Response of coleoptiles to water deficit: growth, turgor maintenance and osmotic adjustment in barley plants (Hordeum vulgare L.)

DOI: 10.4236/as.2011.23022   PDF   HTML     6,681 Downloads   12,089 Views   Citations


Cereal crop improvement programmes involve the analysis of a great number of lines every year; the availability of a simple, rapid method that would allow the identification of a trait in the early stages of plant development would facilitate the selection process. This work reports two experiments involving the germination of seeds in Petri dishes, performed to study the effect of water deficit on the growth of barley coleoptiles. In one experiment water stress was induced by allowing evaporation from the Petri dishes; in the other water stress was achieved by adding polyethylene glycol 6000. The growth of the control coleoptiles was greater than that of the treatment coleoptiles in all cases, but with differences between the different genotypes. A significant correlation (P < 0.01) was found between the relative growth of the coleoptiles and turgor maintenance in the seedlings. Significant correlations were also seen between the relative growth of the coleop-tiles and the osmotic adjustment of the flag leaf (P < 0.05) and the grain weight (P < 0.01) in adult plants. The genotypes that showed the greatest relative growth also showed the greatest capacity for osmotic adjustment in the flag leaf and produced the greatest yields in experiments with adult plants. The results indicate that the growth of coleoptiles subjected to water deficit could be used as a selection criterion in breeding programmes designed to improve the tolerance of barley to drought.

Share and Cite:

González, Á. and Ayerbe, L. (2011) Response of coleoptiles to water deficit: growth, turgor maintenance and osmotic adjustment in barley plants (Hordeum vulgare L.). Agricultural Sciences, 2, 159-166. doi: 10.4236/as.2011.23022.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.


[1] González A, Bermejo V, Gimeno BS (2010). Effect of different physiological traits on grain yield in barley grown under irrigated and terminal water deficit conditions. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 148: 319-328
[2] Landjeva S, Korzun V, Stoimenova E, Truberg B, Ganeva G, B?rner A (2008). The contribution of gibberelling-in- sensitive semi-dwardfing (Rht) genes to genetic variation in wheat seedling growth in response to osmotic stress. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 146: 275- 286.
[3] Cannell RQ (1969) The tillering pattern in barley varieties: II. The effect of temperature light intensity and daylength on the frequency of occurrence of the coleoptile node and second tillers in barley. The Journal of Agricultural Scienc 72: 423-435.
[4] Onwueme I C, Laude H M (1972). Heat-induced growth retardation and attempts at its prevention in barley and wheat coleoptiles. The Journal of Agricultural Science 79: 331-333.
[5] Teulat B, Rekika D, Nachit MM, Monneveux P (1997). Comparative osmotic adjustments in barley and tetraploid wheats. Plant Breeding 116: 519-523.
[6] Zhang J, Nguyen HT, Blum A (1999). Genetic analysis of osmotic adjustment in crop plants. Journal of Experimental Botany 50: 291-302.
[7] Hamidou F, Zombre G, Braconnier S (2007). Physiological and Biochemical responses of cowpea genotypes to water deficit under glasshouse and field conditions. Journal of Agronomy & Crop Science 193: 229-237
[8] Ludlow MM, Muchow RC (1990). A critical evaluation of traits for improving crop yields in water-limited environments. Advances in Agronomy 43: 107-153.
[9] Morgan JM, Rodríguez-Maribona B, Knights EJ (1991): Adaptation to water-deficit in chickpea breeding lines by osmoregulation: relationship to grain-yields in the field. Field Crops Research 27: 61-70.
[10] Moinuddin, Khanna-Chopra R (2004). Osmotic adjustment in chickpea in relation to seed yield and yield parameters. Crop Science 44: 449-455
[11] Rodríguez-Maribona B, Tenorio JL, Conde JR, Ayerbe L (1992). Correlation between yield and osmotic adjustment of peas (Pisum sativum L.) under drought stress. Field Crops Research 29: 15-22.
[12] Ludlow MM, Santamaria JM, Fukai S (1990). Contribution of osmotic adjustment to grain yield in Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench under water-limited conditions. II. Water deficit after anthesis. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 41: 67-78.
[13] Santamaria JM, Ludlow MM, Fukai S (1990). Contribution of osmotic adjustment to grain yield in Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench under water-limited conditions. I. Water deficit before anthesis. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 41: 51-65.
[14] Morgan JM (1995). Growth and yield of wheat lines with differing osmoregulative capacity at high soil water deficit in seasons of varying evaporative demand. Field Crops Research 40:143-152.
[15] Blum A, Zhang J, Nguyen HT (1999). Consistent differences among wheat cultivars in osmotic adjustment and their relationship to plant production. Field Crops Research 64: 287-291.
[16] González A, Martín I, Ayerbe L (1999). Barley yield in water-stress conditions. The influence of precocity, osmotic adjustment and stomatal conductance. Field Crops Research 62: 23-34.
[17] González A, Martín I, Ayerbe L (2008). Yield and osmotic adjustment capacity of barley under terminal water deficit conditions. Journal of Agronomy & Crop Science 194: 81-91.
[18] Chimenti CA, Pearson J, Hall AJ (2002). Osmotic adjustment and yield maintenance under drought in sunflower. Field Crops Research 75: 235-246.
[19] Daneshmand F, Harvin MJ, Kalantari KM (2010). Physiological responses to NaCl stress in three wild species of potato in vitro. Acta Physiol Plant 32:91-101
[20] Morgan JM (1984). Osmoregulation and water deficit in higher plants. Annual Review of Plant Physiology 35: 299-319.
[21] Blum A (1989). Osmotic adjustment and growth of barley genotypes under drought stress. Crop Science 29: 230-233.
[22] Basu S, Roychoudhury A, Saha PP, Sengupta DN (2010). Comparative analysis of some biochemical responses of three indica rice varieties during polyethylene glycol- mediated water stress exhibits distinct varietal differences. Acta Physiol Plant 32: 551-563
[23] Moud AM, Maghsoudi K (2008). Application of coleoptile growth response method to differentiate osmoregulation capability of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) cultivars. Research Journal of Agronomy 2: 36-43.
[24] Murphy K, Balow K, Lyon SR, Jones SS (2008). Response to selection, combining ability and heritability of coleoptile length in winter wheat. Euphytica 164: 709- 718.
[25] Kato Y, Hirotsu S, Yamagishi J, Nemoto K (2008). Identification of QTLs controlling rice drought tolerance at seedling stage in hydroponic culture. Euphytica 160: 423-430.
[26] Rebetzke G, Ellis M, Bonnett D, Richards R (2007). Molecular mapping of genes for coleoptile growth in bread wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Theorical and Applied Genetics 114: 1173-1183.
[27] Morgan JM (1988). The use of coleoptile responses to water deficit to differentiate wheat genotypes for osmoregulation, growth and yield. Annals of Botany 62: 193-198.
[28] González A (2001). Estudio de caracteres fenológicos, agronómicos, morfológicos y fisiológicos en relación con tolerancia al estrés hídrico en cebada. PhD thesis, Universidad Complutense, Madrid.
[29] Zadoks JC, Chang TT, Kozank CF (1974). A decimal code for the growth stages of cereals. Weed Research 14, 415-421.
[30] Morgan J.M., 1983: Osmoregulation as a selection criterion for drought tolerance in wheat., Aust. J. Agric. Res. 34, 607-614.
[31] StatSoft (1997). Statistica 5.1. Tusla, USA: StatSoft. Dhanda SS, Sethi GS, Behl RK (2004). Indices of drought tolerance in wheat genotypes at early stages of plant growth. Journal of Agronomy & Crop Science 190: 6-12.
[32] Yagmur M, Kaydan D (2008). Early seedling growth and relative water content of triticale varieties under osmotic stress of water and NaCl. Research Journal of Agriculture and Biological Sciences 4: 767-772.
[33] Sánchez FJ, de Andrés EF, Tenorio JL, Ayerbe L (2004). Growth of epicotyls, turgor maintenance and osmotic adjustment in pea plants (Pisum sativum L.) subjected to water deficit. Field Crops Research 86: 81-90.
[34] Turner NC, Jones MM (1980). Turgor maintenance by osmotic adjustment: a review and evaluation. In: Turner NC and Kramer PJ (Eds). Adaptation of plants to water and high temperature stress 87-104.
[35] Kusaka M, Garcia Lalusin A, Fujimura T (2005). The maintenance of growth and turgor in pearl millet (Pennisetum glaucum [L.] Leeke) cultivars with different root structures and osmo-regulation under drought stress. Plant Science 168: 1-14.
[36] Guóth A, Benyó D, Csiszár J, Gallé A, Horváth F, Cseuz L, Erdei L, Tari I (2010). Relationship between osmotic stress-induced abscisic acid accumulation, biomass production and plant growth in drought-tolerant and sensitive wheat cultivars. Acta Physiol Plant 32:719-727.
[37] Chimenti CA, Hall AJ (1993). Genetic variation and changes with ontogeny of osmotic adjustment in sunflower (Helianthus annuus. L.). Euphytica 71: 201-210.

comments powered by Disqus

Copyright © 2020 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc.

Creative Commons License

This work and the related PDF file are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.