Stroop-Like Interference in the Fruit Stroop Test in Typical Development


This study examined Stroop-like interference in the fruit Stroop test among 271 5 - 12-year-old children and young adults divided into five age groups: 64 5 - 6-year-olds, 65 7 - 8-year-olds, 60 9 - 10-year-olds, 46 11 - 12-year-olds, and 36 young adults (18 - 23-year-olds). Participants were ad-ministered a paper-and-pencil version of the fruit Stroop test, which includes the canonical color task, the superficial color task, and the fruit name task. In these tasks, participants were presented with line-drawings of fruits having strongly associated colors (e.g., yellow banana) and were asked to name the ink colors of the fruits, name the colors the fruit “should be”, or read the fruit name. The results indicated robust interference in the canonical color task of the fruit Stroop test, suggesting that this task is useful to assess individual differences of inhibitory control in typical development.

Share and Cite:

Okuzumi, H. , Ikeda, Y. , Otsuka, N. , Saito, R. , Oi, Y. , Hirata, S. , Haishi, K. & Kokubun, M. (2015). Stroop-Like Interference in the Fruit Stroop Test in Typical Development. Psychology, 6, 643-649. doi: 10.4236/psych.2015.65062.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.


[1] Anderson, P. (2002). Assessment and Development of Executive Function (EF) during Childhood. Child Neuropsychology, 8, 71-82.
[2] Archibald, S. J., & Kerns, K. A. (1999). Identification and Description of New Tests of Executive Functioning in Children. Child Neuropsychology, 5, 115-129.
[3] Barkley, R. A. (1997). Behavioral Inhibition, Sustained Attention, and Executive Functions: Constructing a Unifying Theory of ADHD. Psychological Bulletin, 121, 65-94.
[4] Brocki, K. C., & Bohlin, G. (2004). Executive Functions in Children Aged 6 to 13: A Dimensional and Developmental Study. Developmental Neuropsychology, 26, 571-593.
[5] Catale, C., & Meulemans, T. (2009). The Real Animal Size Test (RAST): A New Measure of Inhibitory Control for Young Children. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 25, 83-91.
[6] Cohen, J. D., Dunbar, K., & McClelland, J. L. (1990). On the Control of Automatic Processes: A Parallel Distributed Processing Account of the Stroop Effect. Psychological Review, 97, 332-361.
[7] Diamond, A. (2013). Executive Functions. Annual Review of Psychology, 64, 135-168.
[8] Friedman, N. P., & Miyake, A. (2004). The Relations among Inhibition and Interference Control Functions: A Latent-Vari- able Analysis. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 133, 101-135.
[9] Ikeda, Y., Hirata, S., Maeda, W., Okuzumi, H., Kokubun, M., Ambe, H., Fujieda, Y., Suijo, K., Hayashi, J., & Iteya, M. (2013) Relationship between Stroop/Reverse-Stroop Interference and Postural Sway When Standing in Elderly People. Comprehensive Psychology, 2, 9.
[10] Ikeda, Y., Hirata, S., Okuzumi, H., & Kokubun, M. (2010). Features of Stroop and Reverse-Stroop Interference: Analysis by Response Modality and Evaluation. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 110, 654-660.
[11] Ikeda, Y., Okuzumi, H., & Kokubun, M. (2013a). Age-Related Trends of Stroop-Like Interference in Animal Size Tests in 5- to 12-Year-Old Children and Young Adults. Child Neuropsychology, 19, 276-291.
[12] Ikeda, Y., Okuzumi, H., & Kokubun, M. (2013b). Stroop/Reverse-Stroop Interference in Typical Development and Its Relation to Symptoms of ADHD. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 34, 2391-2398.
[13] Ikeda, Y., Okuzumi, H., Kokubun, M., & Haishi, K. (2011). Age-Related Trends of Interference Control in School-Age Children and Young Adults in the Stroop Color-Word Test. Psychological Reports, 108, 577-584.
[14] Loher, S., & Roebers, C. M. (2013). Executive Functions and Their Differential Contribution to Sustained Attention in 5- to 8-Year-Old Children. Journal of Educational and Developmental Psychology, 3, 51-63.
[15] Ludwig, C., Borella, E., Tettamanti, M., & de Ribaupierre, A. (2010). Adult Age Differences in the Color Stroop Test: A Comparison between an Item-by-Item and a Blocked Version. Archives of Gerontology and Geriatrics, 51, 135-142.
[16] Macdonald, J. A., Beauchamp, M. H., Crigan, J. A., & Anderson, P. J. (2014). Age-Related Differences in Inhibitory Control in the Early School Years. Child Neuropsychology, 20, 509-526.
[17] MacLeod, C. M. (1991). Half a Century of Research on the Stroop Effect: An Integrative Review. Psychological Bulletin, 109, 163-203.
[18] McDowd, J. M., Oseas-Kreger, D. M., & Filion, D. L. (1995). Inhibitory Processes in Cognition and Aging. In F. N. Dempster, & C. J. Brainerd (Eds.), Interference and Inhibition in Cognition (pp. 363-400). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
[19] Michel, E., & Roebers, C. M. (2008). Children in Regular and Special Needs Classes: Cognitive and Non-Cognitive Aspects. Swiss Journal of Psychology, 67, 249-259.
[20] Miyake, A., & Friedman, N. P. (2012). The Nature and Organization of Individual Differences in Executive Functions: Four General Conclusions. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 21, 8-14.
[21] Neuenschwander, R., Cimeli, P., Röthlisberger, M., & Roebers, C. M. (2013). Personality Factors in Elementary School Children: Contributions to Academic Performance over and above Executive Functions? Learning and Individual Differences, 25, 118-125.
[22] Nichelli, F., Scala, G., Vago, C., Riva, D., & Bulgheroni, S. (2005). Age-Related Trends in Stroop and Conflicting Motor Response Task Findings. Child Neuropsychology, 11, 431-443.
[23] Nigg, J. T. (2000). On Inhibition/Disinhibition in Developmental Psychopathology: Views from Cognitive and Personality Psychology and a Working Inhibition Taxonomy. Psychological Bulletin, 126, 220-246.
[24] Ozonoff, S., & Jensen, J. (1999). Brief Report: Specific Executive Function Profiles in Three Neurodevelopmental Disorders. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 29, 171-177.
[25] Prevor, M. B., & Diamond, A. (2005). Color-Object Interference in Young Children: A Stroop Effect in Children 3½ - 6½ Years Old. Cognitive Development, 20, 256-278.
[26] Pritchatt, D. (1968). An Investigation into Some of the Underlying Associative Verbal Processes of the Stroop Colour Effect. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 20, 351-359.
[27] Roebers, C. M., Röthlisberger, M., Neuenschwander, R., Cimeli, P., Michel, E., & Jäger, K. (2014). The Relation between Cognitive and Motor Performance and Their Relevance for Children’s Transition to School: A Latent Variable Approach. Human Movement Science, 33, 284-297.
[28] Röthlisberger, M., Neuenschwander, R., Cimeli, P., & Roebers, C. M. (2013). Executive Functions in 5- to 8-Year Olds: Developmental Changes and Relationship to Academic Achievement. Journal of Educational and Developmental Psychology, 3, 153-167.
[29] Song, Y., & Hakoda, Y. (2011). An Asymmetric Stroop/Reverse-Stroop Interference Phenomenon in ADHD. Journal of Attention Disorders, 15, 499-505.
[30] Wright, I., Waterman, M., Prescott, H., & Murdoch-Eaton, D. (2003). A New Stroop-Like Measure of Inhibitory Function Development: Typical Developmental Trends. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 44, 561-575.
[31] Yasumura, A., Kokubo, N., Yamamoto, H., Yasumura, Y., Nakagawa, E., Kaga, M., Hiraki, K., & Inagaki, M. (2014). Neurobehavioral and Hemodynamic Evaluation of Stroop and Reverse Stroop Interference in Children with Attention-Deficit/ Hyperactivity Disorder. Brain and Development, 36, 97-106.

Copyright © 2021 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc.

Creative Commons License

This work and the related PDF file are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.