Gender Differences in Formal Thinking: Their Impact on Right-Wing Authoritarianism and Religious Fundamentalism

K. Robert Bridges^*, Richard J. Harnish

Department of Psychology, The Pennsylvania State University, New Kensington Campus, New Kensington, PA, USA.

DOI: 10.4236/psych.2015.613164                

Abstract

The present study investigated the relationship between cognitive development and political and religious ideology, and whether there are gender differences in formal thinking which may be related to right-wing authoritarianism and religious fundamentalism. The conceptual and empirical literature suggests that many aspects of cognition which play a role in the formation of conservative political and religious ideology are also present in those who engage in Piagetian concrete thinking (versus formal thought). The sample consisted of 116 late adolescents and young adults enrolled at a large public university. Results found that only 40% of participants had achieved formal thought on a traditional test of formal thinking, and that women who had lower scores on this test scored higher on measures of right-wing authoritarianism and religious fundamentalism. There was no such relationship for men. The present study shows the value of this approach and suggests the need for a pragmatic test of formal thought focused on political and religious ideologies.

Keywords

Formal Reasoning, Right-Wing Authoritarianism, Religiosity

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

[1]	Adorno, T. W., Frankel-Brunswik, E., Levinson, D. J., & Sanford, R.W. (1950). The Authoritarian Personality. New York, NY: Harper.
[2]	Altemeyer, R. A. (1998). The Other “Authoritarian Personality.” In M. P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in Experimental Social Psychology (pp. 47-91). San Diego: Academic Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s0065-2601(08)60382-2
[3]	Altemeyer, R. A. (2006). The Authoritarians. http://members.shaw.ca/jeanaltemeyer/drbob/TheAuthoritarians.pdf
[4]	Altemeyer, R. A., & Hunsberger, B. (1992). Authoritarianism, Religious Fundamentalism, Quest, and Prejudice. International Journal for the Psychology of Religion, 2, 113-133. http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/s15327582ijpr0202_5
[5]	Altemeyer, R. A., & Hunsberger, B. (2004). A Revised Religious Fundamentalism Scale: The Short and Sweet of It. International Journal for the Psychology of Religion, 14, 47-54. http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/s15327582ijpr1401_4
[6]	Arlin, P. K. (1984). Arlin Test of Formal Reasoning: Test Manual. East Auroa, NY: Slosson Educational.
[7]	Bobo, L., & Licari, F. C. (1989). Education and Political Tolerance: Testing the Effects of Cognitive Sophistication and Target Group Affect. Public Opinion Quarterly, 53, 285-308. http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/269154
[8]	Bradmetz, J. (1999). Precursors of Formal Thought: A Longitudinal Study. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 17, 61-81. http://dx.doi.org/10.1348/026151099165159
[9]	Brandt, M. J., & Reyna, C. (2010). The Role of Prejudice and the Need for Closure in Religious Fundamentalism. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 36, 715-725. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0146167210366306
[10]	Chirumbolo, A. (2002). The Relationship between Need for Cognitive Closure and Political Orientation: The Mediating Role of Authoritarianism. Personality and Individual Differences, 32, 603-610. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0191-8869(01)00062-9
[11]	Cole, M., Cole, S. R., & Lightfoot, C. (2005). The Development of Children. New York: Worth.
[12]	Crowson, H. M., DeBacker, T. K., & Thoma, S. J. (2005). Does Authoritarianism Predict Post-9/11 Attitudes? Personality and Individual Differences, 39, 1273-1283. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2005.06.005
[13]	Durrheim, K. (1997). Cognition and Ideology: A Rhetorical Approach to Critical Theory. Theory and Psychology, 7, 749-770. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0959354397076002
[14]	Ekehammar, B., Akrami, N., Gylje, M., & Zakrisson, I. (2004). What Matters Most to Prejudice: Big Five Personality, Social Dominance Orientation, or Right-Wing Authoritarianism? European Journal of Personality, 18, 463-482. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/per.526
[15]	Emler, N., Renwick, S., & Malone, B. (1983). The Relationship between Moral Reasoning and Political Orientation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45, 1073-1080. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.45.5.1073
[16]	Heaven, P. C. L., Ciarrochi, J., & Leeson, P. (2011). Cognitive Ability, Right-Wing Authoritarianism, and Social Dominance Orientation: A Five-Year Longitudinal Study amongst Adolescents. Intelligence, 39, 15-21. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.intell.2010.12.001
[17]	Hodson, G., & Busseri, M. A. (2012). Bright Minds and Dark Attitudes: Lower Cognitive Ability Predicts Greater Prejudice through Right-Wing Ideology and Low Intergroup Contact. Psychological Science, 23, 187-195. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0956797611421206
[18]	Hofstede, G. (1991). Cultures and Organizations: Software of the Mind. Maidenhead: McGraw-Hill.
[19]	Inhelder, B., & Piaget, J. (1958). The Growth of Logical Thinking from Childhood to Adolescence. New York: Basic Books. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/10034-000
[20]	Jackson, L. A., & Jeffers, D. (1989). The Attitudes about Reality Scale: A New Measure of Personal Epistemology. Journal of Personality Assessment, 53, 353-365. http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/s15327752jpa5302_12
[21]	Jost, J. T., Federico, C. M., & Napier, J. L. (2009). Political Ideology: Its Structure, Functions, and Elective Affinities. Annual Review of Psychology, 60, 307-337. http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.60.110707.163600
[22]	Jost, J. T., Glaser, J., Kruglanski, A. W., & Sulloway, F. J. (2003). Political Conservatism as Motivated Social Cognition. Psychological Bulletin, 129, 339-375. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.129.3.339
[23]	Kail, R. V. (2012). The Development of Memory in Children (3rd ed.). New York: W. H. Freeman.
[24]	Kemmelmeirer, M. (2008). Is There a Relationship between Political Orientation and Cognitive Ability? A Test of Three Hypotheses in Two Studies. Personality and Individual Differences, 45, 767-772. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2008.08.003
[25]	Kohlberg, L. (1969). Stage and Sequence: The Cognitive Developmental Approach to Socialization. In D. Goslin, (Ed.), Handbook of Socialization Theory and Research (pp. 347-480). Chicago, IL: Rand McNally.
[26]	Krebs, D. L., & Denton, K. (2005). Toward a More Pragmatic Approach to Morality: A Critical Evaluation of Kohlberg’s Model. Psychological Review, 112, 629-649. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.112.3.629
[27]	McCourt, K., Bouchard Jr., T., Lykken, D., Tellegren, A., & Keyes, M. (1999). Authoritarianism Revised: Genetic and Environmental Influence Examined in Twins Reared Apart and Together. Personality and Individual Differences, 27, 985-1014. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0191-8869(99)00048-3
[28]	Meehan, A. M. (1984). A Meta-Analysis of Sex Differences in Formal Operational Thought. Child Development, 55, 1110-1124. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1130164
[29]	Miller, P. H. (2010). Piaget’s Theory: Past, Present, and Future. In U. Goswami, (Ed.), The Wiley-Blackwell Handbook of Childhood Cognitive Development (pp. 649-672). Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/9781444325485.ch25
[30]	Mundy, A. (2004). Divided We Stand. Advertising Age. http://adage.com/article/american-demographics/divided-stand/44999/
[31]	Newman, B. M., & Newman, P. R. (2007). Theories of Human Development. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
[32]	Prezza Technologies, Inc. (2010). CheckBox (Version 4.7) [Computer Software]. Cambridge, MA.
[33]	Reyes, D. J. (1987). Cognitive Development of Teacher Candidates: An Analysis. Journal of Teacher Education, 38, 18-21. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/002248718703800205
[34]	Reykowski, J., & de Zavala, A. G. (2006). Consequences of Patriotism: Is Ethnocentrism Inevitable? In A. G. de Zavala, & K. Skarzynska, (Eds.), Understanding Social Change: Political Psychology in Poland (pp. 87-103). New York: Nova Science Publishers.
[35]	Schirks, A. (1970). Evaluation des opérationsintellectuellesd’adultesen formation. Unpublished Thesis, Nancy: University of Nancy.
[36]	Schoon, I., Cheng, H., Gale, C. R., Batty, G. D., & Deary, I. J. (2010). Social Status, Cognitive Ability, and Educational Attainment as Predictors of Liberal Social Attitudes and Political Trust. Intelligence, 38, 144-150. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.intell.2009.09.005
[37]	Seyle, D. C., & Newman, M. L. (2006). A House Divided? The Psychology of Red and Blue America. American Psychologist, 61, 571-580. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.61.6.571
[38]	Sidanius, J., Pratto, F., & Bobo, L. (1996). Racism, Conservatism, Affirmative Action, and Intellectual Sophistication: A Matter of Principled Conservatism or Group Dominance? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 476-490. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.70.3.476
[39]	Stankov, L. (2009). Conservatism and Cognitive Ability. Intelligence, 37, 294-304. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.intell.2008.12.007
[40]	Tetlock, P. E. (1983). Cognitive Style and Political Ideology. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45, 118-126. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.45.1.118
[41]	Thorisdottir, H., Jost, J. T., Liviatan, I., & Shrout, P. E. (2007). Psychological Needs and Values Underlying Left-Right Political Orientation: Cross-National Evidence from Eastern and Western Europe. Public Opinion Quarterly, 71, 175-203. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/poq/nfm008
[42]	Umbach, P. D., & Wawrzynski, M. R. (2005). Faculty Do Matter: The Role of College Faculty in Student Learning and Engagement. Research in Higher Education, 46, 153-184. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11162-004-1598-1
[43]	Unger, R. K., Draper, R. D., & Pendergrass, M. L. (1986). Personal Epistemology and Personal Experience. Journal of Social Issues, 42, 67-79. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4560.1986.tb00225.x