David Ingersoll, Behavioralism and the Modern Revival of Legal Realism


David Ingersoll’s essay “Karl Llewellyn, American Legal Realism and Contemporary Legal Behavioralism” is a significant, but neglected contribution to our understanding of legal realism in the United States. This article argues that it first anticipates the shape of legal realism’s revival today and shows that Ingersoll was ahead of his time. The once dominant school of legal realism had become a much maligned theory of law when this essay was first published. Ingersoll identifies two varieties of legal realism and most critics focus on only one of them. He argues that legal realism should be revived if it develops its second variety often overlooked which accepts rule skepticism and recognizes the importance of social psychology to predicting legal outcomes more reliably.

Share and Cite:

Brooks, T. (2015) David Ingersoll, Behavioralism and the Modern Revival of Legal Realism. Beijing Law Review, 6, 190-192. doi: 10.4236/blr.2015.63018.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.


[1] Bin, F. (1991). Legal Realism. Beijing: Law Press.
[2] Brooks, T. (2012). Punishment. London: Routledge.
[3] Fisher, W., Horwitz, M., Reed, T. (ed.) (1993). American Legal Realism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
[4] Frank, J. (1949). Courts on Trial: Myth and Reality in American Justice. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
[5] Frank, J. (2008). Law and the Modern Mind. New York: Transaction.
[6] Ingersoll, D. E. (1966). Karl Llewellyn, American Legal Realism and Contemporary Legal Behavioralism. Ethics, 76, 253-266.
[7] Leiter, B. (2001). Legal Realism and Legal Positivism Reconsidered. Ethics, 111, 278-301.
[8] Leiter, B. (2007). Naturalizing Jurisprudence: Essays on Legal Realism and Naturalism in Legal Philosophy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
[9] Llewellyn, K. (2008). The Bramble Bush: The Classic Lectures on the Law and Law School. Oxford: Oxford University Pres.
[10] Paul, J. (1959). The Legal Realism of Jerome N. Frank: A Study of Fact-Skepticism and the Judicial Process. Dordrecht: Springer.
[11] Schlegel, J. (1995). American Legal Realism and Empirical Social Science. Chapel Hill, NC: University of North Carolina.
[12] Zaremby, J. (2015). Legal Realism and American Law. London: Bloomsbury Academic.

Copyright © 2023 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc.

Creative Commons License

This work and the related PDF file are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.