Mind-Body Problem: Does Complexity Exist Objectively?

Bernard Korzeniewski

Faculty of Biochemistry, Biophysics and Biotechnology, Jagiellonian University, Krakow, Poland.

DOI: 10.4236/ojpp.2015.56043                

Abstract

Complexity and related phenomena exist as at least as “objective” and primary aspects/elements of the world as matter, space, and time. On the other hand, space, time, and matter become more and more subjective in modern physics. Complexity causes “something new” to emerge at the level of the whole complex system, which is not present at the level of the elements of this system and cannot be fully reduced to the interactions between these elements. This fact concerns both simple systems, such as atoms composed of a nucleus and electrons or (macro)molecules composed of atoms, as well as very complex systems such as living individuals built of (macro)molecules, organelles, cells, and organs, and conscious brains composed of networks of neurons. In other words, the dynamic complexity consisting of a special concrete spatiotemporal organisation of matter/ energy is as real as space, time, and matter themselves. Therefore, one can speak about the “objective” existence of such a “subjective” phenomenon as (self-)consciousness. The last phenomenon constitutes an aspect, epiphenomenon, or “by-product” of the functional complexity of the (part of the) neural network in the human brain. (Self-)consciousness is equivalent to a certain kind of such complexity and must emerge as a necessary aspect of an appropriately organised dynamic neural network. Therefore, for instance, zombies cannot exist or are even nonsensical. Each dynamic state of the neural network underling self-consciousness is univocally related to one psychic state, and inversely. It is postulated that the mind-body problem can be explained/resolved by a special kind of complexity, which consists of recurrent self-reference, directing on itself the “cognitive centre” in the neural network in the human brain.

Keywords

Self-Consciousness, Life, System Complexity, Human Brain, Conceptual Network

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

[1]	Alberts, B., Johnson, A., Lewis, J., Raff, M., Roberts, K., & Walter, P. (2007). Molecular Biology of the Cell. New York: Garland Science.
[2]	Barrow, J. D. (1992). Pi in the Sky. London: Penguin.
[3]	Coveney, P., & Highfield, R. (1991). The Arrow of Time. The Quest to Solve Science’s Greatest Mystery. London: Flamingo.
[4]	Cryer, P. E. (1991). Regulation of Glucose Metabolism in Man. Journal of Internal Medicine, Supplement, 735, 31-39.
[5]	Davies, P. (1996). About Time: Einstein’s Unfinished Revolution. New York: Simon & Schuster.
[6]	DeLeon, S. B. T., & Davidson, E. H. (2007). Gene Regulation: Gene Control Network in Development. Annual Review of Biophysics and Biomolecular Structure, 36, 191-212. http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev.biophys.35.040405.102002
[7]	Gilbert, S. F. (2010). Developmental Biology. Sunderland: Sinauer Associates.
[8]	Greene, B. (2005). The Fabric of the Cosmos. Space. Time. And the Texture of Reality. New York: Vintage.
[9]	Greene, B. (2010). The Elegant Universe. Superstrings, Hidden Dimensions and the Quest for the Ultimate Dimensions. New York: W. W. Norton & Company.
[10]	Hauser, R. (2006). Blade Runner and the Mind-Body Problem. In R. Greene, & M. K. Silem (Eds.), The Undead and Philosophy. Chicken Soup for the Soulless. Chicago, IL: Open Court Publishing.
[11]	Hume, D. (1975). A Treatise of Human Nature. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
[12]	Jacob, F., & Monod, J. (1961) On the Regulation of Gene Activity. Cold Spring Harbor Symposia on Quantitative Biology, 26, 193-211. http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/SQB.1961.026.01.024
[13]	Kant, I. (1999). Critique of Pure Reason. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
[14]	Kawato, M. (1999). Internal Models for Motor Control and Trajectory Planning. Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 9, 718- 727. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0959-4388(99)00028-8
[15]	Korzeniewski, B. (2001). Cybernetic Formulation of the Definition of Life. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 209, 275-286. http://dx.doi.org/10.1006/jtbi.2001.2262
[16]	Korzeniewski, B. (2005). Confrontation of the Cybernetic Definition of a Living Individual with the Real World. Acta Biotheoretica, 53, 1-28. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10441-005-7000-7
[17]	Korzeniewski, B. (2010). From Neurons to Self-Consciousness. Amherst, MA: Prometheus Books.
[18]	Korzeniewski, B. (2011). Artificial Cybernetic Living Individuals Based on Supramolecular-Level Organization as Dispersed Individuals. Artificial Life, 17, 51-67. http://dx.doi.org/10.1162/artl_a_00017
[19]	Korzeniewski, B. (2013a). Formal Similarities between Cybernetic Definition of Life and Cybernetic Model of Self-Con- sciousness: Universal Definition/Model of Individual. Open Journal of Philosophy, 3, 314-328. http://dx.doi.org/10.4236/ojpp.2013.32049
[20]	Korzeniewski, B. (2013b). Magic of Language. Open Journal of Philosophy, 3, 455-465. http://dx.doi.org/10.4236/ojpp.2013.34067
[21]	Korzeniewski, B. (2014). Philosophy of the Conceptual Network. Open Journal of Philosophy, 4, 451-491. http://dx.doi.org/10.4236/ojpp.2014.44050
[22]	Korzeniewski, B. (2015). Field of Meaning. Saarbrücken: Lambert Publishing Company.
[23]	Penrose, R. (1990). The Emperor’s New Mind: Concerning Computers, Minds, and the Laws of Physics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
[24]	Prigogine, I. (1980). From Being to Becoming. San Francisco, CA: W. H. Freeman.
[25]	Prigogine, I., & Stengers, I. (1984). Order out of Chaos. London: Heinemann.
[26]	Schrodinger, E. (1992). What Is Life? Cambridge: Press Syndicate of the University of Cambridge. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139644129
[27]	Tegmark, M., & Wheeler, J. A. (2003). 100 Years of the Quantum Mysteries. Scientific American, 284, 68-75. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/scientificamerican0201-68
[28]	Umbarger, H. E. (1978). Amino Acid Biosynthesis and Its Regulation. Annual Review of Biochemistry, 47, 533-606. http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev.bi.47.070178.002533
[29]	Wilson, E. O. (1971). The Insect Societies. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
[30]	Wolpert, L., Beddington, R., Jessell, T., Lawrence, P., Meyerowitz, E., & Smith, J. (2002). Principles of Development. Oxford: Oxford University Press.