Response Inhibition and Memory Retrieval of Emotional Target Words: Evidence from an Emotional Stop-Signal Task

DOI: 10.4236/jbbs.2011.13020   PDF   HTML     6,262 Downloads   12,627 Views   Citations


Previous research suggests that emotional stimuli capture attention and guide behavior often automatically. The present study investigated the relationship between emotion-driven attention capture and motor response inhibition to emotional words in the stop-signal task. By experimental variations of the onset of motor response inhibition across the time-course of emotional word processing, we show that processing of emotional information significantly interferes with motor response inhibition in an early time-window, previously related to automatic emotion-driven attention capture. Second, we found that stopping reduced memory recall for unpleasant words during a subsequent surprise free recall task supporting assumptions of a link between mechanisms of motor response inhibition and memory functions. Together, our results provide behavioral evidence for dual competition models of emotion and cognition. This study provides an important link between research focusing on different sub-processes of emotion processing (from perception to action and from action to memory).

Share and Cite:

C. Herbert and S. Sütterlin, "Response Inhibition and Memory Retrieval of Emotional Target Words: Evidence from an Emotional Stop-Signal Task," Journal of Behavioral and Brain Science, Vol. 1 No. 3, 2011, pp. 153-159. doi: 10.4236/jbbs.2011.13020.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.


[1] P. J. Lang, M. M. Bradley and B. N. Cuthbert, “Motivated Attention: Affect, Activation, and Action,” In: P. J. Lang, R. F. Simons and M. Balaban, Eds., Attention and Emotion: Sensory and Motivational Processes, Erlbaum, Mahwah, 1997, pp. 97-135.
[2] J. DeHouwer and H. Tibboel, “Stop What You Are Not Doing! Emotional Pictures Interfere with the Task Not to Respond,” Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, Vol. 17, No. 5, 2010, pp. 699-703. doi:10.3758/PBR.17.5.699
[3] M. Goldstein, G. Brendel, O. Tuescher, H. Pan, J. Epstein, et al., “Neural Substrates of the Interaction of Emotional Stimulus Processing and Motor Inhibitory Control: An Emotional Linguistic Go/No-Go fMRI Study,” Neuroimage, Vol. 36, No. 3 2007, pp. 1026-1040. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2007.01.056
[4] K. P. Schulz, J. Fan, O. Magidina, D. J. Marks, B. Hahn, et al., “Does the Emotional Go/No-Go Task Really Measure Behavioral Inhibition? Convergence with Measures on a Non-Emotional Analog,” Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, Vol. 22, No. 2, 2007, pp. 151-160. doi:10.1016/j.acn.2006.12.001
[5] G. D. Logan, “On the Ability to Inhibit Thought and Action: A User’S Guide to the Stop-Signal Paradigm,” In: D. Dagenbach and T. H. Carr, Eds., Inhibitory Processes in Attention, Memory, and Language, Academic Press, San Diego, 1994, pp. 184-239.
[6] G. D. Logan and W. B. Cowan, “On the Ability to Inhibit Thought and Action: A Theory of an Act of Control,” Psychological Review, Vol. 91, No. 3, pp. 295-327. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.91.3.295
[7] F. Verbruggen and J. De Houwer, “Do Emotional Stimuli Interfere with Response Inhibition? Evidence from the Stop Signal Paradigm,” Cognition & Emotion, Vol. 21, No. 2, 2007, pp. 391-403. doi:10.1080/02699930600625081
[8] C. Herbert, M. Junghofer and J. Kissler, “Event related potentials to emotional adjectives during reading,” Psychophysiology, Vol. 45, No. 3, 2008, 487-498. doi:10.1111/j.1469-8986.2007.00638.x
[9] J. Kissler, C. Herbert, P. Peyk and M. Junghofer, “Buzzwords: Early Cortical Responses to Emotional Words during Reading,” Psychological Science, Vol. 18, No. 6, 2007, pp. 475-480. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.2007.01924.x
[10] H. T. Schupp, T. Flaisch, J. Stockburger and M. Junghofer, “Emotion and Attention: Event-Related Brain Potential Studies,” Progress in Brain Research, Vol. 156, 2006, pp. 31-51. doi:10.1016/S0079-6123(06)56002-9
[11] J. Kissler, R. Assadollahi and C. Herbert, “Emotional and Semantic Networks in Visual Word Processing: Insights from ERP Studies,” Progress in Brain Research, Vol. 156, 2006, pp. 147-183. doi:10.1016/S0079-6123(06)56008-X
[12] M. J. Hofmann, L. Kuchinke, S. Tamm, M. L. Vo and A. M. Jacobs, “Affective Processing within 1/10th of a Second: High Arousal Is Necessary for Early Facilitative Processing of Negative but not Positive Words,” Cognitive Affective and Behavioral Neuroscience, Vol. 9, No. 4, 2009, pp. 389-397. doi:10.3758/9.4.389
[13] M. C. Anderson and C. Green, “Suppressing Unwanted Memories by Executive Control,” Nature, Vol. 410, 2001, pp. 366-369. doi:10.1038/35066572
[14] M. C. Anderson and B. C. Levy, “Suppressing Unwanted Memories,” Current Directions in Psychological Science, Vol. 18, No. 4, 2009, pp. 189-194. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8721.2009.01634.x
[15] S. Konishi, K. Nakajima, I. Uchida, H. Kikyo, M. Kameyama, et al., ”Common Inhibitory Mechanisms in Human Inferior Prefrontal Cortex Revealed by Functional MRI,” Brain, Vol. 122, No. 5, 1999, pp. 981-991. doi:10.1093/brain/122.5.981
[16] C. R. Li, C. Huang, R. T. Constable and R. Sinha, “Imaging Response Inhibition in a Stop-Signal Task: Neural Correlates Independent of Signal Monitoring and Post- Response Processing,” The Journal of Neuroscience, Vol. 26, No. 1, 2006, pp. 186-192. doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3741-05.2006
[17] M. C. Anderson, K. N. Ochsner, B. Kuhl, J. Cooper, E. Robertson, S. W. Gabrieli, et al., “Neural Systems Underlying the Suppression of Unwanted Memories,” Science, Vol. 303, 2004, pp. 232-235. doi:10.1126/science.1089504
[18] L. Laux, P. Glanzmann, P. Schaffner and C. D. Spielberger, “Das State-Trait-Angstinventar (STAI),” Beltz, Weinheim, 1981.
[19] D. Watson, L. A. Clark and A. Tellegen, “Development and Validation of Brief Measures of Positive and Negative Affect: The PANAS Scales,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Vol. 54, No. 6, 1988, pp. 1063- 1070. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.54.6.1063
[20] R. H. Baayen, R. Piepenbrock and L. Gulikers, “The CELEX Lexical Database (CD-ROM),” Linguistic Data Consortium, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, 1995.
[21] M. M. Bradley and P. J. Lang, “Measuring Emotion: The Self-Assessment Manikin and the Semantic Differential,” Journal of Behavioral Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry, Vol. 25, No. 1, 1994, pp. 49-59. doi:10.1016/0005-7916(94)90063-9
[22] F. Verbruggen and G. D. Logan, “Long-Term Aftereffects of Response Inhibition: Memory Retrieval, Task Goals, and Cognitive Control,” Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, Vol. 34, No. 5, 2008, pp. 1229-1235. doi:10.1037/0096-1523.34.5.1229
[23] G. P. H. Band, M. W. van der Molen and G. D. Logan, “Horse-Race Model Simulations of the Stop-Signal Procedure,” Acta Psychologica, Vol. 112, No. 2, 2003, pp. 105-142. doi:10.1016/S0001-6918(02)00079-3
[24] J. A. Hinojosa, C. Méndez-Bértolo and M. A. Pozo, “Looking at Emotional Words Is Not The Same As Reading Emotional Words: Behavioral and Neural Correlates,” Psychophysiology, 2010.
[25] L. Pessoa, “How Do Emotion and Motivation Direct Executive Control?” Trends in Cognitive Science, Vol. 13, No. 4, 2009, pp. 160-166. doi:10.1016/j.tics.2009.01.006
[26] M. M. Bradley, ”Emotional Memory: A Dimensional Analysis, ” In: S. H. M. van Goozen, N. E. van de Poll and J. A. Sergeant, Eds., Emotions: Essays on Emotion Theory, Erlbaum, Hillsdale, 1994, pp. 97-134.
[27] F. Verbruggen and G. D. Logan, “Response Inhibition in the Stop-Signal Paradigm,” Trends in Cognitive Science, Vol. 12, No. 11, 2008, pp. 418-424. doi:10.1016/j.tics.2008.07.005

comments powered by Disqus

Copyright © 2020 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc.

Creative Commons License

This work and the related PDF file are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.