Application of Resource Efficient and Cleaner Production (RECP) in the Energy Intensive Industry to Promote Low Carbon Industrial Development in Bangladesh


The consumption of natural resources (e.g. raw material, water & energy) in the industries is bringing welfare to the society but per unit of product from the industry is linked with the generation of environmental pollutants and emissions. Resource constraints and climate crisis have come into focus globally; particularly it has become one of the major concerns in the Asia Pacific region. At present, the countries in the Asia Pacific use resources three times greater than the rest of the world to generate one unit of GDP. These countries are more vulnerable to the impacts of resource constraints and climate change. Resource Efficient and Cleaner Production (RECP) has come as a preventive environmental measure to facilitate pollution prevention and reduce carbon intensity per unit of products along with financial profit of the industry. Bangladesh has been considered as one of the transition economies in the South Asia. Industrial sector supports second largest share to the GDP of Bangladesh. The industrial productivity in the country is solely dependent on the locally available natural gas and imported raw materials. Energy Efficiency (EE) and Cleaner Production (CP) measures in the industry can facilitate the promotion of low carbon industrial development through pollution prevention and energy conservation. The main objective of this research is to identify the policy instruments for the promotion of low carbon industrial development in Bangladesh within RECP framework. In this research, ceramics sector has been taken as a research unit. Based on the research objective, three research strategies have been followed which are: 1) review of the existing Environmental Policy, Industrial Policy and Energy Policy of Bangladesh, 2) review of the relevant measures adopted in the regional countries, and 3) case study in a ceramic industry. Stakeholder consultation has been conducted to identify appropriate policy instruments based on multi-criteria evaluation. Through this research, eleven policy instruments have been identified in connection with the promotion of RECP measures in the country with the target of developing low carbon industrial operation. Among the eleven policy instruments seven policy instruments have been identified as prioritized policy instruments based on multi-criteria evaluation through stakeholder consultation. Apart from the prioritized policy instruments the Government of Bangladesh (GoB) has to make realistic sector wise policies and specific policy targets to be achieved within timeline. The GoB has to increase consistency among the policies, strengthen coordination among the relevant institutions, and apply mix of policy instruments.

Share and Cite:

Hossain, T. (2015) Application of Resource Efficient and Cleaner Production (RECP) in the Energy Intensive Industry to Promote Low Carbon Industrial Development in Bangladesh. Low Carbon Economy, 6, 73-85. doi: 10.4236/lce.2015.63009.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.


[1] Giljum, S., Dittrich, M., Bringezu, S., Polzin, C. and Lutter, S. (2010) Resource Use and Resource Productivity in Asia: Trends over the Past 25 Years. Sustainable Europe Research Institute, Vienna.
[2] United Nations Industrial Development Organization (UNIDO) (2010) Resource Productivity for Climate Action. Cleaner Production Unit, Environmental Management Branch, UNIDO, Vienna, Austria. Resource_productivity_Climate_Action.pdf
[3] Huhne, C. (2011) The Economics of Climate Change, Speech by Secretary of State for Energy and Climate Change, 29 June 2011. of-climate-change
[4] Stern, N. (2011) The Low-Carbon Industrial Revolution. Power Point Presentation, Grantham Research Institute on Climate Change and the Environment, LSE.
[5] United Nations Environment Program (UNEP) (2013) Resource Efficiency and Cleaner Production UNEP, Division of Technology, Industry and Economics, Sustainable Consumption & Production Branch.
[6] Almeida, C.M.V.B., Bonilla, S.H., Giannetti, B.F. and Huisingh, D. (2013) Cleaner Production Initiatives and Challenges for a Sustainable World: An Introduction to this Special Volume. Journal of Cleaner Production, 47, 1-10.
[7] Ministry of Finance (MoF) (2012) Bangladesh Economic Review FY 2012-13. Dhaka, Bangladesh: Finance Division, Ministry of Finance, Government of Bangladesh.
[8] IFC (2012) Industry Specific Study on Sustainable Energy Finance Market Potential for Financial Institutions in Bangladesh. South Asia Enterprise Development Facility Project, International Finance Corporation (IFC), World Bank Group. potential+study+Bangladesh.pdf?MOD=AJPERES
[9] Konidari, P. and Mavrakis, D. (2007) A Multi-Criteria Evaluation Method for Climate Change Mitigation Policy Instruments. National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Environmental Policy Group, Panepistimiopolis, KEPA Building, 15784 Athens, Greece.
[10] SYKE (Finnish Environment Institute) (2007) Assessing the Adaptive Capacity of the Finnish Environment and Society under a Changing Climate: FINADAPT. Summary for Policy Makers written by Timothy R. Carter, Helsinki.
[11] Neij, L. and Astrand, K. (2006) Outcome Indicators for the Evaluation of Energy Policy Instruments and Technical Change. Energy Policy, 34, 2662-2676.
[12] VROM, Netherlands Ministry of Housing, Spatial Planning and the Environment (2005) Climate Policy Evaluation Memorandum 2005, On the Way to Kyoto, an Evaluation of Dutch Climate Policy Aimed at Meeting the Kyoto Protocol Commitments. Kyoto.pdf
[13] Blechinger, P.F.H. and Shah, K.U. (2011) A Multi-Criteria Evaluation of Policy Instruments for Climate Change Mitigation in the Power Generation Sector of Trinidad and Tobago. Energy Policy, 39, 6331-6343.

Copyright © 2023 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc.

Creative Commons License

This work and the related PDF file are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.