Periodic Solutions of a Class of Second-Order Differential Equation ()
Received 25 December 2015; accepted 26 February 2016; published 29 February 2016

1. Introduction and Statement of the Main Results
In this paper we shall study the existence of periodic solutions of the second-order differential equation of the form
(1)
where the dot denotes derivative with respect to the time t, and the functions
,
and
are periodic of period
in the variable t.
In a recent paper [3] (see also [4] [5] ), the second-order differential Equation (1) has been studied when
. A study of coupled quadratic unharmonic oscillators in terms of the Painlevé analysis and inte- grability can be seen in [6] , and studies on the second-order differential equations can be seen in [7] . Other approach to the periodic solutions of second-order differential equations can be found in [8] .
Here we study the periodic solutions of the second-order differential Equation (1) when
,
, and
with
. Our main results are the following ones.
Theorem 1. We define the functions
(2)
where
![]()
![]()
![]()
Assume that the functions
,
and
are
-periodic. Then for
sufficiently small and for every
solution of the system
for
, satisfy
(3)
the differential Equation (1) has a
-periodic solution
.
Theorem 1 is proved in section 3 using the averaging theory described in section 2. Two applications of Theorem 1 are the following.
Corollary 1. We consider the differential Equation (1) with
,
and
. Then for
sufficiently small, this differential equation has a
-periodic solution
.
Corollary 2. We consider the differential Equation (1) with
,
and
. Then for
sufficiently small, this differential equation has a
-periodic solution
.
Corollaries 1 and 2 are also proved in section 3.
Theorem 2. Assuming that
![]()
and setting
(4)
with
![]()
![]()
![]()
Assume that
,
and
are
-periodic functions. Then for
sufficiently small and for every
solution of the system
for
satisfy (3), the differential Equation (1) has a periodic solution
![]()
Theorem 2 is proved in section 4. Two applications of Theorem 2 are the following.
Corollary 3. We consider the differential Equation (1) with
,
and
. Then for
sufficiently small, this differential equation has a
-periodic solution
![]()
Corollary 4. We consider the differential Equation (1) with
,
and
. Then for
sufficiently small, this differential equation has a periodic solution
![]()
Corollaries 3 and 4 are also proved in section 4.
2. Basic Results on Averaging Theory
We state the results from the averaging method that we shall use for proving the results of this work.
We consider differential systems of the form
(5)
where
is a small parameter, and the functions
and
are
functions, T-periodic in the variable t, and
is an open subset of
. Suppose that the unperturbed system
(6)
has a submanifold of dimension n of T-periodic solutions, i.e. of periodic solutions of period T.
We denote by
the solution of system (6) such that
. We consider the first variational equation of system (6) on the periodic solution
, i.e.
(7)
where
is an
matrix. Let
the fundamental matrix of system (7) such that
is the identity matrix of
.
By assumption there exists an open set V such that
and for each
,
is T-periodic. Therefore we have the following result.
Theorem 3. We suppose that there is an open and bounded set V with
such that for each
, the solution
is T-periodic, and let
be the function defined by
(8)
If there is
with
and
, then there is a T-periodic solution
of system (5) satisfying
.
Theorem 3 is due to Malkin [9] and Roseau [10] , for a new and shorter proof (see [11] ).
3. Proof of Theorem 1 and Its Two Corollaries
Proof of Theorem 1. Introducing the variable
, we can write the second-order differential Equation (1) as the following first-order differential system
(9)
Doing the rescaling
, we obtain the system
(10)
System (10) with
is the unperturbed system, otherwise system (10) is the perturbed system. The unperturbed system has a unique singular point, the origin of coordinates. The solution
of the unperturbed system such that
is
![]()
Note that all these periodic orbits have period
. Using the notation introduced in section 2. We have that
,
,
,
and
.
The fundamental matrix solution
is independent of the initial condition
, and denoting it by
we obtain
![]()
Now we compute the function
given in (8), and we get the functions (2) of the statement of Theorem 1.
By Theorem 3 each zero
of system
satisfying (3), provides a
- periodic solution
of system (10) with
sufficiently small such that
![]()
Going back through the change of variables for every periodic solution
of system (10) with
sufficiently small, we obtain a
-periodic solution
of the differential Equation (1) with
sufficiently small. This completes the proof of Theorem 1. □
Proof of Corollary 1. We must apply Theorem 1 with
![]()
We compute the functions
and
of the statement of Theorem 1, and we obtain
![]()
System
has the zero
. Since the Jacobian (3) at this zero is
, we obtain using Theorem 1 the periodic solution given in the statement of the corollary. □
Proof of Corollary 2. We apply Theorem 1 with
![]()
Computing the functions
and
of Theorem 1 we get
![]()
System
has the zero
. Since the Jacobian (3) at this zero is
the corollary follows. □
4. Proof of Theorem 2 and Its Corollaries
Proof of Theorem 2. As in the proof of Theorem 1, the second-order differential Equation (1) can be written as the first order differential system (9). Doing the rescaling
, we obtain the system
(11)
System (11) with
is the unperturbed system, otherwise it is the perturbed system.
The solution
of the unperturbed system such that
is
![]()
Note that these periodic orbits have period
. Using the notation introduced in section 2. We have that
,
,
,
and
.
The fundamental matrix solution
is independent of the initial condition
and it is
![]()
We compute the function
given in (8), and we get the functions (4) of the statement of Theorem 2.
By Theorem 3, each zero
of system
satisfying (3), provides a
- periodic solution
of system (11) with
sufficiently small such that
![]()
Going back through the change of variables for every periodic solution
of system (11) with
sufficiently small, we obtain a
-periodic solution
![]()
of the differential Equation (1) for
sufficiently small. This completes the proof of Theorem 2. □
Proof of Corollary 3. We apply Theorem 2 with
![]()
We compute the functions
and
of the statement of Theorem 2, and we obtain
![]()
System
has the solution
. Since the Jacobian (3) is
, by Theorem 2 we obtain the periodic solution of the statement of the corollary. □
Proof of Corollaryc 4. We apply Theorem 2 with
![]()
We compute the functions
and
of the statement of Theorem 2, and we obtain
![]()
System
has the solution
. Since the Jacobian (3) is
, by Theorem 2 we obtain the periodic solution of the statement of the corollary. □
Acknowledgements
The second author is partially supported by a MINECO grant MTM2013-40998-P, an AGAUR grant number 2014SGR568, and the grants FP7-PEOPLE-2012-IRSES 318999 and 316338.