Effect of Mechanical and Chemical Scarification on Germination of Dodder (Cuscuta campestris Yunck.) Seed

A. B. Mustapha¹, N. A. Gworgwor², B. B. Jakusko¹

¹Department of Crop Production and Horticulture, Modibbo Adama University of Technology, Yola, Nigeria.
²Department Crop Science, University of Maiduguri, Maiduguri, Nigeria.

DOI: 10.4236/wjet.2015.33B006                

Abstract

Experiments were carried out to evaluate the effect of seed treatment on germination of Cuscuta campestris. This may provide the possible ways to overcome the problem of dormancy in Cuscuta campestris. The experiments were conducted in the Laboratory of Crop Production and Horticulture, Modibbo Adama University of Technology, Yola, Adamawa State, Nigeria, using mechanical scarification and tetraoxosulphate (VI) acid (H2SO4). For the mechanical scarification the treatments were unscarified, scarified using sandpaper and scarified using gravel arranged in a completely randomized design (CRD) and replicated four times. For the tetraoxosulphate (VI) acid (H2SO4) scarification, the treatment of control, 9:1, 7:3, 1:1, 4:6, 3:7, 2:8 and 1:9 H2SO4 were laid out in a Split plot design and replicated three times. The mechanical scarification was not significant (P ≤ 0.05), a rapid increase of germination from day 3 to day 9 was observed, and the highest rate of germination percentage (14% - 22%) obtained on day 9. Tetraoxosulphate (VI) acid treatment of 4:6 concentrations significantly gave the highest C. campestris seeds germination percentage (40.07%) compared with the rest of the treatments, while the time of soaking the seeds in the tetraoxosulphate (VI) acid showed that soaking the seeds for 1 minute significantly gave the highest percentage germination (39.98%) of C. campestris compared with the 3 and 5 minutes soaking treatments. It can be concluded that sulphuric acid of 4:6 concentrations treatments has the potentiality to break dormancy of C. campestris seeds.

Keywords

Dormancy, Scarification, Germination, Cuscuta campestris

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

[1]	Holm, L., Doll, J., Holm, E., Panch, J. and Herberger, J. (1979) World Weeds: Natural Historiesand Distribution. John Wiley & Sons, New York, 1129 p.
[2]	Gworgwor, N.A., Ndahi, W.B. and Chr. Weber, H. (2001) Parasitic Weed of North-Eastern Region of Ni-geria: A New Potential Threat to Crop Production. The BCPC Conference: Weeds.
[3]	Marambe, B., Wijesundara, S., Tennakoon, K., Peneniya, D. and Jayasinghe, C. (2002) Growth and Development of Cuscuta chinensis Lam. and Its Impact on Selected Crops. Weed Biology and Management, 2, 79-83. http://dx.doi.org/10.1046/j.1445-6664.2002.00051.x
[4]	Lanini, W.T., Miranda-Sazo, M. and Goldwasser, Y. (2004) Management of Cuscuta in Tomato with Resistant Varieties and Herbicide. Proceeding of the 8th International Parasitic Weed Symposium, Durban, 34.
[5]	Lanini, W.T. and Kogan, M. (2005) Biology and Management of Cuscuta in Crops. Cienciae Investigacion Agraria, 32, 165-179.
[6]	Menlebrouck, K., Ameloot, E., Assche, J.A.V., Verheneyen, K., Hermy, M. and Baskin, C.C. (2008) Germination Ecology of the Holoparasite Cuscuta epithymum. Seed Science Research, 18, 25-34.
[7]	Hutchson, J.M. and Ashton, F.M. (1979) Effect of Desiccation and Scarification on the Permeability and Structure of the Seed Coat of Cuscuta campestris. American Journal of Botany, 66, 40-46. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2442623
[8]	Tingey, D.C. and Allred, K.R. (1961) Breaking Dormancy in Seeds of Cuscuta approximate. Weeds, 9, 429-436. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/4040861
[9]	Aliero, B.L. (2004) Effects of Sulphuric Acid, Mechanical Scarification and Wet Heat Treatments on Germination of Seeds of African Locust Bean Tree Parkia biglobosa. African Journal of Biotechnology, 3, 179-181.
[10]	Gomez, K.A. and Gomez, A.A. (1984) Statistical Procedure for Agricultural Research. Wiley, New York.
[11]	Duncan, N.G. and Hasketh, J.D. (1968) Net Photosynthesis Rates, Relative Growth Rate Leaf Number of 22 Cases of Maize and Eight Temperatures. Crop Science, 8, 670-674. http://dx.doi.org/10.2135/cropsci1968.0011183X000800060009x