Interdisciplinary Practices along with the Basic Literacy Process: The Continuing Education Focused on Teachers

DOI: 10.4236/ce.2015.617185   PDF   HTML   XML   4,793 Downloads   5,161 Views   Citations


This collaborative research aimed to assist the process of continuing education for educators, suggesting the permanent meeting of formation groups in service, with discussions on child development, language (oral and written) and its relation to basic literacy and the use of tools/resources to support these processes. Six teachers with higher degree and average age of 32 years old participated in this study. All six participants had experiences in basic literacy (varying from four to nine years). Their students that also participated in the study were from second and third grades, with an average of 22 students per classroom. The data collection were carried out through the Metatextual Intervention Program PRONARRAR (Oliveira & Braga, 2012) and through conducting workshops with teachers from dialogic activities aimed to verify the knowledge of these teachers on the acquisition and difficulties of language (oral and written), the link between language acquisition and basic literacy and the possibilities of support and resources in these processes in the school environment. After the research, the topics were discussed and thereafter proposed the use of PRONARRAR in classroom with, forming groups, in which the scribe should be alternated as the sessions were advanced. After 12 sessions, the analysis of the student productions displayed improvement, especially from the rise of parts of stories and their characteristics, indicating the understanding of these pupils about the constituent elements of the narrative. The macrolinguistic aspects also progressed, since the students wrote a paragraph for each part of the story. The intervention program was set as an alternative to the pedagogical practices geared to delay situations in the basic literacy process. It can also be considered as an alternative to an interdisciplinary work to support this process in the school environment.

Share and Cite:

de Oliveira, J. and Zaboroski, A. (2015) Interdisciplinary Practices along with the Basic Literacy Process: The Continuing Education Focused on Teachers. Creative Education, 6, 1815-1824. doi: 10.4236/ce.2015.617185.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.


[1] Barrera, S. D., & Maluf, M. R. (2003). Metalinguistic Awareness and Literacy: A Study with Children of the First Grade of Elementary School. Psychology: Re-flexion and Criticism, 16, 491-502.
[2] Brazil. Ministry of Education and Culture (MEC) (2006). General Guidelines, Catalog 2006. National Network of Continuing Education for Basic Education Teachers.
[3] Capovilla, A. G. S., Capovilla, F. C., & Suiter, I. (2004). Cognitive Processing in Children with and without Reading Difficulties. Studying Psychology, 9, 449-458.
[4] Capovilla, A. G. S., Capovilla, F. C., Trevisan, B. T., & Rezende, M. C. (2006). Nature of Reading Difficulties among Brazilian Children with Developmental Dyslexia. Welcoming Literacy in Portuguese-Speaking Countries, 1, 6-18.
[5] Costa, A. S. F., & Rocha, V. A. M. (2006). The Importance of Initial and Continuing Training for professional Practice of Education/Physical Education.
[6] Cunha, V. L. O., & Capellini, S. A. (2009). Performance of Students from 1st to 4th Grade of Elementary School in Tests of Metalinguistic Skills and Reading—PROHMELE. Brazilian Society of Speech’s Magazine, 14.
[7] Ferreira, A. L., & Spinillo, A. G. (2003). Developing Texts Production Ability in Children from the Metatextual Awareness. In M. R. Maluf (Org.), Metalanguage and Acquisition of Writing (pp.119-148). São Paulo: Psychologists House.
[8] Fontana, R. A. C. (2000). How Do We Become Teachers? Belo Horizonte: Autêntica.
[9] Gombert, J. E. (2013). Epi/Meta versus Implicit/Explicit: Level of Cognitive Control over Reading and Its Learning. In M. R. Maluf, & C. Cardoso-Martins, (Orgs.), Literacy in the Twenty-First Century—How to Learn to Read and Write (pp. 109- 123). Porto Alegre: Penso Publisher.
[10] Maluf, M. R., & Cardoso-Martins, C. (Orgs.). (2013). Literacy in the Twenty-First Century—How to Learn to Read and Write. Porto Alegre: Penso Publisher.
[11] Marcuschi, L. A. (2010). Genres: Definition and Functionality. In A. P. Dionísio, A. R. Machado, & M. A. Bezerra (Orgs.), Genre and Education (2nd ed.). São Paulo: Editorial Parábola.
[12] Martins, M. S., Oliveira, J. P., & Carnevalle, L. B. (2013). The Political Pedagogical Project as a Tool for Inclusion and Its Relationship with the School Speech. In A. P. Zaboroski, & J. P. Oliveira (Orgs.), The Performance of Speech Therapy at School: Reflections and Practices (pp. 43-66). Rio de Janeiro: WAK Publisher.
[13] Mira, C. (2014). Reading and Text Production in Higher Education: A Matter of Genre or Discursive Genre? Entremeios Magazine, 19, 1-14.
[14] Morrow, L. M. (1986). Effects of Structural Guidance in Story Retelling on Children’s Dictation of Original Stories. Journal of Reading Behavior, 18, 135-152.
[15] Oliveira, J. P. (2010). Effects of a Metatextual Intervention Program for Students with Learning Difficulties. PhD Thesis, Marília: Paulista State University.
[16] Oliveira, J. P., & Braga, T. M. S. (2009). Effects of an Intervention Program Based on Support Pictographic and Metatextual Awareness. Annals of 9th EDUCERE and 3rd ESBP (pp. 6574-6586). Curitiba, PR: PUC’s Publishing House.
[17] Oliveira, J. P., & Braga, T. M. S. (2012). PRONARRAR—Metatextual Intervention Program—Support for Students in Arrears in the Literacy Process. Curitiba, PR: CRV Publishing House.
[18] Oliveira, J. P., Bonki, E., Braga, T. M. S., & Schier, A. C. (2012). Production of Knowledge about Oral Narratives: Contributions to Research in Child Language. CEFAC Magazine, 15, 1-22.
[19] Oliveira, J. P., Braga, T. M. S., Viana, F. L. P., & Santos, A. S. (2014). Literacy in Portuguese-Speaking Countries: Research and Intervention. Curitiba: CRV Publishing House.
[20] Rojo, R. H. R. (1989). The Development of Narrative in Writing: “Making Bread” and “Fitting”. PhD Thesis, Sao Paulo: Pontifical Catholic University of Sao Paulo.
[21] Santos, M. T. M. (2007). Vocabulary, Phonological Awareness and Rapid Naming: Contributions for Spelling and Writing Development. PhD Thesis, Sao Paulo: São Paulo University.
[22] Schneuwly, B., & Dolz, J. (2004). Oral and Written Genres at School. Translated by Roxane Rojo and Glaís Sales Cordeiro. Campinas: Mercado de Letras.
[23] Silva, M. E. L., & Spinillo, A. G. (2000). The Influence of Different Situations on Written Stories. Psychology: Reflection and Criticism, 13, 337-350.
[24] Soares, M. (2004). Literacy and Education: The Many Facets. Brazilian Magazine of Education, 59, 5-17.
[25] Thiollent, M. (1994). Methodology of Research-Action. São Paulo: Cortez.
[26] Vergara, S. C. (2005). Research Methods in Management. São Paulo: Atlas.
[27] Viana, F. L. P. (2005). Assessment and Intervention in Reading Learning Difficulties. In M. C. Taveira (Ed.), Educational Psychology: A Scientific-Pedagogical Proposal. Coimbra: Quarteto.
[28] Zorzi, J. L. (2003). Learning and Written Language Disorders: Clinical and Educational Issues. Porto Alegre: Artmed.

comments powered by Disqus

Copyright © 2020 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc.

Creative Commons License

This work and the related PDF file are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.