Assessment of Hearing Status by Pure Tone Audiogram—An Institutional Study

Abstract

Aim: To assess the hearing status of the study subjects in terms of degree and type of hearing loss, and establish the burden of this disability in the society. Materials and methods: This is a prospective study conducted in patients who attend our OPD. After an otorhinolaryngeal examination, all the patients were subjected to pure tone audiometry using MAICA-MA52 audiometer. Results: Our study comprises 1012 males (64%) and 563 females (36%). Out of this, about 15% have conductive deafness and 42% have sensorineural hearing loss. About 29% suffer from mild hearing loss, 26% moderate and 11% severe hearing loss. The alarming information is that about 5% have total hearing loss of Sudden Sensorineural type (SSNHL). Conclusion: Pure tone audiometry is cost effective and easy to perform. Early diagnosis and timely intervention will reduce the morbidity of deafness in our country. Hence it is necessary to identify and treat sudden sensorineural hearing loss and noise induced hearing loss at an early stage.

Share and Cite:

Balasubramanian, G. , Thirunavukkarasu, R. , Kalyanasundaram, R. and Narendran, G. (2015) Assessment of Hearing Status by Pure Tone Audiogram—An Institutional Study. International Journal of Otolaryngology and Head & Neck Surgery, 4, 375-380. doi: 10.4236/ijohns.2015.45062.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

[1] Taneja, M.K. (2014) Deafness a Social Stigma: Physician Perspective. Indian Journal of Otolaryngology and Head & Neck Surgery, 66, 353-358.
[2] Health Info Statistics and Epidemiology. Quick Statistics, National Institute on Deafness and other Communication Disorders (NIDCD).
http://www.nidcd.nih.gov/health/statistics/pages/quick.aspx
[3] Ramya, C.S., Karthiyanee, K. and Vinutha, S. (2011) Effect of Mobile Phone Usage on Hearing Threshold: A Pilot Study. Indian Journal of Otology, 17, 159-161.
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0971-7749.94494
[4] National Programme for Prevention and Control of Deafness (NPPCD) Operational Guideline.
http://mohfw.nic.in
[5] Tucker, S.M. (1995) Triagem e tratamento da surdez na pratica clinica. Anais Nestle, 50, 18-24.
[6] Nogueria, J.C.R. and da Conceicao Mendonca, M. (2011) Assessment of Hearing in a Municipal Public School Student Population. Brazilian Journal of Otorhinolaryngology, 77 (6).
[7] Lin, F.R., Metter, E.J., O’Brien, J.R., Resnick, S.M., Zonderman, A.B. and Ferrucci, L. (2011) Hearing Loss and Incidence of Dementia. Archives of Neurology, 68, 214-220.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/archneurol.2010.362
[8] (2003) Prevention and Control of Deafness and Hearing Impairment Report on Intercountry Consultation, Colombo, Sri Lanka. World Health Organisation, Regional Office of South East Asia Report.
[9] Arts, H., Garber, A. and Zwolen, A. (2002) Cochlear Implants in Young Children. Otolaryngologic Clinics of North America, 35, 925-942. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0030-6665(02)00059-2
[10] Vignesh, S.S., Jaya, V. and Muraleedharan, A. (2014) Prevalence and Audiological Characteristics of Auditory Neuropathy Spectrum Disorder in Paediatric Population: A Retrospective Study. Indian Journal of Otolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, 66 (3).
[11] Rabinowitz, P.M. (2000) Noise-Induced Hearing Loss Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut. American Family Physician, 61, 2749-2756.

Copyright © 2023 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc.

Creative Commons License

This work and the related PDF file are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.