Impacts of Cruise-Ship Entry Quotas on Visibility and Air Quality in Glacier Bay


Managers at Glacier Bay National Park must annually determine the allowable number of cruise-ship entries into the park. This decision considers how differences in visitor volume may affect park resources. This study quantified the impacts to air quality and visibility under different ship quotas using simulations with the Weather Research and Forecasting model inline coupled with chemistry. Results of the simulation assuming two entries per day for May 15 to September 15, 2008 (QTA; 248 ship entries representing a 35% increase) were compared to those of the 2008 cruise-ship activity (REF; 184) during that timeframe. A simulation without anthropogenic emissions (CLN) served to assess the overall impacts of cruise-ship emissions on visibility and air quality in Glacier Bay. Compared to REF, the increased entry quotas shifted chemical regimes and aerosol composition, depending upon thermodynamical conditions, and ambient concentrations. On days with notable regime shifts, sulfur-dioxide concentrations deceased while ammonium-sulfate aerosol concentrations increased. The increased quotas also altered the fine-to-coarse aerosol ratios in both directions despite constant ratio of fine-to-coarse aerosol emissions. In Glacier Bay, the days with worst visibility coincided with high relative humidity, although this relationship varied by scenario. On the 20% worst days, mean visibility was slightly better in CLN (mean haze index over Glacier Bay waters = 2.9 dv) than in REF ( = 3.1 dv). While increased emissions in QTA reduced mean visibility by 0.1 dv, the 10th, 50th and 90th percentile of haze indices remained identical to those in REF. Best (worst) visibility occurred on the same days in REF and QTA due to emission impacts, but on different days than in CLN because relative humidity solely governed visibility in CLN. While calm wind played no role for visibility in CLN, wind speed gained similar importance for visibility as relative humidity in REF and QTA. Overall, increasing ship quotas would only marginally affect air quality and visibility as compared to REF, although even small changes in these parameters need careful consideration in the context of conserving the values of Glacier Bay.

Share and Cite:

Mölders, N. and Gende, S. (2015) Impacts of Cruise-Ship Entry Quotas on Visibility and Air Quality in Glacier Bay. Journal of Environmental Protection, 6, 1236-1256. doi: 10.4236/jep.2015.611109.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.


[1] Eijgelaar, E., Thaper, C. and Peeters, P. (2010) Antarctic Cruise Tourism: The Paradoxes of Ambassadorship, “Last Chance Tourism” and Greenhouse Gas Emissions. Journal of Sustainable Tourism, 18, 337-354.
[2] National Park Service (2006) Management Policies 2006. Management of National Park Service Programs, Washington DC.
[3] Eyring, V., Köhler, H.W., van Aardenne, J. and Lauer, A. (2005) Emissions from International Shipping: 1. The Last 50 Years. Journal of Geophysical Research, 110, Article ID: D17305.
[4] Corbett, J.J., Lack, D.A., Winebrake, J.J., et al. (2010) Arctic Shipping Emissions Inventories and Future Scenarios. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, 10, 9689-9704.
[5] Capaldo, K., Corbett, J.J., Kasibhatla, P., Fischbeck, P. and Pandis, S.N. (1999) Effects of Ship Emissions on Sulphur Cycling and Radiative Climate Forcing over the Ocean. Nature, 400, 743-746.
[6] Derwent, R.G., Stevenson, D.S., Doherty, R.M., et al. (2009) The Contribution from Shipping Emissions to Air Quality and Acid Deposition in Europe. AMBIO: A Journal of the Human Environment, 34, 54-59.
[7] Dalsøren, S.B., Eide, M.S., Myhre, G., et al. (2010) Impacts of the Large Increase in International Ship Traffic 2000-2007 on Tropospheric Ozone and Methane. Environmental Science and Technology, 44, 2482-2489.
[8] Hindley, A. and Font, X. (2014) Ethics and Influences in Tourist Perceptions of Climate Change. Current Issues in Tourism, 1-17.
[9] Law, K.S. and Stohl, A. (2007) Arctic Air Pollution: Origins and Impacts. Science, 315, 1537-1540.
[10] Liu, X., Gu, J., Li, Y., et al. (2013) Increase of Aerosol Scattering by Hygroscopic Growth: Observation, Modeling, and Implications on Atmospheric Visibility. Atmospheric Research, 132-133, 91-101.
[11] Pirhalla, M.A., Gende, S. and Mölders, N. (2014) Fate of Particulate Matter from Cruise-Ship Emissions in Glacier Bay during the 2008 Tourist Season. Journal of Environmental Protection, 4, 1235-1254.
[12] Mölders, N., Gende, S. and Pirhalla, M.A. (2013) Assessment of Cruise Ship Activity Influences on Emissions, Air Quality, and Visibility in Glacier Bay National Park. Atmospheric Pollution Research, 4, 435-445.
[13] Platnick, S. and Twomey, S. (1994) Determining the Susceptibility of Cloud Albedo to Changes in Droplet Concentration with the Advanced Very High Resolution Radiometer. Journal of Applied Meteorology, 33, 334-347.<0334:DTSOCA>2.0.CO;2
[14] Seinfeld, J.H. and Pandis, S.N. (1997) Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, from Air Pollution to Climate Change. John Wiley & Sons, New York, 1326 p.
[15] Menut, L., Tripathi, O., Colette, A., et al. (2013) Evaluation of Regional Climate Simulations for Air Quality Modelling Purposes. Climate Dynamics, 40, 2515-2533.
[16] Shulski, M. and Wendler, G. (2007) The Climate of Alaska. University of Alaska Press, Fairbanks, 216 p.
[17] National Park Service (2009) Glacier Bay National Park and Preserve Foundation Statement.
[18] Skamarock, W.C., Klemp, J.B., Dudhia, J., et al. (2008) A Description of the Advanced Research WRF Version 3. NCAR/TN, 125 p.
[19] Peckham, S.E., Fast, J., Schmitz, R., et al. (2011) WRF/Chem Version 3.3 User’s Guide. 96 p.
[20] Mölders, N., Bruyère, C.L., Gende, S. and Pirhalla, M.A. (2014) Assessment of the 2006-2012 Climatological Fields and Mesoscale Features from Regional Downscaling of CESM Data by WRF-Chem over Southeast Alaska. Atmospheric and Climate Sciences, 4, 589-613.
[21] Grell, G.A. and Dévényi, D. (2002) A Generalized Approach to Parameterizing Convection. Geophysical Research Letters, 29, 38-1-38-4.
[22] Hong, S.-Y. and Lim, J.O.J. (2006) The WRF Single-Moment 6-Class Microphysics Scheme (WSM6). Journal of Korean Meteorological Society, 42, 129-151.
[23] Chou, M.-D. and Suarez, M.J. (1994) An Efficient Thermal Infrared Radiation Parameterization for Use in General Circulation Models. NASA Technical Memorandum 104606, Technical Report Series on Global Modeling and Data Assimilation, Volume 3, National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Greenbelt, 85 p.
[24] Mlawer, E.J., Taubman, S.J., Brown, P.D., Iacono, M.J. and Clough, S.A. (1997) Radiative Transfer for Inhomogeneous Atmospheres: RRTM, a Validated Correlated-K Model for the Long Wave. Journal of Geophysical Research, 102D, 16663-16682.
[25] Barnard, J., Fast, J., Paredes-Miranda, G., Arnott, W. and Laskin, A. (2010) Technical Note: Evaluation of the WRF-Chem “Aerosol Chemical to Aerosol Optical Properties” Module Using Data from the MILAGRO Campaign. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, 10, 7325-7340.
[26] Janjic, Z.I. (2002) Nonsingular Implementation of the Mellor-Yamada Level 2.5 Scheme in the NCEP Meso Model. NCEP Office Note, 61 p.
[27] Chen, F. and Dudhia, J. (2000) Coupling an Advanced Land-Surface/Hydrology Model with the Penn State/NCAR MM5 Modeling System. Part I: Model Description and Implementation. Monthly Weather Review, 129, 569-585.<0569:CAALSH>2.0.CO;2
[28] Stockwell, W.R., Middleton, P., Chang, J.S. and Tang, X. (1990) The Second-Generation Regional Acid Deposition Model Chemical Mechanism for Regional Air Quality Modeling. Journal of Geophysical Research, 95, 16343-16367.
[29] Madronich, S. (1987) Photodissociation in the Atmosphere, 1, Actinic Flux and the Effects of Ground Reflections and Clouds. Journal of Geophysical Research, 92, 9740-9752.
[30] Wesely, M.L. (1989) Parameterization of Surface Resistances to Gaseous Dry Deposition in Regional-Scale Numerical Models. Atmospheric Environment, 23, 1293-1304.
[31] Mölders, N., Tran, H.N.Q., Quinn, P., et al. (2011) Assessment of WRF/Chem to Capture Sub-Arctic Boundary Layer Characteristics during Low Solar Irradiation Using Radiosonde, Sodar, and Station Data. Atmospheric Pollution Research, 2, 283-299.
[32] Ackermann, I.J., Hass, H., Memmesheimer, M., et al. (1998) Modal Aerosol Dynamics Model for Europe: Development and First Applications. Atmospheric Environment, 32, 2981-2299.
[33] Schell, B., Ackermann, I.J., Hass, H., Binkowski, F.S. and Ebel, A. (2001) Modeling the Formation of Secondary Organic Aerosol within a Comprehensive Air Quality Model System. Journal of Geophysical Research, 106, 28275-28293.
[34] Simpson, D., Guenther, A., Hewitt, C.N. and Steinbrecher, R. (1995) Biogenic Emissions in Europe 1. Estimates and Uncertainties. Journal of Geophysical Research, 100D, 22875-22890.
[35] Guenther, A. (1997) Seasonal and Spatial Variations in Natural Volatile Organic Compound Emissions. Ecological Applications, 7, 34-45.[0034:SASVIN]2.0.CO;2
[36] Petzold, A., Feldpausch, P., Fritzsche, L., et al. (2004) Particle Emissions from Ship Engines. Journal of Aerosol Science, 35, S1095-S1096.
[37] Mölders, N., Porter, S.E., Cahill, C.F. and Grell, G.A. (2010) Influence of Ship Emissions on Air Quality and Input of Contaminants in Southern Alaska National Parks and Wilderness Areas during the 2006 Tourist Season. Atmospheric Environment, 44, 1400-1413.
[38] Department of Commerce (2000) NCEP FNL Operational Model Global Tropospheric Analyses, Continuing from July 1999. Research Data Archive at the National Center for Atmospheric Research, Computational and Information Systems Laboratory.
[39] Sisler, J.F. and Malm, W.C. (2000) Interpretation of Trends of PM2.5 and Reconstructed Visibility from the IMPROVE Network. Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association, 50, 775-789.
[40] Cotton, W.R. and Pielke, R.A. (2007) Human Impacts on Weather and Climate. 2nd Edition, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
[41] Zhang, Y., Wen, X.Y. and Jang, C.J. (2010) Simulating Chemistry-Aerosol-Cloud-Radiation-Climate Feedbacks over the Continental US Using the Online-Coupled Weather Research Forecasting Model with Chemistry (WRF/Chem). Atmospheric Environment, 44, 3568-3582.
[42] Grell, G.A., Freitas, S.R., Stuefer, M. and Fast, J.D. (2011) Inclusion of Biomass Burning in WRF-Chem: Impact on Wildfires on Weather Forecasts. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, 11, 5289-5303.
[43] Zhang, B., Wang, Y. and Hao, J. (2015) Simulating Aerosol-Radiation-Cloud Feedbacks on Meteorology and Air Quality over Eastern China under Severe Haze Conditions in Winter. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, 15, 2387-2404.
[44] Webb, K. and Gende, S.M. (2015) Activity Patterns and Speeds of Large Cruise Ships in Southeast Alaska. Coastal Management, 43, 67-83.
[45] ENVIRON (2002) Commercial Marine Emission Inventory Development. Final Report, 163 p.
[46] Kramm, G., Dlugi, R., Dollard, G.J., et al. (1995) On the Dry Deposition of Ozone and Reactive Nitrogen Compounds. Atmospheric Environment, 29, 3209-3231.
[47] Dennis, R.L., Bhave, P.V. and Pinder, R.W. (2008) Observable Indicators of the Sensitivity of PM2.5 Nitrate to Emission Reductions—Part II: Sensitivity to Errors in Total Ammonia and Total Nitrate of the CMAQ-Predicted Non-Linear Effect of SO2 Emission Reductions. Atmospheric Environment, 42, 1287-1300.
[48] Leelasakultum, K., Mölders, N., Tran, H.N.Q. and Grell, G.A. (2012) Potential Impacts of the Introduction of Low Sulfur Fuel on PM2.5-Concentrations at Breathing Level in a Subarctic City. Advances in Meteorology, 2012, 1-17.
[49] Environmental Protection Agency (2007) Guidance on the Use of Models and Other Analyses for Demonstrating Attainment of Air Quality Goals for Ozone, PM2.5, and Regional Haze. EPA, Research Triangle Park, 262 p.

Copyright © 2022 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc.

Creative Commons License

This work and the related PDF file are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.