Fixed Point Results by Altering Distances in Fuzzy Metric Spaces ()
1. Introduction
The concept of fuzzy sets was introduced by Zadeh. With the concept of fuzzy sets, the fuzzy metric space was introduced by Kramosil and Michalek [1] . Grabiec [2] proved the contraction principle in the setting of fuzzy metric space. Also, George and Veermani [3] modified the notion of fuzzy metric space with the help of continuous t-norm. Fuzzy set theory has applications in applied sciences such as neural network theory, stability theory, mathematical programming, modelling theory, engineering sciences, medical sciences (medical genetics, nervous system), image processing, control theory and communication.
Boyd and Wong [4] introduced the notion of Φ-contractions. In 1997, Alber and Guerre-Delabriere [5] defined the ϕ-weak contraction which was a generalization of Φ-contractions. Many researchers studied the notion of weak contractions on different settings which generalized the Banach Contraction Mapping Principle. Another interesting and significant fixed point results as a generalization of Banach Contraction Principle have been established by using the notion of alerting distance function, a new notion propounded by Khan et al. [6] . Altering Distance Functions are control functions which alter the distance between two points in a metric space. For more details, we refer to [6] - [12] .
Sastry et al. [13] proved the following:
Theorem 2.4 [13] Let
and
be weakly commuting pairs of self mappings of a complete metric space
satisfying
1) 
2) There exists
such that
, where

and
is continuous at zero, monotonically increasing,
and
if and only if
. Suppose that A and S are
-compatible and S is continuous. Then A, B, S and T have a unique common fixed point.
On the basis of theorem 2.4 of [13] , Sastry posed the following open problem:
Is theorem 2.4 of [13] valid if we replace continuity of S by continuity of A?
In this paper, we prove common fixed point theorems which provide an affirmative answer to the above question on existence of fixed point in fuzzy metric spaces.
2. Preliminaries
To set up our results in the next section, we recall some basic definitions.
Definition 2.1 [14] A fuzzy set A in X is a function with domain X and values in [0, 1].
Definition 2.2 [14] A binary operation *: [0, 1] × [0, 1] ® [0, 1] is a continuous t-norm if ([0, 1], *) is a topological abelianmonoid with unit 1 such that.
whenever 
Definition 2.3 [15] The 3-tuple (X, M, *) is called a fuzzy metric space if X is an arbitrary set, * is a continuous t-norm and M is a fuzzy set on X2 × [0, ∞) satisfying the following conditions:
(FM-1) M(x, y, t) > 0 and M(x, y, 0) = 0,
(FM-2) M(x, y, t) = 1 if x = y,
(FM-3) M(x, y, t) = M(y, x, t),
(FM-4) M(x, y, t) * M(y, z, s) ≤ M(x, z, t + s),
(FM-5) M(x, y, t): (0, ∞) ® [0,1] is continuous, for all x, y, z ∊ X and s, t > 0.
We note that
is non-decreasing for all x, y ∊ X.
Definition 2.4 Let
be a fuzzy metric space. A sequence
is said to be
1) G-Cauchy (i.e., Cauchy sequence in sense of Grabiec [5] ) if
for all t > 0 and each p > 0.
2) Convergent to a point x ∊ X if
for all t > 0.
Definition 2.5 [16] -[18] A pair of self mappings (f, g) on fuzzy metric space
is said to be reciprocally continuous if
![]()
whenever
is a sequence in X such that
![]()
for some z in X.
Definition 2.6 An altering distance function or control function is a function ![]()
such that the following axioms hold:
1)
is monotonic increasing and continuous;
2)
if and only if t = 0.
Lemma 2.1 [5] . Let (X, M, *) be fuzzy metric space and for all
,
and if for a number
,
. Then x = y.
Lemma 2.2 [5] . Let (X, M, *) be fuzzy metric space and
be a sequence in X. If there exists a number
such that
for all
and n = 1, 2,・・・
Then
is a Cauchy sequence in X.
Lemma 2.3 Let
is continuous and decreasing
if and only if
. Then
and
implies
.
Definition 2.7 [13] A pair of self mappings
on fuzzy metric space
is said to be ψ-com- patible if
![]()
whenever
is a sequence in X such that
![]()
for some z in X.
3. Main Results
Theorem 3.1 Let
and
be weakly commuting pairs of self mappings of a complete fuzzy metric space
satisfying
(3.1) ![]()
(3.2) There exists
such that
, where
![]()
Suppose that A and S are
-compatible and A is continuous. Then A, B, S and T have a unique common fixed point.
Proof: Let
be any fixed point in X. Define sequences
and
in X given by the rule
(3.3)
and ![]()
This can be done by virtue of (3.1). Now, we prove that
is a Cauchy sequence. For
in (3.2), we have
![]()
As ![]()
If
,
a contradiction and hence
,
but as
is decreasing so we have
and hence by lemma (2.2), the sequence
is a Cauchy sequence in X. Since X is complete, there is a point z in X such that
(3.4)
and
as
.
Now, suppose that A and S are
-compatible then we have
(3.5)
and
implies that ![]()
Also, A is continuous, so by (3.3),
(3.6)
and
as ![]()
We claim that
. By (3.5), we get
![]()
as
. By lemma (2.3)
as
and so
.
Also, since
for some w in X and corresponding to each
, there exists a
such that
. Thus, we have
and
. Also, since
, corresponding to each
, there exists a
such that
Thus we have
and
.
Now, we claim that
as
. Using (3.2) with ![]()
.
Letting
,
,
as
is decreasing, so we have
![]()
Thus, we have
as
.
Also, we claim that
. Using (3.2) for ![]()
![]()
Letting
, we get
Thus, we have ![]()
Again, since
, so there exists u in X such that
That is
. Lastly, we show that
. Then by (3.2) with
, we have
![]()
(3.7) This gives
and hence we have ![]()
As A and S are weakly commuting, we have
and hence
(3.8) ![]()
Also, B and T are weakly commuting, we get
(3.9) ![]()
Finally, we show that
. Again using (3.5), (3.6) and (3.2) with
.
![]()
which gives that
Therefore
is a common fixed point of A and S. Similarly, we can show that
and since
we have
, a common fixed point of B and T. Finally,
we have
as a common fixed point for A, B, S and T. The uniqueness follows from 2) and hence the theorem.
Theorem 3.2 Let
and
be weakly commuting pairs of self mappings of a complete fuzzy metric space
satisfying
(3.10) ![]()
(3.11) There exists
such that
, where
![]()
. Suppose that A and S are
-compatible pair of reciprocal continuous mappings. Then A, B, S and T have a unique common fixed point.
Proof: Let
be any fixed point in X. Define sequences
and
in X given by the rule
and
.
As in theorem 3.1, the sequence
is a Cauchy sequence in X. Since X is complete, there is a point z in X such that
and as.
Now, suppose that A and S are ψ-compatible pair of reciprocal continuous mappings, so we have
and ![]()
Also,
-compatibility of A and S implies that
(3.12) ![]()
By lemma (2.3)
as
. We claim that
.
(3.13)
.
Since,
, there is a point w in X such that
. By (3.13),
(3.14) ![]()
Now, we show that
. Suppose
. Using (3.11), we have
![]()
A contradiction. Hence
. Therefore by (3.14)
(3.15) ![]()
As A and S are weakly commuting, we have
and hence
(3.16) ![]()
Also, B and T are weakly commuting, we get
(3.17) ![]()
Finally, we show that
Again using (3.11) with
.
![]()
which gives that
. Therefore,
is a common fixed point of A and S. Similarly, we can show that
and since
, we have
, a common fixed point of B and T. Finally,
, we have
as a common fixed point for A, B, S and T. The uniqueness follows from 2) and hence the theorem.
Acknowledgements
The authors wish to acknowledge with thanks the Deanship of Scientific Research, Jazan University, Jazan, K.S.A., for their technical and financial support for this research.