Statistical optimization of process variables by response surface methodology to enhance phenol degradation by Pseudomonas putida (NCIM 2102)

DOI: 10.4236/abb.2011.24028   PDF   HTML     5,519 Downloads   10,766 Views   Citations


Removal efficiency of phenol from aqueous solutions was determined using Pseudomonas putida (NCIM 2102). Experiments were made as a function of pH (4 - 9), temperature (28 - 36oC), and agitation speed (100 - 200 rpm). Optimization of these three process parameters for phenol degradation was studied. Statistically designed experiments using response surface methodology was used to get more information about the significant effects and the interactions between these three parameters. A 23 full-factorial central composite design was employed for experimental design and for analysis of the results. A second order polynomial regression model, has been developed using the experimental data. It was found that the degrading potential of P.putida (NCIM 2102) was strongly affected by the variations in pH, temperature and agitation speed. The experimental values were in good agreement with the predicted values and the correlation coefficient was found to be 0.9871. The optimum process conditions for maximizing phenol degradation were recognized as follows: pH (7.49), temperature (29.99oC), and agitation speed (138.89) rpm.

Share and Cite:

Sridevi, V. , Lakshmi, M. , Swamy, A. and Rao, M. (2011) Statistical optimization of process variables by response surface methodology to enhance phenol degradation by Pseudomonas putida (NCIM 2102). Advances in Bioscience and Biotechnology, 2, 175-181. doi: 10.4236/abb.2011.24028.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.


[1] Vera Lucia dos Santos, Andrea de Souza Monteiro, Danubia Telles Braga and Marcelo Matos Santoro, “Phenol degradation by Aureobasidium pullulans FE 13 isolated from industrial effluents”, Journal of Hazardous Materials, Vol. 161, 2009, pp.1413-1420.
[2] Gabriela Vazquez-Rodriguez, Cherif Ben Youssef and Julio Waissman- Vilanova, “Two-step modeling of the biodegradation of phenol by an acclimated activated sludge”, Chemical Engineering Journal, vol.117, 2006, pp. 245-252.
[3] M.H. Entezari, C. Petrier and P. Devidal, “Sonochemical degradation of phenol in water: a comparison of classical equipment with a new cylindrical reactor”, Ultrasonic Sonochemistry, vol. 10, 2003, pp. 103-108.
[4] T. Balasankar and S. Nagarajan, “Biodegradation of phenols by a plasmid free Bacillus Brevis”,Asian Journal of Microbiology, Biotechnology and Environmental Science, vol. 2, 2000, pp. 155-158.
[5] N.N. Mahamuni and A.B. Pandit, “Effect of additives on ultrasonic degradation of phenol”, Ultrasonic Sonochemistry, vol. 13 2005.
[6] T.M. Lesko, “Chemical Effects of Acoustic Cavitation”, Ph.D. Thesis, Institute of Technology, Pasadena, California, USA, 2004.
[7] V.L. Santos and V.R. Linardi, “Biodegradation of phenol by a filamentous fungi isolated from industrial effluents- identification and degradation potential”, Process Biochemistry, vol. 39, 2004, pp.1001-1006.
[8] B.A. Weir, “Dissertation Abstracts International Part B: Science and Engineering”, vol.51, 1991, pp. 338.
[9] M.H. Entezari and C. Petrier, “A combination of ultrasound and oxidative enzyme: sono-biodegradation of phenol”, Applied Catalysis B: Environmental, vol. 53, 2004, pp. 257- 263.
[10] H.Kobayashi and B.E. Rittmann, “Microbial removal of hazardous organic compounds”, Environmental Science & Technology, vol. 16, 1982, pp. 170A-183A.
[11] G.P. Prpich and A.J. Dauglis, “Enhanced biodegradation of phenol by a microbial consortium in a solid-liquid two-phase portioning bioreactor”, Biodegradation, vol. 16, 2005, pp. 329- 339.
[12] Ajay Singh and Owen P.Ward, “Biodegradation and Bioremediation, Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2004.
[13] N.Ruiz-Ordaz, J.C. Juarez Ramirez, H.Castonon-Gonzalez, A.R. Lara-Rodriguez, E. Christiani-Urbina and J. Galindez-Mayer, “Aerobic bioprocesses and bioreactors used for phenol degradation by free and immobilized cells”, In: S.G. Pandalai, Ed., Recent Research Developments in Biotechnology Bioengineering Research Signpost. Trivendrum, India, 2000, pp. 83-94.
[14] S.Y. Chang, C.T. Li, M.C. Chang and W.K. Shieh, “Batch phenol degradation by Candida tropicalis and its fusant”, Biotechnology and Bioengineering, vol.60, 1998, pp. 391-395.
[15] N. Ruiz-Ordaz, E. Hernandez-Manzano, J.C. Ruiz-Lagunez, E. Christiani-Urbina and J. Galindez- Mayer, “Growth kinetic model that describes the inhibitory lytic effects of phenol on Candida tropicalis yeast”, Biotechnology Progress, vol.14, 1998, pp.966-969.
[16] G.Paller, R.K. Hommel and H.P. Kleber, “Phenol degradation by Acinetobacter calcoaceticus NCIB 8250”, Journal of Basic Microbiology, vol. 35, 1995, pp.325-335.
[17] E.J. Hughes, R.C. Bayly and R.A. Skurray, “Evidence for isofunctional enzymes in the degradation of phenol, m- and p-toluate and p-cresol via catechol meta cleavage pathways in Alcaligenes eutrophus”, The Journal of Bacteriology, vol. 158, 1984, pp. 79-83.
[18] D. Leonard and N.D. Lindely, “Carbon and energy flux constraints in continuous cultures of Alicaligenes eutrophus grown on phenol”, Microbiology, vol.144, 1998, pp.241-248.
[19] G.A. Hill and C.W. Robinson, “Substrate inhibition kinetics: phenol degradation by Pseudomonas putida”, Biotechnology and Bioengineering, vol.17, 1975, pp. 1599-1615.
[20] G. Kotturi, C.W. Robinson and W.E. Inniss, “Phenol degradation by psychotrophic strain of Pseudomonas putida”, Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, vol. 34, 1991, pp. 539-543.
[21] B.R. Folsom, P.J. Champan and P.H. Pritchard, “Phenol and Trichloroethylene degradation by Pseudomonas cepacia G4: Kinetics and interactions between substrates”, Applied Environmental and Microbiology, vol. 56, 1990, pp. 1279-1285.
[22] B.O. Solomon, C. Posten, M.P.F. Harder, V. Hecht and W.D. Deckwer, “Energetics of Pseudomonas cepacia growth in a chemostat with phenol limitation”, Journal of Chemical Technology & Biotechnology, vol.60, 1994, pp. 275-282.
[23] M. Schroder, C. Muller, C. Posten, W.D. Deckwer and V. Hecht, “Inhibition kinetics of phenol degradation from unstable steady state data”, Biotechnology and Bioengineering, vol.54, 1997, pp. 567-576.
[24] M.M. Hoq, B.O. Soloman, C. Hempel, U. Rinas and W.D. Deckwer, “The kinetics of cellulose-free xylanase excretion by Thermomyces Langiosus RT9”, Journal of Chemical Technology & Biotechnology, vol.63, 1995, pp. 229- 236.
[25] S.C.B. Gopinath, A. Hilda, T. Lakshmipriya, G.Annadurai and P. Anbu, “Statistical optimization of amylase production by Aspergillus versicolor”, Asian Journal of Microbiology Biotechnology and Environmental Science, vol. 5, 2003, pp. 327-330.
[26] G.E.P. Box and D.W. Behnken, “Three level design for the study of quantitative variables”, Technometrics, vol.2, 1960, pp. 455-475.
[27] G.E.P. Box and J.S. Hunter, “Multi-factor experimental designs for exploring response surfaces”, Annals of Mathematical Statistics, vol.28, 1957, pp. 195-241.
[28] W.G. Cochran and D.W. Cox, “Experimental design”, John Wiley and Sons, Inc, New York, 1968, pp. 611-626.
[29] American Public Health Association (APHA) American Water Work Association, Water Pollution Control Federation, “Standards methods for the examination of water and wastewater”, 17th Edition, Washington DC, vol.55, 1989, pp. 9-62.

comments powered by Disqus

Copyright © 2020 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc.

Creative Commons License

This work and the related PDF file are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.