol. 26, No. 5, 2006, pp. 622-652. doi:10.1016/j.csr.2006.02.001
[11]	R. W. Healy and P. G. Cook, “Using Groundwater Lev- els to Estimate Recharge,” Hydrogeology Journal, Vol. 10, No. 1, 2002, pp. 91-109. doi:10.1007/s10040-001-0178-0
[12]	M. Sophocleous, “The Role of Specific Yield in Ground- water Recharge Estimations: a numerical study,” Ground Water, Vol. 23, No. 1, 1985, pp. 52-58. doi:10.1111/j.1745-6584.1985.tb02779.x
[13]	F. H. Jaber, S. Shukla, and S. Srivastava, “Recharge, Upflux and Water Table Response for Shallow Water Ta- ble Conditions in SE Florida,” Hydrological Processes, Vol. 20, No. 9, 2006, pp. 1895-1907. doi:10.1002/hyp.5951
[14]	M. T. van Genuchten, “A Close-form Equation for Pre- dicting the Hydraulic Conductivity of Unsaturated Soils,” Soil Science Society of America Journal, Vol. 44, No. 5, 1980, pp. 892-898. doi:10.2136/sssaj1980.03615995004400050002x
[15]	Y. Mualem, “A Conceptual Model of Hysteresis,” Water Resources Research, Vol. 10, No. 3, 1974, pp. 514-520. doi:10.1029/WR010i003p00514
[16]	Y. Mualem and G. Dagan, “A Dependence Domain Model of Capillary Hysteresis,” Water Resources Re- search, Vol. 11, No. 3, 1975, pp. 452-460. doi:10.1029/WR011i003p00452
[17]	J. B. Kool and J. C. Parker, “Development and Evaluation of Closed-form Expressions for Hysteretic Soil Hydraulic Properties,” Water Resources Research, Vol. 23, No. 1, 1987, pp. 105-114. doi:10.1029/WR023i001p00105
[18]	H. C. Huang, Y. C. Tan, C. W. Liu and C. H. Chen, “A Novel Hysteresis Model in Unsaturated Soil,” Hydro- logical Processes, Vol. 19, No. 8, 2005 pp. 1653-1665. doi:10.1002/hyp.5594
[19]	A. Klute, “Water Retention: Laboratory Methods. Meth- ods of Soil Analysis. Part 1 Physical and Mineralogical Methods,” 2nd Edition, American Society of Agronomy, Inc. Soil Science Society of America, Inc., 1986, pp. 635-662.
[20]	M. Price, “Specific Yield Determinations from a Con- solidated Sand Stone Aquifer,” Journal of Hydrology, Vol. 33, No. 1-2, 1977, pp. 147-156. doi:10.1016/0022-1694(77)90104-4
[21]	A. S. Abdul and R. W. Gillham, “Laboratory Studies of the Effects of the Capillary Fringe on Stream Flow Gen- eration,” Water Resources Research, Vol. 20, No. 6, 1984, pp. 691-698. doi:10.1029/WR020i006p00691