Retrospective Study of the Use of a Fractional Radio Frequency Ablative Device in the Treatment of Acne Vulgaris and Related Acne Scars

Judith Hellman

Mt. Sinai Hospital, New York, USA.

DOI: 10.4236/jcdsa.2015.54038                

Abstract

Background: Acne vulgaris (AV) is a common disease that often results in disfiguring facial scarring that carries into adulthood. Here we report our experience with fractional radiofrequency (FRF) device in treatment of patients with acne and acne related scarring. Materials & Methods: We retrospectively reviewed the charts of all patients with acne scarring who completed a four treatment regimen in our clinic. Results: We identified eight patients who completed four treatments with median age of 20.5 years (range 17 - 41). All patients demonstrated significant improvement of acne lesions and acne scarring. Skin biopsies demonstrated reduction of scar depth and increased new collagen production, and repopulation of the scar tissue by elastic fibers and adnexal structures after the fourth treatment. Conclusion: FRF emerges as a safe and effective treatment modality for AV and acne related scars. Further randomized controlled studies are required to fully evaluate the magnitude of this positive effect and more basic science studies are needed in order to better characterize its mechanism of action on acne lesions.

Keywords

Acne Vulgaris, Radiofrequency, Scarring

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

[1]	Rivera, A.E. (2008) Acne Scarring: A Review and Current Treatment Modalities. Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology, 59, 659-676. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jaad.2008.05.029
[2]	Thomas, D.R. (2004) Psychosocial Effects of Acne. Journal of Cutaneous Medicine and Surgery, 8, 3-5. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10227-004-0752-x
[3]	Del Rosso, J.Q. and Kircik, L.H. (2013) The Sequence of Inflammation, Relevant Biomarkers, and the Pathogenesis of Acne Vulgaris: What Does Recent Research Show and What Does It Mean to the Clinician? Journal of Drugs in Dermatology: JDD, 12, s109-s115.
[4]	Fabbrocini, G., Annunziata, M.C., D’Arco, V., et al. (2010) Acne Scars: Pathogenesis, Classification and Treatment. Dermatology Research and Practice, 2010, Article ID: 893080. http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2010/893080
[5]	Goodman, G.J. (2011) Treatment of Acne Scarring. International Journal of Dermatology, 50, 1179-1194. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-4632.2011.05029.x
[6]	Lolis, M.S. and Goldberg, D.J. (2012) Radiofrequency in Cosmetic Dermatology: A Review. Dermatologic Surgery, 38, 1765-1776. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1524-4725.2012.02547.x
[7]	Alam, M., Han, S., Pongprutthipan, M., et al. (2014) Efficacy of a Needling Device for the Treatment of Acne Scars: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Dermatology, 150, 844-849. http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/jamadermatol.2013.8687
[8]	Ruiz-Esparza, J. and Gomez, J.B. (2003) Nonablative Radiofrequency for Active Acne Vulgaris: The Use of Deep Dermal Heat in the Treatment of Moderate to Severe Active Acne Vulgaris (Thermotherapy): A Report of 22 Patients. Dermatologic Surgery, 29, 333-339; discussion 9.
[9]	Perkins, A.C., Cheng, C.E., Hillebrand, G.G., Miyamoto, K. and Kimball, A.B. (2011) Comparison of the Epidemiology of Acne Vulgaris among Caucasian, Asian, Continental Indian and African American Women. Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology: JEADV, 25, 1054-1060. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-3083.2010.03919.x
[10]	Fitzpatrick, T.B. (1988) The Validity and Practicality of Sun-Reactive Skin Types I through VI. Archives of Dermatology, 124, 869-871. http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/archderm.1988.01670060015008