Economic Diversity and Employment Levels in Italian Provinces over the Period 1951-2001: Does a Recurrent Industrial Pattern Exist?

Alessandro Marra, Vittorio Carlei, Alessandro Crociata

.

DOI: 10.4236/me.2011.23049                

Abstract

Economic diversity is crucial to explain how geographic areas grow and evolve: economic diversity facilitates the transmission of ideas (through knowledge spillovers) and the outsourcing of activities (city-nurseries). In this paper we focus on these theoretical perspectives and examine the industry structure and growth of Italian provinces. We use data on employment levels in 47 economic sectors in 103 provinces and measure their degree of diversity over the period 1951-2001. By taking into account both provincial size (i.e., employment levels) and temporal dimension we test whether economic initiatives benefit from being localised in areas that are highly diversified from an industrial point of view. After confirming the relevance of economic diversity we investigate the industry pattern that boosted growth in the largest (in terms of number of employees) provinces in our sample. Our results confirm the Jacobs’ intuitions about how cities evolve and contribute to debate by reducing the gap between some Jacobs’ hypotheses and major theses.

Keywords

Economic Diversity, Industrial Pattern, Provincial Level

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

[1]	J. Jacobs, “The Economy of Cities,” Random House, New York, 1969.
[2]	F. M. Scherer, “Inter-Industry Technology Flows in the United States,” Research Policy, Vol. 11, No. 4, 1982, pp. 227-245. doi:10.1016/0048-7333(82)90011-7
[3]	P. Bairoch, “Cities and Economic Development: From the Dawn of History to the Present,” University of Chi- cago Press, Chicago, 1988.
[4]	B. J. Chinitz and R. Vernon, “Changing Forces in Industrial Location,” Harvard Business Review, Vol. 38, No. 1, 1960, pp. 126-136.
[5]	J. Jacobs, “Cities and the Wealth of Nations: Principles of Economic Life,” Random House, New York, 1984.
[6]	G. Duranton and D. Puga, “Diversity and Specialisation in Cities: Why, Where and When Does It Matter?” Urban Studies, Vol. 37, No. 3, 2000, pp. 533-555. doi:10.1080/0042098002104
[7]	G. Duranton and D. Puga, “Nursery Cities: Urban Diversity, Process Innovation, and the Life-Cycle of Products,” American Economic Review, Vol. 91, No. 5, 2001, pp. 1454-1477. doi:10.1257/aer.91.5.1454
[8]	J. V. Henderson, A. Kuncoro and M. Turner, “Industrial Development in Cities,” Journal of Political Economy, Vol. 103, No. 5, 1995, pp. 1067-1090. doi:10.1086/262013
[9]	J. Jacobs, “The Death and Life of Great American Cities,” Vintage Books, New York, 1961.
[10]	J. Jacobs, “Strategies for Helping Cities,” American Economic Review, Vol. 59, No. 4, 1969, pp. 652-656.
[11]	M. Attaran, “Industrial Diversity and Economic Per- formance in U.S. Areas,” Annals of Regional Science, Vol. 20, No. 2, 1986, pp. 44-54. doi:10.1007/BF01287240
[12]	P. Haug, “Diversifikation und Regionale Wirtschafts-und Besch?ftigungsentwicklung: Eine Empirische Analyse für Ausgew?hlte Deutsche Gebiete,” Jahrbuch für Regional- wissenschaft, Vol. 24, No. 2, 2004, pp. 177-195.
[13]	R. W. Bostic, J. S. Gans and S. Stern, “Urban Productivity and Factor Growth in the Late 19th Century,” Journal of Urban Economics, Vol. 4, No. 1, 1997, pp. 38-55. doi:10.1006/juec.1996.1087
[14]	T. Garcia-Mila and T. J. McGuire, “Industrial Mix as a Factor in the Growth and Variability of States’ Economies,” Regional Science and Urban Economics, Vol. 23, No. 6, 1993, pp. 731-748.
[15]	W. B. Arthur, “Silicon Valley Locational Clusters: Do In- Creasing Returns Imply Monopoly?” Mathematical So- cial Sciences, Vol. 19, 1990, pp. 235-251. doi:10.1016/0165-4896(90)90064-E
[16]	A. Ciccone and R. E. Hall, “Productivity and the Density of Economic Activity,” American Economic Review, Vol. 86, No. 1, 1996, pp. 54-70.
[17]	U. Lim, “Knowledge Externalities, Spatial Dependence, and Metropolitan Economic Growth in the United States,” Environmental and Planning A, Vol. 39, No. 4, 2007, pp. 771-788. doi:10.1068/a36260
[18]	N. A. Phelps, “From Branch Plant Economies to Knowl- edge Economies? Manufacturing Industry, Government Policy, and Economic Development in Britain’s Old In- dustrial Regions,” Environment and Planning C: Gov- ernment and Policy, Vol. 27, No. 4, 2009, pp. 574-592. doi:10.1068/c0870b
[19]	C. Beaudry and A. Shiffauerova, “Who’s Right, Marshall or Jacobs? The Localization versus Urbanization Debate,” Research Policy, Vol. 38, No. 2, 2009, pp. 318-337. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2008.11.010
[20]	N. Rosenberg, “Technological Change in the Machine Tool Industry, 1840-1910,” Journal of Economic History, Vol. 23, No. 4, 1963, pp. 414-443.
[21]	E. L. Glaeser, H. Kallal, J. Scheinkman and A. Shleifer, “Growth in Cities,” Journal of Political Economy, Vol. 100, No. 6, 1992, pp. 1126-1152. doi:10.1086/261856
[22]	E. M. Hoover, “The Location of Economic Activity. McGrawHill, New York. 1948. F. G. Van Oort, “Urban Growth and Innovation, Spatially Bounded Externalities in the Netherlands,” Ashgate, Aldershot, 2004.
[23]	S. P. Florence, “The Logic of British and American Industry,” Routledge, London, 1953.
[24]	B. J. Chinitz, “Contrasts in Agglomeration: New York and Pittsburgh,” American Economic Review, Vol. 51, 1961, pp. 279-89.
[25]	E. M. Hoover and R. Vernon, “Anatomy of a Metropolis. Cambridge,” Harvard University Press, Cambridge, 1959.
[26]	K. Frenken, F. G. van Oort and T. Verburg, “Related Va- riety, Unrelated Variety and Regional Economic Growth,” Regional Studies, Vol. 41, No. 5, 2007, pp. 685-697. doi:10.1080/00343400601120296