Socio-Economic Metabolism and Sustainability at a Watershed

Angela Terumi Fushita; José Eduardo dos Santos

doi:10.4236/ojapps.2015.511067

Home > Journals > Biomedical & Life Sciences | Chemistry & Materials Science > OJAppS

Open Journal of Applied Sciences > Vol.5 No.11, November 2015

Socio-Economic Metabolism and Sustainability at a Watershed ()

Angela Terumi Fushita, José Eduardo dos Santos

Department of Hydrobiology, Federal University of São Carlos, São Carlos, Brazil.

DOI: 10.4236/ojapps.2015.511067 PDF HTML XML 4,611 Downloads 5,011 Views Citations

Abstract

This research relates to the change in land use and land cover and to socio-economic metabolism, which constitute two approaches to interdisciplinary research on the society-nature relationship. The study focuses on relationships between the spatial pattern of land use, as exhibited through changes in Human Appropriation of Net Primary Productivity percentage (HANPP%), and socio- economic indicators (such as social exclusion/inclusion, income autonomy, human development, social equity and quality of life) of census sectors of a watershed. The analysis seeks to identify the existence of ecological and economic conflicts as a means of diagnosing the sustainability condition of the mid-upper Mogi Guaçu River watershed in 2009. The spatial pattern of land use of the watershed in 2009 indicates that ecosystems and natural habitats had already been reduced to a fraction of their original sizes and that a significant portion of their primary productivity had been appropriated. The predominance of anthropogenic agricultural activities in the watershed was the main cause of the increase in the HANPP%. Lower HANPP% values are associated with census sectors in regions with legally protected conservation areas; higher values are associated with census sectors involved in anthropogenic agricultural and non-agricultural activities. A positive significant correlation was observed between HANPP% and social exclusion/inclusion, income autonomy and human development indicators, with values above the Basic Social Inclusion Standard, indicating lower trophic availability. With the exception of the quality of life indicator, lower (0.75 to 0.25) and higher (-0.75 to -0.25) social exclusion values were observed in rural and urban census sectors. The environmental sustainability of the middle Mogi Guaçu River watershed has been compromised in terms of the amount of biomass available to the trophic community. However, socio-economic indicators demonstrate an improved quality of life for the populations of the census sectors of the middle Mogi Guaçu River watershed.

Keywords

HANPP, Sustainability Indicator, Socio-Economic Indicators, Land Use Change

Share and Cite:

Fushita, A. and dos Santos, J. (2015) Socio-Economic Metabolism and Sustainability at a Watershed. Open Journal of Applied Sciences, 5, 678-687. doi: 10.4236/ojapps.2015.511067.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

[1]	Perez-Soba, M., Petit, S., Jones, L., Bertrand, N., Briquel, V., Omodei-Zorini, L., et al. (2008) Land Use Functions—A Multifunctionality Approach to Assess the Impact of Land Use Changes on Land Use Sustainability. In: Helming, K., Perez-Soba, M. and Tabbush, P., Eds., Sustainability Impact Assessment of Land-Use Changes, Springer, Berlin, 375- 404. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-78648-1_19
[2]	Torres-Gómez, M., Delgado, L.E., Marín, V.H. and Bustamante, R.O. (2009) Landscape Structure along Gradients Urban-Rural in the River Basin Aisen (Aysen Region, Chile). Revista Chilena de Historia Natural, 82, 73-82.
[3]	Haberl, H., Wackernagel, M. and Wrbka, T. (2004) Land Use and Sustainability Indicators. An Introduction. Land Use Policy, 21, 193-198. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2003.10.004
[4]	Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (2003) Ecosystems and Human Well-Being: A Framework for Assessment. Island Press, Washington DC.
[5]	Haberl, H.M., Erb, K.H. and Krausmann, F. (2014) Human Appropriation of Net Primary Production: Patterns, Trends, and Planetary Boundaries. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 39, 363-391. http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev-environ-121912-094620
[6]	Porto, M.F. and Martinez-Alier, J. (2007) Political Ecology, Ecological Economics and Public Health: Interfaces for the Sustainability of Development and Health Promotion. Cadernos de Saúde Pública, 23, S503-S512.
[7]	Martinez-Alier, J., Kallis, G., Veuthey, S., Walter, M. and Temper, L. (2010) Social Metabolism, Ecological Distribution Conflicts, and Valuation Languages. Ecological Economics, 70, 153-158. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2010.09.024
[8]	Riebsame, W., Meyer, W.B. and Turner II, B.L. (1994) Modeling Land Use and Cover a Part of Global Environmental Change. Climatic Change, 28, 45-64. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF01094100
[9]	Krausmann, F., Haberl, H., Schulz, N., Erb, K.H., Darge, E. and Gaube, V. (2003) Land-Use Change and Socioeconomic Metabolism in Austria. Part I: Driving Forces of Land-Use Change 1950-1995. Land Use Policy, 20, 1-20. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0264-8377(02)00048-0
[10]	Haberl, H. (2006) The Global Socioeconomic Energetic Metabolism as a Sustainability Problem. Energy, 31, 87-99. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2004.04.045
[11]	Vitousek, P.M., Mooney, H.A., Lubchenco, J. and Mclillo, J.M. (1997) Human Domination of Earth’s Ecosystems. Science, 277, 494-499. http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.277.5325.494
[12]	Wrbka, T., Erb, K.H., Schulz, N.B., Peterseila, J., Hahna, C. and Haberl, H. (2004) Linking Pattern and Process in Cultural Landscapes. An Empirical Study Based on Spatially Explicit Indicators. Land Use Policy, 21, 289-306. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2003.10.012
[13]	Crosta, A.P. (1992) Remote Sensing Digital Image Processing. Campinas IG/UNICAMP, 173 p.
[14]	Moreira, M.A. (2011) Remote Sensing Fundamentals and Application Methods. 4th Edition, UFV, Brazil, 422 p.
[15]	Haber, W. (1994) Systems Ecological Concepts for Environmental Planning. In: Klijn, F., Ed., Ecosystem Classification for Environmental Management, Leiden University, Leiden, 49-67. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-1384-9_3
[16]	Field, C.B., Campbell, E. and Lobell, D.B. (2007) Biomass Energy: The Scale of the Potential Resource. Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 23, 65-72. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2007.12.001
[17]	Abson, D.J., Dougill, A.J. and Stringer, L. (2012) Using Principal Component Analysis for Information-Rich Socio- Ecological Vulnerability Mapping in Southern Africa. Applied Geography, 35, 515-524. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.apgeog.2012.08.004
[18]	Uchijima, Z. and Seino, H. (1985) Agroclimatic Evaluation of Net Primary Productivity of Natural Vegetations. Journal of Agricultural Meteorology, 40, 343-352. http://dx.doi.org/10.2480/agrmet.40.343
[19]	Nascimento, R.S., Brito, J.I.B. and Braga, C.C. (2009) Estimating Net Primary Production Using NDVI Data for the State of Paraiba. Anais do XIV Simpósio Brasileiro de Sensoriamento Remoto, Natal, 25-30 April 2009, 5321-5327.
[20]	IBGE (2010) Demographic Census. http://censo2010.ibge.gov.br/
[21]	O’Neill, D.W., Tyedmers, P.H. and Beazley, K.F. (2007) Human Appropriation of Net Primary Production (HANPP) in Nova Scotia, Canada. Regional Environmental Change, 7, 1-14. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10113-006-0021-1
[22]	Sposati, A. (1996) Social Exclusion/Inclusion Map of the City of São Paulo. EDUC, São Paulo.
[23]	Genovez, P.C., Monteiro, A.M. and Camara, G. (2007) Territorial Indicators of Inclusion/Exclusion: Geoinformation to Support the Planning of Social Policies. In: Almeida, C.M., Camara, G. and Monteiro, A.M., Eds., Geoinformation in Urbanism: Real City x Virtual City, Oficina de Textos, São Paulo, 209-229.
[24]	Nascimento, E. and Matias, L.F. (2008) Mapping Social Exclusion/Inclusion in Intra-Urban Space Based on Census Data: The Experience of Ponta Grossa, Paraná State, Brazil. TerraPlural, 2, 87-102. http://dx.doi.org/10.5212/TerraPlural.v.2i1.087102
[25]	R CORE TEAM (2013) R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. http://www.R-project.org/
[26]	Krausmann, F., Erb, K.H., Gingrich, S., Haberl, H., Bondeau, A., Gaube, V., et al. (2013) Global Human Appropriation of Net Primary Production Doubled in 20th Century. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 110, 10324-10329. http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1211349110
[27]	Imhoff, M.L., Bounoua, L., Ricketts, T., Loucks, C., Harriss, R. and Lawrence, W.T. (2004) Global Patterns in Human Consumption of Net Primary Production. Nature, 429, 870-873. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature02619
[28]	Rojstaczer, S., Sterling, S.M. and Moore, N.J. (2001) Human Appropriation of Photosynthesis Products. Science, 294, 2549-2552. http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.1064375
[29]	Haberl, H., Gaube, V., Diaz-Delgado, R., Krauze, K., Neuner, A., Perterseil, J., et al. (2009) Towards an Integrated Model of Socioeconomic Biodiversity Drivers, Pressures and Impacts. A Feasibility Study Based on Three European Long Term Socio-Ecological Research Platforms. Ecological Economics, 68, 1797-1812. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2008.11.013
[30]	Sposati, A. (2002) Social Exclusion/Inclusion Map. ComCiência.