Proportion of Cesarean Deliveries According to Hospital Funding in São Paulo Metropolitan Area, Brazil

DOI: 10.4236/ojog.2015.514113   PDF   HTML   XML   3,563 Downloads   3,923 Views   Citations


Introduction: There has been an increase in the proportion of cesarean deliveries, especially in developing countries. Methods: Cross-sectional study of all hospital live births from mothers living in Sao Paulo Metropolitan Area, Brazil. Data were obtained from the Live Birth Information System, which is linked to the National Database of Health Establishments. Hospitals were classified as public, private or mixed. Descriptive analysis and exponential regression were conducted to evaluate time trends. Poisson regression was applied to analyze each hospital type to identify risk factors and the attributable risk fraction for cesarean section. Results: There was an annual increase (1.4%) of cesarean deliveries between 2000 and2013. In2009, the percentage of cesarean deliveries was 53% overall and 83% in private hospitals. The primary risk factor for cesarean delivery was delivery in a private hospital. Other risk factors that were stronger in public hospitals included the following: advanced maternal age, high maternal education, nulliparity, high number of prenatal visits, multiple pregnancy, hospital with low annual volume of deliveries, birth outside the city of residence and white skin color. Discussion: These results may be explained by the obstetric care model of private hospitals, which is not multiprofessional. Prenatal care and delivery are conducted by the same doctor and rarely include the input of another professional, such as a midwife. In addition, the mode of delivery influences the professional’s payment.

Share and Cite:

Raspantini, P. , da Silva, Z. , Alencar, G. , Moura, B. , do Nascimento, F. , Rodrigues, L. , dos Santos, P. and de Almeida, M. (2015) Proportion of Cesarean Deliveries According to Hospital Funding in São Paulo Metropolitan Area, Brazil. Open Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 5, 799-807. doi: 10.4236/ojog.2015.514113.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.


[1] Gibbons, L., Belizán, J.M., Lauer, J.A., Betrán, A.P., Merialdi, M. and Althabe, F. (2010) The Global Numbers and Costs of Additionally Needed and Unnecessary Caesarean Sections Performed per Year: Overuse as a Barrier to Universal Coverage. World Health Report, 30.
[2] Villar, J., Valladares, E., Wojdyla, D., Zavaleta, N., Carroli, G., Velazco, A., et al. (2006) Caesarean Delivery Rates and Pregnancy Outcomes: The 2005 WHO Global Survey on Maternal and Perinatal Health in Latin America. Lancet, 367, 1819-1829.
[3] Henderson, J., McCandlish, R., Kumiega, L. and Petrou, S. (2011) Systematic Review of Economic Aspects of Alternative Modes of Delivery. BJOG, 8, 149-157.
[4] Domingues, R.M.S.M., Dias, M.A.B., Nakamura-Pereira, M., Torres, J.A., D’Orsi, E., et al. (2014) Process of Decision-Making Regarding the Mode of Birth in Brazil: From the Initial Preference of Women to the Final Mode of Birth. Cadernos de Saúde Pública, 30, S1-S16.
[5] Althabe, F. and Belizan, J.F. (2006) Caesarean Section: The Paradox. Lancet, 368, 1472-1473.
[6] Torres, J.A., Domingues, R.M.S.M., Sandall, J., Hartz, Z., Gama, S.G.N., et al. (2014) Caesarean Section and Neonatal Outcomes in Private Hospitals in Brazil: Comparative Study of Two Different Perinatal Models of Care. Cadernos de Saúde Pública, 30, S1-S12.
[7] Mazzoni, A., Althabe, F., Liu, N., Bonotti, A., Gibbons, L., Sánchez, A. and Belizan, J. (2011) Women’s Preference for Caesarean Section: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Observational Studies. BJOG, 118, 391-399.
[8] Paim, J., Travassos, C., Almeida, C., Bahia, L. and Macinko, J. (2011) The Brazilian Health System: History, Advances, and Challenges. Lancet, 377, 1778-1797.
[9] Hopkins, K., de Lima Amaral, E.F. and Mourao, A.N. (2014) The Impact of Payment Source and Hospital Type on Rising Cesarean Section Rates in Brazil, 1998 to 2008. Birth, 41, 169-177.
[10] World Health Organization (1985) Appropriate Technology for Birth. Lancet, 2, 436-437.
[11] Padua, K.S., Osis, M.J.D., Faundes, A., Barbosa, A.H. and Moraes, O.B. (2010) Factors Associated with Cesarean Sections in Brazilian Hospitals. Revista de Saúde Pública, 44, 70-79.
[12] Barros, A.J.D., Santos, I.S., Matijasevich, A., Domingues, M.R., Silveira, M., Barros, F.C. and Victora, C.G. (2011) Patterns of Deliveries in a Brazilian Birth Cohort: Almost Universal Cesarean Sections for the Better-Off. Revista de Saúde Pública, 45, 635-643.
[13] Behague, D.P., Victora, C.G. and Barros, F.C. (2002) Consumer Demand for Caesarean Sections in Brazil: Informed Decision Making, Patient Choice or Social Inequality? A Population Based Birth Cohort Study Linking Ethnographic and Epidemiological Methods. BMJ, 324, 942-945.
[14] Teixeira, C., Correia, S., Victora, C.G. and Barros, H. (2013) The Brazilian Preference: Cesarean Delivery among Immigrants in Portugal. PLoS ONE, 8, e60168.
[15] Potter, J.E., Hopkins, K., Faúndes, A.M.D. and Perpétuo, I. (2008) Women’s Autonomy and Scheduled Cesarean Sections in Brazil: A Cautionary Tale. Birth, 35, 33-40.
[16] Carvalho, L.E.C., Osis, M.J.D., Cecatti, J.G., Bento, S.F. and Manfrinati, M.B. (2007) Voluntary Surgical Sterilization in Greater Metropolitan Campinas, Sao Paulo State, Brazil, before and after Legal Regulation of the Procedure. Cadernos de Saúde Pública, 23, 2906-2916.
[17] MS. Brazilian System of Health Information. Ministry of Health. Accessed on 20 August 2015.
[18] MS. Brazilian System of Health Information. Ministry of Health. Accessed on 6 October 2015.
[19] Coutinho, L.M., Scazufca, M. and Menezes, P.R. (2008) Methods for Estimating Prevalence Ratios in Cross-Sectional Studies. Revista de Saúde Pública, 42, 992-998.
[20] Spiegelman, D., Hertzmark, E. and Wand, C. (2007) Point and Interval Estimates of Partial Population Attributable Risks in Cohort Studies: Examples and Software. Cancer Causes Control, 18, 571-579.
[21] Ministry of Health (Brazil). Live Birth Information Systems Brazil. Accessed on 18 March 2014.
[22] Silva, Z.P., Almeida, M.F., Ortiz, L.O., Alencar, G.P., Alencar, A., et al. (2010) Early Neonatal Mortality According to Level of Hospital Complexity in Greater Metropolitan Sao Paulo, Brazil. Cadernos de Saúde Pública, 26, 123-134.
[23] Salvador, J., Cano-Serral, G., Rodriguez-Sanz, M., Lladonosa, A. and Borrell, C. (2009) Inequalities in Caesarean Section: Influence of the Type of Maternity Care and Social Class in an Area with a National Health System. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 63, 259-261.
[24] Mossialos, E., Allin, S., Karras, K. and Davaki, K. (2005) An Investigation of Caesarean Sections in Three Greek Hospitals the Impact of Financial Incentives and Convenience. The European Journal of Public Health, 15, 288-295.
[25] Einarsdóttir, K., Haggar, F., Pereira, G., Leonard, H., de Klerk, N., Stanley, F.J. and Stock, S. (2013) Role of Public and Private Funding in the Rising Caesarean Section Rate: A Cohort Study. BMJ Open, 3, e002789.
[26] Menacker, F., Hamilton, B.E., Howell, S., Johnston, T. and Macleod, S.L. (2010) Recent Trends in Cesarean Delivery in the United States. NCHS Data Brief, No. 35, 1-8.
[27] Hotimsky, S.N., Rattner, D., Venancio, S.I., Bogus, C.M. and Miranda, M.M. (2002) Childbirth as I See It.... or the Way I Wish It Was? Expectations of Pregnant Women towards Childbirth and Obstetric Care in the Public Health Care System. Cadernos de Saúde Pública, 18, 1303-1311.
[28] Hopkins, K. (2000) Are Brazilian Women Really Choosing to Deliver by Cesarean? Social Science & Medicine, 51, 725-740.
[29] D’Orsi, E., Chor, D., Giffin, K., Angulo-Tuesta, A., Barbosa, G.P., Gama, A.S., et al. (2005) Factors Caesarean Associates and Quality of the Attention to the Childbirth in the City of Rio de Janeiro. Revista de Saúde Pública, 39, 646-654.
[30] Renfrew, M.J., McFadden, A., Bastos, M.H., Campbell, J., Channon, A.A., et al. (2014) Midwifery and Quality Care: Findings from a New Evidence Informed Framework for Maternal and Newborn Care. Lancet, 384, 1129-1145.
[31] Riesco, M.L.G. (2014) Birth in Brazil “in Time”: A Matter of Hierarchy in Birthcare Interventions? Cadernos de Saúde Pública, 30, S1-S31.
[32] Narchi, N.Z., Cruz, E.F. and Goncalves, R. (2013) The Role of Midwives and Nurse-Midwives in Promoting Safe Motherhood in Brazil. Ciência & Saúde Coletiva, 18, 1059-1068.
[33] Faúndes, A., Pádua, K.S., Osis, M.J., Cecatti, J.G. and Sousa, M.H. (2004) Brazilian Women and Physicians’ Viewpoints on Their Preferred Route of Delivery. Revista de Saúde Pública, 38, 488-494.

comments powered by Disqus

Copyright © 2020 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc.

Creative Commons License

This work and the related PDF file are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.