Research on Explicit and Tacit Knowledge Interaction in Software Process Improvement Project

.
DOI: 10.4236/jsea.2011.46038   PDF   HTML     6,159 Downloads   10,984 Views   Citations

Abstract

This research develops a knowledge model for Software Process Improvement (SPI) project based on knowledge creation theory and its twenty-four measurement items, and proposes two hypothesizes about the interaction of explicit knowledge and tacit knowledge in SPI. Eleven factors are extracted through statistical analysis. Three knowledge-creation practices for capturing tacit knowledge contribute greatly to SPI, which are communication among members, crossover collaboration in practical work and pair programming. Two knowledge-creation practices for capturing explicit knowledge have significant positive impact on SPI, which are integrating project document and on-the-job training. Ultimately, suggestions for improvement are put forward, that is, encouraging communication among staff and integrating documents in real time, and future research is also illustrated.

Share and Cite:

J. Wan, D. Wan, W. Luo and X. Wan, "Research on Explicit and Tacit Knowledge Interaction in Software Process Improvement Project," Journal of Software Engineering and Applications, Vol. 4 No. 6, 2011, pp. 335-344. doi: 10.4236/jsea.2011.46038.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

[1] I. Nonaka, “The Knowledge-Creating Company,” Harvard Business Review, Vol. 69, No. 6, 1991, pp. 96-104.
[2] M. Polanyi, “The Tacit Dimension,” Doubleday, Garden City, New York, 1966.
[3] W. S. Humphrey, “Managing the Software Process,” Addison-Wesley, Reading, 1989.
[4] A. Fuggetta, “Software Process: A Roadmap,” Proceedings of the Conference on the Future of Software Engineering, Limerick, 4-11 June 2000, pp. 25-34.
[5] J. P. Wan and J. M. Yang, “Knowledge Management in Software Process Improvement,” Application Research of Computer, Vol. 19, No. 5, 2002, pp. 1-3.
[6] M. Blanco, P. Gutiérrez and G. Satriani, “SPI Patterns: Learning from Experience,” IEEE Software, Vol. 18, No. 3, 2001, pp. 28-35. doi:10.1109/52.922722
[7] J. D. Herbsleb and D. R. Goldenson, “A Systematic Survey of CMM Experience and Results,” Proceedings of the18th International Conference on Software Engineering, Berlin, March 1996, pp. 323-330.
[8] R. S. Pressman, “Software Engineering: A Practitioner’s Approach,” 5th Edition, McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., New York, 2001, p. 19.
[9] J. P. Wan, “Research on Software Product Support Structure,” Journal of Software Engineering and Applications, Vol. 2, No. 3, 2009, pp. 174-194. doi:10.4236/jsea.2009.23025
[10] G. Anand, P. T. Ward and M. V. Tatikonda, “Role of Explicit and Tacit Knowledge in Six Sigma Projects: An Empirical Examination of Differential Project Success,” Journal of Operations Management, Vol. 28, No. 4, 2010, pp. 303-315. doi:10.1016/j.jom.2009.10.003
[11] I. Nonaka and G. V. Krogh, “Perspective—Tacit Knowledge and Knowledge Conversion: Controversy and Advancement in Organizational Knowledge Creation Theory,” Organization Science, Vol. 20, No. 3, 2009, pp. 635-652. doi:10.1287/orsc.1080.0412
[12] J. P. Wan, Q. J. Liu, D. J. Li and H. B. Xu, “Research on Knowledge Transfer Influencing Factors in Software Process Improvement,” Journal of Software Engineering and Applications, Vol. 3, No. 2, 2010, pp. 134-140. doi:10.4236/jsea.2010.32017
[13] J. P. Wan and R. Wang, “The Exploratory Analysis on Knowledge Creation Effective Factors in Software Requirement Development,” Journal of Software Engineering and Applications, Vol. 3, No. 6, 2010, pp. 580-587.
[14] J. P. Wan, H. Zhang, D. Wan and D. Y. Huang, “Research on Knowledge Creation in Software Requirement Development,” Journal of Software Engineering and Applications, Vol. 3, No. 5, 2010, pp. 487-494. doi:10.4236/jsea.2010.35055
[15] J. P. Wan and R. Wang, “Empirical Research on Critical Success Factors of Agile Software Process Improvement,” Journal of Software Engineering and Applications, Vol. 3, No. 12, 2010, pp. 1131-1140. doi:10.4236/jsea.2010.312132
[16] R. J. Jensen and G. Szulanski, “Template Use and the Effectiveness of Knowledge Transfer,” Management Science, Vol. 53, No. 11, 2007, pp. 1716-1730. doi:10.1287/mnsc.1070.0740

  
comments powered by Disqus

Copyright © 2020 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc.

Creative Commons License

This work and the related PDF file are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.