Behavioral Economics: Where Is It Heading?

Magda Osman

Biological and Experimental Psychology, School of Biological and Chemical Sciences, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK.

DOI: 10.4236/psych.2015.69109                

Abstract

The addition of “behavioral” to economics has given rise to a highly successful field of research. But, is it just a fashionable new trend or is it here to stay? More to the point, how does it differ from its close relative psychology? To answer these questions, the present article considers what behavioral economics is, and where it started, with the aim of trying to forecast what the status of it will be in the future. In forecasting where behavioral economics might be heading, the argument proposed here is that the best clues can be found in psychological research. If, as has been proposed here, behavioral economics partners research trends in psychology, then the futures of both will almost certainly be moving in the same direction. Both are beginning to, and will start to rely on online tools/mobile phone applications to collect richer data revealing dynamic tends over long time horizons, and as technology continues to facilitate ways of looking at group behaviour online, then larger scale studies examining interactions amongst multiple groups of people will become the norm rather than the exception. More specifically this article speculates on the future research focus of researchers in behavioral economics and the extent to which this will overlap with psychological research on judgment and decision-making.

Keywords

Behavioral Economics, Behavioral Research, Behavioral Genetics, Big Data, Online Gaming, Research Methods

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

[1]	Ariely, D., & Loewenstein, G. (2006). The Heat of the Moment: The Effect of Sexual Arousal on Sexual Decision Making. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 19, 87-98. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/bdm.501
[2]	Asendorpt, J. B., Conner, M., De Fruyt, F., De Houwer, J., Denissen, J. J. A., Fiedler, K., Fiedler, S., Funder, D., Kleigl, R., Nosek, B., Perugini, M., Roberts, B., Schmitt, M., Vanaken, M., Weber, H., & Wicherts, J. (2013). Recommendations for Increasing Replicability in Psychology. European Journal of Personality, 27, 108-119. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/per.1919
[3]	Backhouse, R. E., & Fontaine, P. (2010). The History of the Social Sciences since 1945. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511845260
[4]	Bank of England (2015). One Bank Research Agenda Discussion Paper. http://www.bankofengland.co.uk/research/Documents/onebank/discussion.pdf
[5]	Barrett, L. F. (2009). The Future of Psychology: Connecting Mind to Brain. Perspectives on Psychological Sciences, 4, 326-339. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-6924.2009.01134.x
[6]	Benhabib, J., & Bisin, A. (2005) Modeling Internal Commitment Mechanisms and Self-Control: A Neuroeconomics Approach to Consumption Saving Decisions. Game Economics Behavior, 52, 460-492. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.geb.2004.10.004
[7]	Berryessa, C. M., & Cho, M. K. (2013). Ethical, Legal, Social, and Policy Implications of Behavioral Genetics. Annual Review of Genomics and Human Genetics, 14, 515-534. http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev-genom-090711-163743
[8]	Boyd, D., & Crawford, K. (2012). Critical Questions for Big Data: Provocations for a Cultural, Technological, and Scholarly Phenomenon. Information, Communication, & Society, 15, 662-679. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2012.678878
[9]	Bray, J. H. (2010). The Future of Psychology Practice and Science. American Psychologist, 65, 355-369. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0020273
[10]	Brocas, I., & Carrillo, J. D. (2008). The Brain as a Hierarchical Organization. American Economic Review, 98, 1312-1346. http://dx.doi.org/10.1257/aer.98.4.1312
[11]	Cambria, E., Rajagopal, D., Olsher, D., & Das, D. (2013). Big Social Data Analysis. In R. Akerkar (Ed.), Big Data Computing (pp. 401-414). Boca Raton: Chapman and Hall/CRC. http://dx.doi.org/10.1201/b16014-19
[12]	Camerer, C., & Loewenstein, G. (2004). Behavioral Economics: Past, Present, Future. In C. Camerer, G. Loewenstein, & M. Rabin (Eds.), Advances in Behavioral Economics (pp. 3-51). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
[13]	Camerer, C., Loewenstein, G., & Prelec, D. (2005). Neuroeconomics: How Neuroscience Can Inform Economics. Journal of Economic Literature, 43, 9-64. http://dx.doi.org/10.1257/0022051053737843
[14]	Canterbery, E. (2011). A Brief History of Economics: Artful Approaches to the Dismal Science. River Edge, NJ: World Scientific.
[15]	Chater, N. (2015). Can Cognitive Science Create a Cognitive Economics? Cognition, 135, 52-55. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2014.10.015
[16]	Colander, D. (2005). The Future of Economics: The Appropriately Educated in Pursuit of the Knowable. Cambridge Journal of Economic, 29, 927-941. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/cje/bei078
[17]	Cooper, B., & Ramey, E. A. (2014). Pluralism at Work: Alumni Assess an Economics Education. International Review of Economics Education, 16, 63-72. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.iree.2013.07.002
[18]	Davis, J. (2008). The Turn in Recent Economics and Return of Orthodoxy. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 32, 349-366. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/cje/bem048
[19]	De Martino, B., O’Doherty, J. P., Ray, D., Bossaerts, P., & Camerer, C. F. (2013). In the Mind of the Market: Theory of Mind Biases Value Computation during Financial Bubbles. Neuron, 79, 1222-1231. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2013.07.003
[20]	DellaVigna, S., & Malmendier, U. (2006). Paying Not to Go to the Gym. American Economic Review, 96, 694-719. http://dx.doi.org/10.1257/aer.96.3.694
[21]	DeSteno, D., Bartlett, M. Y., Baumann, J., Williams, L. A., & Dickens, L. (2010). Gratitude as Moral Sentiment: Emotion-Guided Cooperation in Economic Exchange. Emotion, 10, 289-293. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0017883
[22]	Ducheneaut, N., & Yee, N. (2013). Data Collection in Massively Multiplayer Online Games: Methods, Analytic Obstacles, and Case Studies. In M. S. El-Nasr, A. Drachen, & A. Canossa (Eds.), Game Analytics (pp. 641-664). London: Springer. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-4769-5_28
[23]	Earl, P. E. (2005). Economics and Psychology in the Twenty-First Century. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 29, 909-926. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/cje/bei077
[24]	Einav, L., & Levin, J. (2014). Economics in the Age of Big Data. Science, 346, Article ID: 1243089. http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.1243089
[25]	Friedman, M. (1962/1976). Price Theory: A Provisional Text. Chicago, MA: Aldine.
[26]	Friesen, L., & Gangadharan, L. (2013). Environmental Markets: What do We Learn from the Lab? Journal of Economic Surveys, 27, 515-535. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/joes.12021
[27]	Gelman, A., & O’Rourke, K. (2014). Discussion: Difficulties in Making Inferences about Scientific Truth from Distributions of Published P-Values. Biostatistics, 15, 18-23. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/biostatistics/kxt034
[28]	Gigerenzer, G. (2015). On the Supposed Evidence for Libertarian Paternalism. Review of Philosophy and Psychology, 1-23. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13164-015-0248-1
[29]	Gigerenzer, G., Hertwig, R., & Pachur, T. (2011). Heuristics: The Foundations of Adaptive Behavior. Oxford: Oxford University Press, Inc. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199744282.001.0001
[30]	Haidt, J. (2007). The New Synthesis in Moral Psychology. Science, 316, 998-1002. http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.1137651
[31]	Hatemi, P. K., Alford, J. R., Hibbing, J. R., Martin, N. G., & Eaves, L. J. (2008). Is There a “Party” in Your Genes? Political Research Quarterly, 62, 584-600. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1065912908327606
[32]	Heap, S. (2013). What Is the Meaning of Behavioral Economics? Cambridge Journal of Economics, 37, 985-1000. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/cje/bes090
[33]	Henrich, J., Boyd, R., Bowles, S., Gintis, H., Fehr, E., Camerer, C., McElreath, R., Gurven, M., Hill, K., Barr, A., Ensminger, J., Tracer, D., Marlow, F., Patton, J., Alvard, M., Gil-White, F., & Henrich, N. (2005). “Economic Man” in Cross-Cultural Perspective: Ethnography and Experiments from 15 Small-Scale Societies. Behavioral Brain Sciences, 28, 795-855. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X05000142
[34]	Hertwig, R., & Ortmann, A. (2001). Experimental Practices in Economics: A Methodological Challenge for Psychologists? Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 24, 383-451.
[35]	Heukelom, F. (2011). What to Conclude from Psychological Experiments: The Contrasting Cases of Experimental and Behavioral Economics. History of Political Economy, 43, 649-681. http://dx.doi.org/10.1215/00182702-1430274
[36]	Hitsch, G. J., Hortaçsu, A., & Ariely, D. (2010). What Makes You Click?—Mate Preferences in Online Dating. Quantitative Marketing and Economics, 8, 393-427. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11129-010-9088-6
[37]	Hodgson, G. M. (2002). How Economics Forgot History: The Problem of Historical Specificity in Social Science. London and New York: Routledge.
[38]	Hsu, M., Bhatt, M., Adolphs, R., Tranel, D., & Camerer, C. F. (2005). Neural Systems Responding to Degrees of Uncertainty in Human Decision-Making. Science, 310, 1680-1683. http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.1115327
[39]	Innocenti, A. (2010). How a Psychologist Informed Economics: The Case of Sidney Siegel. Journal of Economic Psychology, 31, 421-434. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.joep.2010.01.010
[40]	Janssen, M. A., Holahan, R., Allen, L., & Ostrom, E. (2010). Lab Experiments for the Study of Social-Ecological Systems. Science, 328, 613-617. http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.1183532
[41]	Jost, J. T., Glaser, J., Kruglanski, A. W., & Sulloway, F. J. (2003). Political Conservatism as Motivated Social Cognition. Psychological Bulletin, 129, 339-375 http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.129.3.339
[42]	Kahneman, D. (2003). Maps of Bounded Rationality: Psychology for Behavioral Economics. American Economic Review, 93, 1449-1475. http://dx.doi.org/10.1257/000282803322655392
[43]	Kahneman, D. (2013). Foreword. In E. Shafir (Ed.), The Behavioural Foundations of Public Policy (pp. VII-IX). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
[44]	Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1979). Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decisions under Risk. Econometrics, 47, 263-291. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1914185
[45]	Kamenica, E. (2012). Behavioral Economics and Psychology of Incentives. Annual Review of Economics, 4, 427-452. http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev-economics-080511-110909
[46]	Katona, G. (1968). On the Function of Behavioral Theory and Behavioral Research in Economics. American Economic Review, 58, 146-149.
[47]	Kirby, K. N., & Herrnstein, R. J. (1995). Preference Reversals Due to Myopic Discounting of Delayed Reward. Psychological Science, 6, 83-89. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.1995.tb00311.x
[48]	Klein, R. A. et al. (2013). Investigating Variation in Replicability: The “Many Labs” Replication Project, 14 Jun. https://openscienceframework.org/project/WX7Ck
[49]	Kruglanski, A. W., & Gigerenzer, G. (2011). Intuitive and Deliberate Judgments Are Based on Common Principles. Psychological Review, 118, 97-109. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0020762
[50]	Lanteri, A., & Carabelli, A. (2011). Beauty Contested: How Much of Keynes’ Remains in Behavioral Economics’ Beauty Contests? The European Journal of History of Economic Thought, 18, 269-285. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09672560903552512
[51]	Lerner, J. S., Small, D. A., & Loewenstein, G. (2004). Heart Strings and Purse Strings Carryover Effects of Emotions on Economic Decisions. Psychological Science, 15, 337-341. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.0956-7976.2004.00679.x
[52]	Libertus, M. E., Feigenson, L., & Halberda, J. (2011). Preschool Acuity of the Approximate Number System Correlates with School Math Ability. Developmental Science, 14, 1292-1300. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-7687.2011.01080.x
[53]	Lichtenstein, S., & Slovic, P. (Eds.) (2006). The Construction of Preference. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/cbo9780511618031
[54]	Loewenstein, G., & O’Donoghue, T. (2004). Animal Spirits: Affective and Deliberative Influences on Economic Behavior. Pittsburgh, PA: Carnegie Mellon University.
[55]	Loomes, G., & Sugden, R. (1982). Regret Theory: An Alternative Theory of Rational Choice under Uncertainty. Journal of Economics, 92, 805-824. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2232669
[56]	Mallard, G. (2012). Modelling Cognitively Bounded Rationality: An Evaluative Taxonomy. Journal of Economic Surveys, 26, 674-704. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6419.2010.00673.x
[57]	Mar, R. A., Spreng, R. N., & DeYoung, C. G. (2013). How to Produce Personality Neuroscience Research with High Statistical Power and Low Additional Cost. Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience, 13, 674-685. http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/s13415-013-0202-6
[58]	Marsh, A. A., Crowe, S. L., Yu, H. H., Gorodetsky, E. K., Goldman, D., & Blair, R. J. R. (2011). Serotonin Transporter Genotype (5-HTTLPR) Predicts Utilitarian Moral Judgments. PLoS ONE, 6, e25148. http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0025148
[59]	Mijovic-Prelec, D., & Prelec, D. (2010). Self-Deception as Self-Signalling: A Model and Experimental Evidence. Philosophical Transactions of Biological Sciences, 365, 227-240. http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2009.0218
[60]	Milonakis, D., & Fine, B. (2013). From Political Economy to Economics: Method, the Social and the Historical in the Evolution of Economic Theory. London and New York: Routledge.
[61]	Mullainathan., S, & Thaler, R. (2001). Behavioral Economics. In N. Smelser, & P. Baltes (Eds.), International Encyclopedia of the Social and Behavioral Sciences (Volume 20, pp. 1094-1100). Oxford: Oxford University Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/B0-08-043076-7/02247-6
[62]	Newell, B. R., & Shanks, D. R. (2014). Unconscious Influences on Decision Making: A Critical Review. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 37, 1-19. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X12003214
[63]	Osman, M. (2004). An Evaluation of Dual Process Theories of Reasoning. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 11, 998-1010. http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/BF03196730
[64]	Osman, M. (2010). Controlling Uncertainty: Learning and Decision Making in Complex Worlds. Chichester: Wiley Blackwell Publishers. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/9781444328226
[65]	Osman, M. (2013). A Case Study Dual-Process Theories of Higher Cognition—Commentary on Evans & Stanovich (2013). Perspectives on Psychological Science, 8, 248-252. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1745691613483475
[66]	Osman, M. (2014). Future-Minded: The Psychology of Agency and Control. Basingstoke: Palgrave-MacMillan.
[67]	Pashler, H., & Wagenmakers, E. J. (2012). Editors’ Introduction to the Special Section on Replicability in Psychological Science: A Crisis of Confidence? Perspectiveson Psychological Science, 7, 528-530. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1745691612465253
[68]	Samson, A. (2014). The Behavioral Economics Guide 2014 (With a Foreword by George Loewenstein and Rory Sutherland). An Introduction to Behavioral Economics.
[69]	Samuelson, W., & Zeckhauser, R. J. (1988). Status Quo Bias in Decision Making. Journal of Risk &Uncertainty, 1, 7-59. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF00055564
[70]	Sanfey, A. G., Rilling, J. K., Aronson, J. A., Nystrom, L. E., & Cohen, J. D. (2003). The Neural Basis of Economic Decision-Making in the Ultimatum Game. Science, 300, 1755-1758. http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.1082976
[71]	Santos, A. (2011). Behavioral and Experimental Economics: Are They Really Transforming Economics? Cambridge Journal of Economics, 35, 705-728. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/cje/beq049
[72]	Sent, E. M. (2004). Behavioral Economics: How Psychology Made Its (Limited) Way Back into Economics. History of Political Economy, 36, 735-760. http://dx.doi.org/10.1215/00182702-36-4-735
[73]	Shim, K. J., Pathak, N., Ahmad, M. A., DeLong, C., Borbora, Z., Mahapatra, A., & Srivastava, J. (2011). Analyzing Human Behavior from Multiplayer Online Game Logs: A Knowledge Discovery Approach. IEEE Intelligent Systems, 26, 85-89.
[74]	Simon, H. A. (1959). Theories of Decision-Making in Economics and Behavioral Science. American Economic Review, 49, 253-283.
[75]	Small, D. A., & Loewenstein, G. (2003). Helping a Victim or Helping the Victim: Altruism and Identifiably. Journal of Risk& Uncertainty, 26, 5-16. http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1022299422219
[76]	Stafford, T., & Dewar, M. (2014). Tracing the Trajectory of Skill Learning with a Very Large Sample of Online Game Players. Psychological Science, 25, 511-518. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0956797613511466
[77]	Sunstein, C. R. (2014). Why Nudge: The Politics of Libertarian Paternalism. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
[78]	Taylor, L., Schroeder, R., & Meyer, E. (2014). Emerging Practices and Perspectives on Big Data Analysis in Economics: Bigger and Better or More of the Same? Big Data & Society, 1. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2053951714536877
[79]	Thaler, R. H., & Sunstein, C. R. (2008). Nudge: Improving Decisions about Health, Wealth, and Happiness. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
[80]	Thimm, A. L. (1965). The New Behavioral Economics. American Behavioral Scientist, 8, 29-33.
[81]	Tversky, A., Sattath, S., & Slovic, P. (1988). Contingent Weighting in Judgment and Choice. Psychological Review, 95, 371- 384. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.95.3.371
[82]	Wagenmakers, E. J., Wetzels, R., Borsboom, D., & van der Maas, H. L. J. (2011). Why Psychologists Must Change the Way They Analyze Their Data: The Case of Psi: Comment on Bem (2011). Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 100, 426-432. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0022790
[83]	Weaver, R., & Prelec, D. (2013). Creating Truth-Telling Incentives with the Bayesian Truth Serum. Journal of Marketing Research, 50, 289-302. http://dx.doi.org/10.1509/jmr.09.0039
[84]	Wolfe, P. J. (2013). Making Sense of Big Data. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 110, 18031-18032. http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1317797110