Share This Article:

Missing Amplification Effect: Focusing Missing Leads to Low Happiness Experience

Abstract Full-Text HTML XML Download Download as PDF (Size:455KB) PP. 2171-2187
DOI: 10.4236/psych.2015.616214    4,330 Downloads   4,708 Views  
Author(s)    Leave a comment


Prospect theory study found that people’s perception of the loss was greater than the strength obtained (Kahneman & Tversky, 1979), and the cognitive processes of “priority processing trend of negative events” thought that negative events would be priority processing than positive events (Huang & Luo, 2009). Researchers infer that when people focus on the lack of real life, it will produce the missing amplification effect, and this will further affect people’s well-being experiences. We used three experiments to test our hypotheses. Experiment 1 was between subjects design, and found that focusing missing was widespread, in addition, focusing missing and happy experience were negative correlation; Experiment 2 was picture experiment, and found that “missing amplification effect” existed. The greater the missing amplified effect, the lower the happiness; Experiment 3 merged experiment 1 and experiment 2, And found that the intermediary role between focusing missing and happy experience. Through the above three experiments, we concluded that: focusing missing leaded low happy experience, and missing amplification effect was the psychological mechanisms to explain why the focusing missing leaded to the low happy experience.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Cite this paper

Fei, T. (2015) Missing Amplification Effect: Focusing Missing Leads to Low Happiness Experience. Psychology, 6, 2171-2187. doi: 10.4236/psych.2015.616214.


[1] Demerouti, E., Bakker, A. B., & Bulters, A. J. (2004). The Loss Spiral of Work Pressure, Work—Home Interference and Exhaustion: Reciprocal Relations in a Three-Wave Study. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 64, 131-149.
[2] Diener, E. D., Emmons, R. A., Larsen, R. J., & Griffin, S. (1985). The Satisfaction with Life Scale. Journal of Personality Assessment, 49, 71-75.
[3] Hayes, A. F. (2013). An Introduction to Mediation, Moderation, and Conditional Process Analysis: A Regression-Based Approach. New York: Guilford Press.
[4] Huang, Y. X., & Luo, Y. J. (2009). Can Negative Stimuli Always Have the Processing Superiority? Acta Psychologica Sinica, 41, 822-831.
[5] Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1979). Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decision under Risk. Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society, 47, 263-291.
[6] Kahneman, D., Krueger, A. B., Schkade, D., Schwarz, N., & Stone, A. A. (2006). Would You Be Happier If You Were Richer? A Focusing Illusion. Science, 312, 1908-1910.
[7] Propper, C., & Wilson, D. (2003). The Use and Usefulness of Performance Measures in the Public Sector. Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 19, 250-267.
[8] Preacher, K. J., & Hayes, A. F. (2004). SPSS and SAS Procedures for Estimating Indirect Effects in Simple Mediation Models. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 36, 717-731.
[9] Rozin, P., & Royzman, E. B. (2001). Negativity Bias, Negativity Dominance, and Contagion. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 5, 296-320.
[10] Radel, R., & Clement-Guillotin, C. (2012). Evidence of Motivational Influences in Early Visual Perception: Hunger Modulates Conscious Access. Psychological Science, 23, 232-234.
[11] Schkade, D. A., & Kahneman, D. (1998). Does Living in California Make People Happy? A Focusing Illusion in Judgments of Life Satisfaction. Psychological Science, 9, 340-346.
[12] Sandberg, D. E. (2007). Focusing Illusion: Wealth, Height, and Happiness. Growth, Genetics & Hormones, 23, 27-28.
[13] Shah, A. K., Mullainathan, S., & Shafir, E. (2012). Some Consequences of Having Too Little. Science, 338, 682-685.
[14] Wilson, T. D., Wheatley, T., & Meyers, J. M., (2000). Focalism: A Source of Durability Bias in Affective Forecasting. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78, 821-836.

comments powered by Disqus

Copyright © 2020 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc.

Creative Commons License

This work and the related PDF file are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.