Tax Evasion Dynamics via Non-Equilibrium Model on Complex Networks

DOI: 10.4236/tel.2015.56089   PDF   HTML   XML   4,166 Downloads   4,553 Views   Citations


The Zaklan model has become an excellent mechanism to control the tax evasion fluctuations (TEF) in a people- or agent-based community. Initially, the equilibrium Ising model (IM) had been used as a dynamic of temporal evolution of the Zaklan model near the critical point of the IM. On some complex network the IM presents no critical points or well-defined phase transitions. Then, through Monte Carlo simulations we study the recurring problem of the TEF control using the version of non-equilibrium Zaklan model as a control mechanism for TEF via agent-based non-equilibrium majority-vote model (MVM). Here we study the TEF on directed Barabási-Albert (BAD) and Apollonian (ANs) networks where the IM is not applied. We show that the Zaklan model can be also studied using non-equilibrium dynamics through of the non-equilibrium MVM on complex topologies cited above, giving the behavior of the TEF regardless of dynamic or topology used here.

Share and Cite:

Lima, F. (2015) Tax Evasion Dynamics via Non-Equilibrium Model on Complex Networks. Theoretical Economics Letters, 5, 775-783. doi: 10.4236/tel.2015.56089.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.


[1] Stauffer, D., de Oliveira, S.M., de Oliveira, P.M.C. and Martins, J.S.S. (2006) Biology, Sociology, Geology by Computational Physicists. Elsevier, Amsterdam.
[2] Galam, S. (2012) Sociophysics: A Physicist’s Modeling of Psycho-Political Phenomena. Springer, Berlin-Heidelberg.
[3] Ball, P. (2012) Why Society Is a Complex Matter? Springer, Berlin-Heidelberg.
[4] Helbing, D. (2012) Social Self-Organization: Agent-Based Simulations and Experiments to Study Emergent Social Behavior. Springer, Berlin-Heidelberg.
[5] Sen, P. and Chakrabarti, B.K. (2014) Sociophysics—An Introduction. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
[6] Latané, B. (1981) The Psychology of Social Impact. American Psychologist, 36, 343.
[7] Zaklan, G., Westerhoff, F. and Stauffer, D. (2008) Analysing Tax Evasion Dynamics via the Ising Model. Journal of Economic Interaction and Coordination, 4, 1.
[8] Zaklan, G., Lima, F.W.S. and Westerhoff, F. (2008) Controlling Tax Evasion Fluctuations. Physica A, 387, 5857.
[9] Stauffer, D. (2013) A Biased Review of Sociophysics. Journal of Statistical Physics, 151, 9.
[10] Bloomquist, K. (2006) A Comparison of Agent-Based Models of Income Tax Evasion. Social Science Computer Review, 24, 411.
[11] Follmer, H. (1974) Random Economies with Many Interacting Agents. Journal of Mathematical Economics, 1, 51-62.
[12] Andreoni, J., Erard, B. and Feinstein, J. (1998) Tax Compliance. Journal of Economic Literature, 36, 818-860.
[13] Lederman, L. (2003) The Interplay between Norms and Enforcement in Tax Compliance. Public Law Research Paper No. 49.
[14] Slemrod, J. (2007) Cheating Ourselves: The Economics of Tax Evasion. Journal of Economic Perspective, 21, 25-48.
[15] Wintrobe, R. and Gerxhani, K. (2004) Tax Evasion and Trust: A Comparative Analysis. Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the European Public Choice Society, Berlin, 15-18 April 2004.
[16] Gachter, S. (2006) Conditional Cooperation: Behavioral Regularities from the Lab and the Field and Their Policy Implications. Discussion Papers 2006-03 CeDEx, University of Nottingham, Nottingham.
[17] Frey, B.S. and Togler, B. (2006) Tax Evasion, Black Activities and Deterrence in Germany: An Institutional and Empirical Perspective. IEW-Working Papers 286, Institute for Empirical Research in Economics, University of Zurich, Zurich.
[18] Lima, F.W.S. (2010) Analysing and Controlling the Tax Evasion Dynamics via Majority-Vote Model. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 246, Article ID: 012033.
[19] Lima, F.W.S. (2012) Controlling the Tax Evasion Dynamics via Majority-Vote Model on Various Topologies. Theoretical Economics Letters, 2, 87-93.
[20] Oliveira, M.J. (1992) Isotropic Majority-Vote Model on a Square Lattice. Journal of Statistical Physics, 66, 273-281.
[21] Andrade, R.S.F. and Herrmann, H.J. (2005) Magnetic Models on Apollonian Networks. Physical Review E, 71, Article ID: 056131.
[22] Andrade, R.S.F., Andrade Jr., J.S. and Herrmann, H.J. (2009) Ising Model on the Apollonian Network with Node-Dependent Interactions. Physical Review E, 79, Article ID: 036105.
[23] Sumour, M.A. and Shabat, M.M. (2005) Monte Carlo Simulation of Ising Model on Directed Barabasi-Albert Networks. International Journal of Modern Physics C, 16, 585-589.
[24] Aleksiejuk, A., Holyst, J.A. and Stauffer, D. (2002) Ferromagnetic Phase Transition in Barabási-Albert Networks. Physica A, 310, 260-266.
[25] Albert, R., Jeong, H. and Barabási, A.-L. (1999) Internet: Diameter of the World-Wide Web. Nature, 401, 130-131.
[26] Watts, D.J. and Strogatz, S.H. (1998) Collective Dynamics of “Small-World” Networks. Nature, 393, 440-442.
[27] Lima, F.W.S., Moreira, A.A. and Araújo, A.D. (2012) Nonequilibrium Model on Apollonian Networks. Physical Review E, 86, Article ID: 056109.

comments powered by Disqus

Copyright © 2020 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc.

Creative Commons License

This work and the related PDF file are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.