The common physical origin of the glass transition, macromolecular entanglement and turbulence
Jia-lin WU
DOI: 10.4236/ns.2011.37081   PDF   HTML     5,453 Downloads   10,026 Views   Citations


The interface excitation (IE) on intermolecular interface is a common concept connecting the glass transition (GT), macromolecular entan-glement (ME), and turbulence. IE has an addi-tional repulsion energy and extra vacancy vol-ume that result from the two neighboring molecules with antiparallel delocalization all in, e.g., the z-axial ground state of single-molecule instantaneous polarized dipole at GT. IEs only occur in the 8 orders of 2D IE loop-flows on lo-cal x-y projection plane. Theoretical proof of the 3.4 power law of ME viscosity reveals that (i) the delocalization mode of GT and solid-liquid tran-sition is solitary wave; wave- particle duality of solitary wave is ascribed to the equal probabili-ties between appearing and disappearing of IE loop-flow in inverse cascade and cascade mode; (ii) macromolecular chain-length in ME motion corresponds to Reynolds number in hydrody-namics; both the ME motion and the turbulent flow obey the same scale law. IE is not the ex-citation of dipole energy level at GT. However, when IEs are associated with the energy levels of instantaneous polarized dipole, we predict that the coherent structure formed by multilevel 8 orders of 2D IE loop-flows is the physical ori-gin of turbulence based on the universal ran-dom delocalization transition theory.

Share and Cite:

WU, J. (2011) The common physical origin of the glass transition, macromolecular entanglement and turbulence. Natural Science, 3, 580-593. doi: 10.4236/ns.2011.37081.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.


[1] Lesieur, M., Yaglom, A. and David, F. (2002) The trends of turbulence. Springer, Berlin.
[2] Anderson, P.W. (1995) Through the Glass Lightly. Scence, 267, 1615-1616. doi:10.1126/science.267.5204.1615-e
[3] Berry, M.V. (1998) Foreword to “Global properties of simple quantum systems—Berry’s phase and others”.
[4] Kadanoff, L.P. (1991) Complex Structures from Simple Systems. Physics Today, 44, 9. doi:10.1063/1.2810017
[5] Rubinstein, M. and Colby, R.H. (2003) Polymer physics. New York Publisher, Oxford.
[6] Doi, M. and Edwards S.F. (1988) The theory of polymer dynamics. New York Publisher, Oxford.
[7] Aleiner, I.L., Altshuler, B.L. and Shlyapnikov, G.V. (2010) A finite-temperature phase transition for disordered weakly interacting bosons in one dimension. Nature Physics, 6, 900-904. doi:10.1038/nphys1758
[8] Wu, J.-L., Guan, D. and Quian, B. (1986) The characteristic behaviour of the stretch-orientation zone during high-speed PET spinning. International Polymer Proces- sing, 1, 25-31.
[9] Gennes, P.G. (2002) A simple picture for structural glasses. Comptes Rendus Physique, 3, 1263-1268. doi:10.1016/S1631-0705(02)01387-7
[10] Wu, J.-L. (2009) Unified model theory of the glass transition: (Part 1) intrinsic 8 orders of 2D mosaic geometric structure. Journal of Materials Science and Engineering, 3, 69-83.
[11] Lubchenko, V. and Wolynes, P.G. (2003) Origin of the boson peak and thermal conductivity plateau in low temperature glasses. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 100, 1515-1518. doi:10.1073/pnas.252786999
[12] Greaves, G.N., Meneau, F., Majérus, O., Jones, D.G. and Taylor, J. (2005) Identifying vibrations that destabilize crystals and characterize the glassy state. Science, 308, 1299-1302. doi:10.1126/science.1109411
[13] Zallen, R. (1983) The physics of amorphous solids. Wiley, New York.
[14] Wu, J.-L. (2009) Unified model theory of the glass transition: (Part 2) fixed point of self-similar Lennard-Jones potentials in the glass transition. Journal of Materials Science and Engineering, 3, 58-64.
[15] Wu, J.-L. (2009) Unified model theory of the glass transition: (Part 3) fixed point of second virial coefficients in the glass transition. Journal of Materials Science and Engineering, 3, 31-39.
[16] Laird, B.B. and Bembenek, S.D. (1996) Localization and the Glass Transition, Journal of Physics: Condensed Ma- tter, 8, Article ID: 9569. doi:10.1088/0953-8984/8/47/064
[17] Barkai, E., Naumov, E.A., Vainer, Yu.G., Bauer, M. and Kador, L. Levy (2003) Statistics for random single-mo- lecule line shapes in a glass. Physical Review Letters, 91, 1-4. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.91.075502
[18] Wu, J.-L. (2009) Unified model theory of the glass transition: (Part 4) theoretical proof of the standard WLF equation in the glass transition. Journal of Materials Science and Engineering, 3, 76-82.
[19] Mechler, S., Macht, M.-P., Schumacher, G., Zizak, I. and Wanderka, N. (2010) Frustration of the stable Zr-Ti-Ni quasicrystal as the basis of glass formation. Physical Review B, 81, 1-4. doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.81.180101
[20] Coslovich, D. and Pastore, G. (2007) Understanding fragility in supercooled Lennard-Jones mixtures: I. Locally preferred structures. Journal of Chemical Physics, 127, 1-13. doi:10.1063/1.2773716
[21] Shin, H.K. (2010) Vibrational relaxation of NO-(v = 1) in icosahedral (Ar) 12NO-clusters. Journal of Chemical Physics, 132, Article ID: 104302. doi:10.1063/1.3339385
[22] Tanaka, H. (2003) Roles of local icosahedral chemical ordering in glass and quasicrystal formation in metallic glass formers. Journal Physics: Condensed Matter, 15, 491-498. doi:10.1088/0953-8984/15/31/102
[23] Jain, T.S. and de Pablo, J.J. (2005) Local structure and motions in a supercooled polymer. Journal of Chemical Physics, 122, Article ID: 174515. doi:10.1063/1.1888505
[24] Lubchenko, V. and Wolynes, P.G. (2003) Barrier softening near the onset of nonactivated transport in supercooled liquids: Implications for establishing detailed con- nection between thermodynamic and kinetic anomalies in supercooled liquids. Journal of Chemical Physics, 119, Article ID: 9088. doi:10.1063/1.1614180
[25] Reichl, L.E. (1980) A modern course in statistical physics. University of Texas Press, Dallas.
[26] Pathria, R.K. (1977) Statistical mechanics. Pergamon Press, Oxford.
[27] Williams, G. and Watts, D.C. (1970) Non-symmetrical dielectric relaxation behavior arising from a simple empirical decay function. Transactions of the Faraday Society, 66, 80-85. doi:10.1039/tf9706600080
[28] Physics Survey Committal (1986) Physics through the 1990s, condensed-matter physics. National Academy, Washington.
[29] Frisch, U. (1995) Turbulence. Cambridge University, Cambridge.
[30] de Gennes, P.G. (1985) Scaling concepts in polymer physics. Cornell University, New York.
[31] Lubchenko, V. and Wolynes, P.G. (2001) Intrinsic quantum excitations of low temperature glasses. Physical Review Letters, 87, 1-4. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.87.195901
[32] Kent, J.A. (2007) Riegel’s handbook of industrial chemistry and biotechnology. Vol. 1, 11th Edition, Springer, New York.
[33] Frank, H.P. (1986) Polypropylene. Gordon and Breach Science, New York.
[34] Zhao, D., Fan, Q., Quian, R. and Xiu, D. (1981) Relationship between the zero shear rate viscosities of PP melt and its viscosity average molecular weights. Bulletin of Macromolecula, 5, 385-388.
[35] Wright, W.B., Budakian, R., Pine, D.J. and Putterman, S.J. (1997) Imaging of intermittency in ripple-wave turbulence. Science, 278, 1609-1216. doi:10.1126/science.278.5343.1609
[36] Vassilicos, J.C. (2001) Intermittency in turbulence flows. Cambridge University, Cambridge, 44-63.

Copyright © 2023 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc.

Creative Commons License

This work and the related PDF file are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.