New Result for Strongly Starlike Functions

Abstract

In this paper, using Salagean differential operator, we define and investigate a new subclass of univalent functions . We also establish a characterization property for functions belonging to the class .

Share and Cite:

Ayinla, R. and Opoola, T. (2017) New Result for Strongly Starlike Functions. Applied Mathematics, 8, 324-328. doi: 10.4236/am.2017.83027.

1. Introduction

Let A be the class of functions of the form

f ( z ) = z + k = 2 a k z k (1)

which are analytic in the unit disk U = { z C : | z | < 1 } . A function f ( z ) A is said to be starlike of order α if and only if

Re { z f ( z ) f ( z ) } > α , 0 α < 1 ( z U ) (2)

We denote by S ( α ) the subclass of A consisting of functions which are starlike of order α in U .

Also, a function f ( z ) A is said to be convex of order α if and only if

Re { 1 + z f ( z ) f ( z ) } > α , 0 α < 1 ( z U ) (3)

We denote by C ( α ) the subclass of A consisting of functions which are convex of order α in U .

If f ( z ) A satisfies

| arg ( z f ( z ) f ( z ) α ) | < π β 2 , 0 α < 1 , 0 < β 1 , ( z U ) (4)

then f ( z ) is said to be strongly starlike of order β and type α in U , denoted by [1] .

If f ( z ) A satisfies

| arg ( 1 + z f ( z ) f ( z ) α ) | < π β 2 , 0 α < 1 , 0 < β 1 , ( z U ) (5)

then f ( z ) is said to be strongly convex of order β and type α in U , denoted by C α ( β ) [1] .

The following lemma is needed to derive our result for class S α n ( β ) .

Lemma (1) [2] [3] [4] [5] . Let a function p ( z ) be analytic in U , p ( 0 ) = 1 and p ( z ) 0 ( z U ) , if there exists a point z 0 U such that

| arg ( p ( z ) ) | < π β 2 ( | z | < | z 0 | ) and | arg ( p ( z 0 ) ) | = π β 2 with 0 < β 1 , then

z 0 p ( z 0 ) p ( z 0 ) = i k β (6)

where

k 1 2 ( a + 1 a ) ( when arg ( p ( z 0 ) ) ) = π β 2

k 1 2 ( a + 1 a ) ( when arg ( p ( z 0 ) ) ) = π β 2

And p ( z 0 ) 1 β = ± i a ( a > 0 ) .

Definition 1. A function f ( z ) A is said to be in the class S α n ( β ) if

| arg ( D n + 1 f ( z ) D n f ( z ) α ) | < π β 2 , ( z U ) (7)

For some α , 0 α < 1 , n N 0 = N { 0 } 0 < β 1 .

Remark

When n = 0 then S α n ( β ) is the class studied by [1] .

Definition 2. For functions f ( z ) A the Salagean differential operator [6] is D n : A A

D 0 f ( z ) = f ( z ) , D 1 f ( z ) = z f ( z ) , D n f ( z ) = D [ D n 1 f ( z ) ] , n = 0 , 1 , 2 , 3 ,

The main focus of this work is to provide a characterization property for the class of functions belonging to the class S α n ( β ) .

2. Main Result

Theorem 1. If f ( z ) A satisfies

( i ) D n + 1 f ( z ) D n f ( z ) 1 2 ( i i ) | D n + 2 f ( z ) / D n + 1 f ( z ) D n + 1 f ( z ) / D n f ( z ) 1 | < β 2 , ( z U )

for some β , 0 < β 1 , n N 0 = N { 0 } , then f ( z ) S 1 2 n ( β )

Proof. Let

p ( z ) = 2 D n + 1 f ( z ) D n f ( z ) 1 , n N 0 n = 0 , 1 , 2 , (8)

Taking the logarithmic differentiation in both sides of Equation (8), we have

p ( z ) p ( z ) = [ D n f ( z ) 2 ( D n + 1 f ( z ) ) 2 D n + 1 f ( z ) [ D n f ( z ) ] [ D n f ( z ) ] 2 ] [ D n f ( z ) 2 D n + 1 f ( z ) D n f ( z ) ] = [ D n f ( z ) 2 ( D n + 1 f ( z ) ) 2 D n + 1 f ( z ) [ D n f ( z ) ] D n f ( z ) ] [ 1 2 D n + 1 f ( z ) D n f ( z ) ] = 2 ( D n + 1 f ( z ) ) D n f ( z ) p ( z ) 2 D n + 1 f ( z ) [ D n f ( z ) ] [ D n f ( z ) ] 2 p ( z ) (9)

Multiply Equation (9) through by p ( z ) , to get

p ( z ) = 2 ( D n + 1 f ( z ) ) D n f ( z ) 2 D n + 1 f ( z ) ( D n f ( z ) ) ( D n f ( z ) ) 2 (10)

Multiply Equation (10) by z to obtain

z p ( z ) = 2 z ( D n + 1 f ( z ) ) D n f ( z ) 2 D n + 1 f ( z ) z ( D n f ( z ) ) ( D n f ( z ) ) 2 = 2 ( D n + 2 f ( z ) ) D n f ( z ) ( 1 + p ( z ) ) 2 2 (11)

Multiply Equation (11) through by 2 and divide through by ( 1 + p ( z ) ) 2 to give

2 z p ( z ) ( 1 + p ( z ) ) 2 = 4 ( D n + 2 f ( z ) ) D n f ( z ) ( 1 + p ( z ) ) 2 1 (12)

Multiplying Equation (12) by D n + 1 f ( z ) D n f ( z ) = 1 + p ( z ) 2 , and further simplifica-

tion, we obtain

D n + 1 f ( z ) D n f ( z ) ( 1 + 2 z p ( z ) ( 1 + p ( z ) ) 2 ) = D n + 2 f ( z ) D n + 1 f ( z ) , z U , n N 0 (13)

therefore,

D n + 2 f ( z ) / D n + 1 f ( z ) D n + 1 f ( z ) / D n f ( z ) = 1 + 2 z p ( z ) ( 1 + p ( z ) ) 2 (14)

If a point z 0 U which satisfies | arg p ( z ) | < π β 2 ( | z | < | z 0 | ) and

| arg p ( z 0 ) | = π β 2

then by lemma [2]

z 0 p ( z 0 ) p ( z 0 ) = i k β

k 1 2 ( a + 1 a ) and p ( z 0 ) = a β e i π β 2 or p ( z 0 ) = a β e i β 2 ( a > 0 )

Now,

| D n + 2 f ( z 0 ) / D n + 1 f ( z 0 ) D n + 1 f ( z 0 ) D n f ( z 0 ) 1 | = 2 k β | p ( z 0 ) ( 1 + p ( z 0 ) ) 2 | 2 β 1 2 ( a + 1 a ) | p ( z 0 ) | | ( 1 + p ( z 0 ) ) 2 | (15)

Since,

1 | ( 1 + p ( z 0 ) ) 2 | 1 1 + 2 | p ( z 0 ) | + | p ( z 0 ) 2 | (16)

| D n + 2 f ( z 0 ) / D n + 1 f ( z 0 ) D n + 1 f ( z 0 ) / D n f ( z 0 ) 1 | β ( a + 1 a ) | p ( z 0 ) | 1 + 2 | p ( z 0 ) | + | p ( z 0 ) | 2 (17)

But p ( z 0 ) = a β e i π β 2 , a > 0 | p ( z 0 ) | = a β = β ( a + 1 a ) a β 1 + 2 a β + a 2 β = ( a + 1 a ) β a β + 2 + a β

Let

S ( a ) = a + 1 a a β + 2 + a β

then

S ( a ) = 2 ( a 2 1 ) + ( 1 β ) a β ( a 2 ( 1 + β ) 1 ) + ( 1 + β ) a β ( a 2 ( 1 β ) 1 ) a 2 ( a β + 2 + a β ) 2 (18)

Hence, S ( a ) = 0 a = 1 .

It implies that

S ( a ) < 0 when 0 < a < 1 and S ( a ) > 0 when a > 1 , hence , a = 1 is a minimum

point of S ( a ) S ( 1 ) = 1 2 .

Therefore, we have that

| D n + 2 f ( z ) f ( z 0 ) / D n + 1 f ( z 0 ) D n + 1 f ( z 0 ) / D n f ( z 0 ) 1 | β 2 , n N 0 , z U (19)

which contradicts the condition of the theorem.

Hence, it is concluded from lemma [2] that

| arg p ( z ) | = | arg ( D n + 1 f ( z ) D n f ( z ) 1 2 ) | < π β 2 , z U , n N 0 (20)

so that

f ( z ) S 1 2 n ( β ) .

Acknowledgements

The authors wish to thank the referees for their useful suggestions that lead to improvement of the quality of the work in this paper.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

[1] Owa, S., Nunokawa, M., Saitoh, H., Ikeda, A. and Koike, N. (1997) Some Results for Strongly Functions. Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications, 212, 98-106.
https://doi.org/10.1006/jmaa.1997.5468
[2] Aouf, M., Dziok, J. and Sokol, J. (2011) On a Subclass of Strongly Starlike Functions. Applied Mathematics Letters, 24, 27-32.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aml.2010.08.004
[3] Nunokawa, M. (1992) On Properties of Non-Caratheodory Functions. Proceedings of the Japan Academy, Ser. A, Mathematical Sciences, 68, 152-153.
https://doi.org/10.3792/pjaa.68.152
[4] Nunokawa, M. (1993) On the Order of Strongly Starlikeness of Strongly Convex Functions. Proceedings of the Japan Academy, Ser. A, Mathematical Sciences, 69, 234-237.
https://doi.org/10.3792/pjaa.69.234
[5] Obradovic, M. and Owa, S. (1989) A Criterion for Starlikeness. Mathematische Nachrichten, 140, 97-102.
https://doi.org/10.1002/mana.19891400109
[6] Salagean, G.S. (1983) Subclasses of Univalent Functions. Lecture Notes in Math. Springer-Verlag, Heidelberg and New York, 1013, 362-372.

Copyright © 2024 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc.

Creative Commons License

This work and the related PDF file are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.