Inverse Spectral Theory for a Singular Sturm Liouville Operator with Coulomb Potential ()
Received 21 September 2015; accepted 18 January 2016; published 21 January 2016

1. Introduction
The Sturm-Liouville equation is a second order linear ordinary differential equation of the form
(1.1)
for some
and
. It was first introduced in an 1837 publication [1] by the eminent French mathematicians Joseph Liouville and Jacques Charles François Sturm. The Sturm-Liouville Equation (1.1) can easily be reduced to form
(1.2)
If we assume that p(x) has a continuous first derivative, and p(x), r(x) have a continuous second derivative, then by means of the substitutions

where c is given by

Equation (1.1) assumes the form (1.2) replaced by
; where

The transformation of the general second order equation to canonical form and the asymptotic formulas for the eigenvalues and eigenfunctions was given by Liouville. A deep study of the distribution of the zeros of eigenfunctions was done by Sturm. Firstly, the formula for the distribution of the eigenvalues of the single dimensional Sturm operator defined in the whole of the straight-line axis with increasing potential in the infinity was given by Titchmarsh in 1946 [2] [3] . Titchmarsh also showed the distribution formula for the Schrödinger Operator. In later years, Levitan improved the Titchmarsh’s method and found important asymptotic formula for the eigenvalues of different differential operators [4] [5] . Sturm-Liouville problems with a singularity at zero have various versions. The best known case is the one studied by Amirov [6] [7] , in which the potential has a Coulomb-type singularity

at the origin. In these works, properties of spectral characteristic were studied for Sturm-Liouville operators with Coulomb potential, which have discontinuity conditions inside a finite interval. Panakhov and Sat estimated nodal points and nodal lengths for the Sturm-Liouville operators with Coulomb potential [8] -[10] . Basand Metin defined a fractional singular Sturm-Liouville operator having Coulomb potential of type A/x [11] .
Let’s give some fundamental physical properties of the Sturm-Liouville operator with Coulomb potential. Learning about the motion of electrons moving under the Coulomb potential is of significance in quantum theory. Solving these types of problems provides us with finding energy levels of not only hydrogen atom but
also single valance electron atoms such as sodium. For the Coulomb potential is given by
, where r
is the radius of the nucleus, e is electronic charge. According to this, we use time-dependent Schrödinger equation

where
is the wave function, h is Planck’s constant and m is the mass of electron.
In this equation, if the Fourier transform is applied

it will convert to energy equation dependent on the situation as follows:

Therefore, energy equation in the field with Coulomb potential becomes

If this hydrogen atom is substituted to other potential area, then energy equation becomes
![]()
If we make the necessary transformation, then we can get a Sturm-Liouville equation with Coulomb potential
![]()
where
is a parameter which corresponds to the energy [12] .
Our aim here is to find asymptotic formulas for singular Sturm-Liouville operatör with Coulomb potential with domain
~
Also, we give the normalizing eigenfunctions and spectral functions.
2. Basic Properties
We consider the singular Sturm-Liouville problem
(2.1)
where the function
. Let us denote by
the solution of (2.1) satisfying the initial condition
(2.2)
and by
the solution of same equation, satisfying the initial condition
(2.3)
Lemma 1. The solution of problem (2.1) and (2.2) has the following form:
(2.4)
where
.
Proof. Since
satisfies Equation (2.1), we have
![]()
Integrating the first integral on the right side by parts twice and taking the conditions (2.2) into account, we find that
![]()
which is (2.4).
Lemma 2. The solution of problem (2.1) and (2.3) has the following form:
(2.5)
Proof. The proof is the same as that of Lemma 1.
Now we give some estimates of
and
which will be used later. For each fixed x in [0, 1] the map
is an entire function on
which is real-valued on
[13] . Using the estimate
![]()
we get
![]()
Since
and
![]()
we have
(2.6)
From (2.6) the inequality is easily checked
(2.7)
where c is uniform with respect to q on bounded sets in
.
Lemma 3 (Counting Lemma). [13] Let
and
be an integer. Then
has exactly N roots, counted with multiplicities, in the open half plane
![]()
and for each
, exactly one simple root in the egg shaped region
![]()
There are no other roots.
From this Lemma there exists an integer N such that for every
there is only one
eigenvalue in
Thus for every ![]()
(2.8)
can be chosen independent of q on bounded sets of
. Following theorem [13] shows that the eigenvalues
are the zeroes of the map
and these zeroes are simple.
Theorem 1. If
is Dirichlet eigenvalue of q in
, then
![]()
In particular,
. Thus, all roots of
are simple.
Proof. The proof is similar as that of ([13] , Pöschel and Trubowitz).
3. Asymptotic Formula
We need the following lemma for proving the main result.
Lemma 4. For every f in
,
(3.1)
and
. (3.2)
Proof. Firstly, we shall prove the relation (3.1)
(3.3)
By the Cauchy-Schwarz inequality, we get
.
Since f is in
, the last two integrals are equal to
![]()
So (3.3) is equivalent to
.
Finally, we shall prove the relation (3.2)
![]()
This proves the lemma.
The main result of this article is the following theorem:
Theorem 2. For
,
.
Proof of the Main Theorem. Since
it must be
. Because
is a nontrivial solution of Equation (2.1) satisfying Dirichlet boundary conditions, we have
(3.4)
From (2.7) someone gets the inequality
(3.5)
From (3.5) integral in the equation of (3.4) takes the form
![]()
By using difference formulas for sine we have
![]()
From Lemma 4 we get
![]()
Thus, by using this inequality (3.4) can be written in the form
(3.6)
From (2.8) we conclude that
(3.7)
Since
and
, (3.7) is equivalent to
.
So we get
. (3.8)
From (2.8) we have
![]()
In this case, the theorem is proved.
From this theorem, the map
![]()
from q to its sequences of Dirichlet eigenvalues sends
into S. Later, we need this map to characterize spectra which is equivalent to determining the image of
.
4. Inverse Spectral Theory
To each eigenvalue we associate a unique eigenfunction
normalized by
![]()
Let’s define the normalizing eigenfunction
:
![]()
Lemma 5. For
,
![]()
This estimate holds uniformly on bounded subsets of
.
Proof. Let
and
. By the basic estimate for
,
![]()
By using this estimate we have
![]()
So we get
![]()
Thus we conclude that
![]()
Dividing
by
we get
.
Also, we need to have asymptotic estimates of the squares of the eigenfunctions and products
![]()
Lemma 6. For
,
![]()
This estimate holds uniformly on bounded subsets of
.
Proof. We know that
![]()
By the basic estimate for
, we have
![]()
Hence,
![]()
Let
.
The map
is real analytic on
. Now we give asymptotic behavior for
.
Theorem 3. Each
is a compact, real analytic function on
with
(4.1)
Its gradient is
(4.2)
The error terms are uniform on bounded subsets of
.
Proof. From [14] we have
![]()
So we calculate the integral
![]()
Finally, since
, we get
(4.3)
By the Cauchy-Schwarz inequality, we prove the theorem.
Let
![]()
Formula (4.3) shows that
belongs to
. By Theorem 3, the map
![]()
from q to its sequences of
-values maps
into the
. So we obtain a map
![]()
from
into the
.
Theorem 4. [13]
is one-to-one on
.
Let
be the Frechet derivative of the map
at q.
Theorem 5. [14]
is an isomorphism from
onto
.