Assessment of Selective Reduction Strategies over Northeastern Regions of Ohio Using a Photochemical Grid Model—A Case Study


This study is primarily focused on Cleveland-Akron-Lorain nonattainment area in northeastern Ohio. The base year 2002 considered in this study witnessed one of the worst cases of ozone pollution in this region with ozone values exceeding previous 8-hour ozone standards of 84 ppb. The photochemical modeling system CAMx was applied to compute relative reduction factors, which were used subsequently to scale the base year (2002) values at the ozone monitoring sites to estimate the ozone design values for the year 2009 in Cleveland area for different emissions reduction scenarios. The results disclose that the largest change in the 2009 ozone design values consequent to applying auxiliary emission control strategies is between 1 and 1.5 ppb, which still left certain counties in northeastern Ohio unable to demonstrate attainment. The results are important in the development of emission control strategies in today’s context with instillation of even more stringent ozone standards and potential future increases in ozone concentrations due to climate change.

Share and Cite:

Biswas, J. , Crist, K. and Ghosh, S. (2015) Assessment of Selective Reduction Strategies over Northeastern Regions of Ohio Using a Photochemical Grid Model—A Case Study. Atmospheric and Climate Sciences, 5, 106-119. doi: 10.4236/acs.2015.52008.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.


[1] Rao, S.T. and Zurbenko, I.G. (1994) Detecting and Tracking Changes in Ozone Air Quality. Journal of Air and Waste Management Association, 44, 1089-1092.
[2] Chameides, W.I., Saylor, R.D. and Cowling, E.B. (1997) Ozone Pollution in the Rural United States and the New NAAQS. Science, 276, 916.
[3] USEPA (2010) National Ambient Air Quality Standards Proposed Rule. Federal Register, 75, 2938-3052.
[4] USEPA (2007) Guidance on the Use of Models and Other Analyses for Demonstrating Attainment of Air Quality Goals for Ozone, PM2.5, and Regional Haze. EPA-454/B-07-002, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency: Research Triangle Park, 2007.
[5] Berman, J.D., Fann, N., Hollingsworth, J.W., Pinkerton, K.E., Rom, W. N., Szema, A.M., Breysse, P.N., White, R.H. and Curriero, F.C. (2012) Health Benefits from Large-Scale Ozone Reduction in the United States. Environmental Health Perspectives, 120, 1-30
[6] Jones, J.M, Hogrefe, C., Henry, R.F., Ku, J. and Sistla, G. (2005) An Assessment of the Sensitivity and Reliability of the Relative Reduction Factor Approach in the Development of 8-Hr Ozone Attainment Plans. Journal of Air and Waste Management Association, 55, 13-19.
[7] Houyoux, M.R., Vucovich, J.M., Coats Jr., C.J., Wheeler, N.J.M. and Kasibhatla, P. (2000) Emission Inventory Development and Processing for the Seasonal Model for Regional Air Quality (SMRAQ) Project. Journal of Geophysical Research, 105, 9079-9090.
[8] Kasibhatla, P. and Chameides, W.L. (2000) Seasonal Modeling of Regional Ozone Pollution in the Eastern United States. Geophysical Research Letters, 27, 1415-1418.
[9] Tesche, T.W., McNally, D.E., Loomis, C.F., Morris, R.E. and Mansell, G.E. (2003) Air Quality Modeling Analysis for the San Juan Early Action Ozone Compact, Ozone Modeling Protocol. Alpine Geophysics, Ft. Wright Kentucky and ENVIRON International Corporation, Novato.
[10] USEPA (1999) Draft Guidance on the Use of Models and Other Analyses in Attainment Demonstrations for the 8-Hour Ozone NAAQS. EPA-454/R-99-004, Environmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park, 27711.
[11] Arunachalam, S., Holland, A., Do, B. and Abraczinskas, M. (2006) A Quantitative Assessment of Influence of Grid Resolution on Predictions of Future-Year Air Quality in North Carolina, USA. Atmospheric Environment, 40, 5010-5026.
[12] Sistla, G., Hogrefe, C., Hao, W., Ku, J.-Y., Zalewsky, E., Henry, R.F. and Civerolo, K. (2004) An Operational Assessment of the Application of the Relative Reduction Factors (RRF) in Demonstration of Attainment of the 8-hr Ozone National Ambient Air Quality Standard (NAAQS). Journal of Air and Waste Management Association, 54, 950-959.
[13] Biswas, J., John, K. and Farooqui, Z. (2009) Impact Assessment of Global Temperature Perturbations on Urban and Regional Ozone Levels in South Texas. In: Singh, G.P. and Oh, J.H., Eds., Advances in Geosciences, Volume 10: Atmospheric Science (AS), World Scientific, Singapore, 197-211.
[14] ENVIRON (2003) User’s Guide to the Comprehensive Air Quality Model with Extensions (CAMx). Version 4.00, January 2003.
[15] ENVIRON International Corporation (2010) User’s Guide Emissions Processor Version 3.20 (EPS3). ENVIRON International Corporation, Novato, 184.
[16] Grell, G.A., Dudhia, J. and Stauffer, D. (1994) A Description of the Fifth-Generation State/NCAR Mesoscale Model (MM5). NCAR Technical Note, TN-398 + STR, National Center for Atmospheric Research, Boulder, 138.
[17] Baker, K.R. (2005) CAMx4 Model Performance for Ozone in the Upper Midwest over the Summers of 2001, 2002 and 2003. Proceedings of the 98th Annual Meeting of the Air and Waste Management Association, Minneapolis, 21-24 June 2005.
[18] NRC (1991) Rethinking the Ozone Problem in Urban and Regional Air Pollution. National Academy Press, Washington DC, 524 p.
[19] Tesche, T., Georgopoulos, W.P., Seinfield, J.H., Lurman, F. and Roth, P.M. (1990) Improvements in Procedures for Evaluating Photochemical Models. Rep. A832-103, California Air Resources Board, Sacramento, 200 p.
[20] Fox, D.G. (1981) Judging Air Quality Model Performance. Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society, 62, 599-609.<0599:JAQMP>2.0.CO;2
[21] Sistla, G., Zhou, N., Hao, W., Ku, J.Y. and Rao, S.T. (1996) Effects of Uncertainties in Meteorological Inputs of Urban Airshed Model Predictions and Ozone Control Strategies. Atmospheric Environment, 30, 2011-2025.
[22] USEPA (1991) Guideline for Regulatory Applications for Regulatory Applications of the Urban Airshed Model. EPA-450/4-91/013, Environmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park.
[23] USEPA (2007) Guidance on the Use of Models and Other Analyses for Demonstrating Attainment of Air Quality Goals for Ozone, PM2.5, and Regional Haze. EPA-454/B-07-002, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park.
[24] NRC (1999) Ozone-Forming Potential of Reformulated Gasoline. National Academy Press, Washington DC, 212.
[25] Sillman, S. (1999) The Relation between Ozone, NOx and Hydrocarbons in Urban and Rural Polluted Environments. Atmospheric Environment, 33, 1821-1845.
[26] Pagnotti, V. (1987) A Meso-Meteorological Feature Associated with High Ozone Concentrations in the Northeastern United States. Journal of Air Pollution Control Association, 37, 720-732.
[27] Morris, R.E., Wilson, G.M., Shepard, S.B. and Lee, K. (1997) Ozone Source Apportionment Modeling Using the 1991 OTAG Episode for the Northeast Corridor and Lake Michigan Regions. ENVIRON International Corporation Draft Report to Cinergy Corporation, Plainfield, IN.
[28] Dunker, A., Yarwood, G., Ortmann, J. and Wilson, G. (2002) Comparison of Source Apportionment and Source Sensitivity of Ozone in a Three-Dimensional Air Quality Model. Environmental Science and Technology, 36, 2953-2964.
[29] Sillman, S., Logan, J.A. and Wofsky, S.C. (1990) A Regional Scale Model for Ozone in the United States with Subgrid Representation of Urban and Power Plant Plumes. Journal of Geophysical Research, 95, 5731-5748.
[30] Ching, J., Dupont, S., Herwehe, J., Otte, S.T., Lacser, A., Byun, D. and Tang, R. (2004) Air Quality Modeling at Coarse-to-Fine-Scales in Urban Areas. Proceedings of the Sixth Conference on Atmospheric Chemistry: Air Quality in Megacities, Seattle, 11-15 January 2004, American Meteorological Society, ATDD Contribution File # 04-16.

Copyright © 2022 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc.

Creative Commons License

This work and the related PDF file are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.