Collective Finance Models for Sustainable Water Projects

DOI: 10.4236/jep.2015.65046   PDF   HTML   XML   2,870 Downloads   3,367 Views   Citations

Abstract

Waterbasin management is an exemplar problem of collective action, since many actors influence and are influenced by changes in a waterbasin. The present paper uses the example of finance of control of surface water run-off as an instance of (potential) collective action involving finance. Five innovative financing schemes for new waterbasin management infrastructures are assessed with respect to the actors who provide the finance and how the projects are governed: 1) financing through taxes; 2) third-party financing; 3) financing by stakeholders; 4) financing through fullcost pricing; and 5) financing by developers and/or landowners.

Share and Cite:

Crawford-Brown, D. and Gossé, J. (2015) Collective Finance Models for Sustainable Water Projects. Journal of Environmental Protection, 6, 477-493. doi: 10.4236/jep.2015.65046.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

[1] Deloitte (2008) Building Flexibility: New Delivery Models for Public Infrastructure Projects. Deloitte and Touche LLP, London.
[2] UNEP (2006) Financing Water: Risks and Opportunities. United Nations Environment Programme, Issues Paper, Finance Initiative.
[3] Macauley (2009) Integrated Catchment Management Planning: A Handbook for Project Officers. Land Use Research Institute, CATCH Workshop Proceedings, Scotland.
[4] Defra (2011) Flood Risk and Insurance: A Roadmap to 2013 and beyond Final Report of the Flood Insurance Working Groups. Department for Environment Food and Rural Affairs.
[5] Code for Sustainable Homes (2010) A Cost Review. Communities and Local Government.
[6] King’s Lynn and West Norfolk Borough Council (2009) Outline Water Cycle Study. Final Report.
[7] Defra (2011) National Standards for Sustainable Drainage Systems Designing, Constructing, Operating and Maintaining Drainage for Surface Runoff. Department for Environment Food and Rural Affairs.
[8] Code for Sustainable Homes (2010) Technical Guide. Communities and Local Government.
[9] Ofwat (2009) Price Review. Office of Water, Birmingham.
[10] Environment Agency (2010) Harvesting Rainwater for Domestic Uses: An Information Guide.
[11] Defra (2012) Waste Water Treatment in the United Kingdom—2012. Implementation of the European Union Urban Waste Water Treatment Directive—91/271/EEC. Department for Environment Food and Rural Affairs.
[12] OECD (2007) Infrastructure to 2030, Vol. 2, Mapping Policy for Electricity, Water and Transport.
[13] Raucher, R., Rubin, S., Crawford-Brown, D. and Lawson, M. (2011) Benefit-Cost Analysis for Drinking Water Standards: Efficiency, Equity, and Affordability Considerations in Small Communities. Journal of Benefit-Cost Analysis, 1, 1-22.
[14] Reichardt, A., Fuerst, F., Rottke, N. and Zietz, J. (2012) Sustainable Building Certification and the Rent Premium: A Panel Data Approach. Journal of Real Estate Research, 34, 99-126.
[15] Fuerst, F. and McAllister, P. (2011) The Impact of Energy Performance Certificates on the Rental and Capital Values of Commercial Property Assets. Energy Policy, 39, 6608-6614.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2011.08.005
[16] Environment Agency (2008) Water Resources in England and Wales—Current State and Future Pressures.
[17] EEA (2003) Indicator Fact Sheet. (WQ05) Water Prices.
[18] Severn Trent Water & National Grid (2012) Changing Course through Sustainable Financing: Options to Encourage Equity Financing in the Water and Energy Sectors.
www.severntrent.com/upload/pdf/Changing_course_sustainable_financing.pdf

  
comments powered by Disqus

Copyright © 2020 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc.

Creative Commons License

This work and the related PDF file are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.