Home > Journals > Social Sciences & Humanities > AD

Spot Reading of the Absolute Paleointensity of the Geomagnetic Field Obtained from Potsherds (Age Ca. 500-430 AD) in Teotihuacan, Mexico

DOI: 10.4236/ad.2015.32008   PDF   HTML   XML   3,528 Downloads   3,977 Views   Citations

Abstract

Archaeointensity data have been obtained successfully using the Thellier-Coe protocol from twelve potsherds recovered from the vicinity of the “Piramide del Sol”, Teotihuacan, Mexico. In order to understand the magnetic behavior of the samples, we have conducted low-field versus temperature (k-T) experiments to determine the magnetic carriers of the pre-Columbian artefacts, as well as Saturation Isothermal Remanent Magnetization (SIRM), hysteresis loops and back-fields TESTS. The Curie temperatures indicate the presence of at least three magnetic mineral phases (238°C - 276°C, 569°C - 592°C, and 609°C - 624°C). The predominant Curie temperatures for these samples are typical of Ti-poor magnetite. The results of the magnetic grain size analyses indicate that if the magnetic mineral in a sample is only magnetite, the distribution on the modified Day et al. (1977) diagram yields specimens in the Single (SD), Pseudo (PSD) and Superparamagnetic (SP) domain ranges. The successfully absolute paleointensity determinations in this study using the Thellier-Coe protocol have yielded an average paleointensity of 38.871 +/- 1.833 m-Teslas (N = 12), and a virtual geomagnetic dipole moment of 8.682 +/- 0.402 × 1022 A/m2 which is slightly lower than the present field strength and which corresponds to an age interval between 500 and 430 AD. Thus, our results correlate well with the recently published CALS3K.4 curve and the incipient archaeointensity reference curve for the Mesoamerican paleo-field results. Therefore, the age of the artefacts would correlate well with absolute the early classic Teotihuacan cultural period.

Share and Cite:

Herrero-Bervera, E. (2015) Spot Reading of the Absolute Paleointensity of the Geomagnetic Field Obtained from Potsherds (Age Ca. 500-430 AD) in Teotihuacan, Mexico. Archaeological Discovery, 3, 72-84. doi: 10.4236/ad.2015.32008.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

[1] Aguilar Reyes, B., Goguitchaichvili, A., Morales, J., Gardun~o, V. H., Pineda, M., Carvallo, C., Moran, T. G., Israde, I., & Rathert, M. C. (2013). An Integrated Archeomagnetic and C14 Study on Pre-Columbian Potsherds and Associated Charcoals Intercalated between Holocene Lacustrine Sediments in Western Mexico: Geomagnetic Implications. Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth, 118, 2753-2763.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jgrb.50196
[2] Aitken, M. J. (1990). Science-Based Dating in Archaeology (pp. 225-229). Longman Archaeology Series, London and New York: Longman.
[3] Aitken, M. J., Allsop, A. L., Bussell, G. D., & Winter, M. B. (1988). Determination of the Intensity of the Earth’s Magnetic during Archaeological Times: Reliability of the Thellier Technique. Reviews of Geophysics, 26, 3-12.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/RG026i001p00003
[4] Alva-Valdivia, L. M., Morales, J., Goguitchaichvili, A., Popenoe de Hatch, M., Hernandez-Bernal, M. S., & Mariano-Matias, F. (2010). Absolute Geomagnetic Intensity Data from Preclassic Guatemalan Pottery. Physics of the Earth and Planetary Interiors, 180, 41-51.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pepi.2010.03.002
[5] Chauvin, A., Garcia, Y., Lanos, Ph., & Laubenheimer, F. (2000). Paleointensity of the Geomagnetic Field Recovered on Archaeomagnetic Sites from France. Physics of the Earth and Planetary Interiors, 120, 111-136.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0031-9201(00)00148-5
[6] Coe, R. S. (1967). Paleo-Intensities of the Earth’s Magnetic Field Determined from Tertiary and Quaternary Rocks. Journal of Geophysical Research, 72, 3247-3262.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/JZ072i012p03247
[7] Coe, R. S., Gromme, S., & Mankinen, E.A. (1978). Geomagnetic Paleointensities from Radiocarbon-Dated Lava Flows on Hawaii and the Question of the Pacific Nondipole Low. Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth, 83, 1740-1756.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/JB083iB04p01740
[8] Day, R., Fuller, M., & Schmidt, V. A. (1977). Hysteresis Properties of Titanomagnetites: Grain Size and Composition Dependence. Physics of the Earth and Planetary Interiors, 13, 260-267.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0031-9201(77)90108-X
[9] Donadini, F., Korte, M., & Constable, C. G. (2009). Geomagnetic Field for 0 - 3 ka: 1. New Data Sets for Global Modeling. Geochemistry, Geophysics, Geosystems, 10, pp.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2008GC002295
[10] Dunlop, D. J. (2002). Theory and Application of the Day Plot (Mrs/Ms versus Hcr/Hc) 2. Application to Data for Rocks, Sediments and Soils. Journal of Geophysical Research, 107, EPM5-1-EPM5-15.
[11] Dunlop, D. J., & Ozdemir, O. (1997). Rock Magnetism: Fundamentals and Frontiers (573 p.). New York: Cambridge University Press.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511612794
[12] Fanjat, G., Camps, P., Alva Valdivia, L. M., Sougrati, M. T., Cuevas-Garcia, M., & Perrin, M. (2013). First Archeointensity Determinations on Maya Incense Burners from Palenque Temples, Mexico: New Data to Constrain the Mesoamerica Secular Variation Curve. Earth and Planetary Science Letters, 363, 168-180.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.epsl.2012.12.035
[13] Gallet, Y., Genevey, A., Le Goff, M., Warme, N., Gran-Amorich, J., & Lefevre, A. (2009). On the Use of Archeology in Geomagnetism, and Vice-Versa: Recent Developments in Archeomagnetism. Comptes Rendus Physique, 10, 630-648.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.crhy.2009.08.005
[14] Genevey, A. S., Gallet, Y., & Margueron, J. C. (2003). Eight Thousand Years of Geomagnetic Field Intensity Variations in the Eastern Mediterranean. Journal of Geophysical Research, 108, NIL20-NIL37.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2001JB001612
[15] Genevey, A., & Gallet, Y. (2002). Intensity of the Geomagnetic Field in Western Europe over the Past 2000 Years: New Data from Ancient French Pottery. Journal of Geophysical Research, 107, EPM1-1-EPM1-18.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2001JB000701
[16] Genevey, A., Gallet, Y., Constable, C. G., Korte, M., & Hulot, G. (2008). ArcheoInt: An Upgraded Compilation of Geomagnetic Field Intensity Data for the Past Ten Millennia and Its Application to the Recovery of the Past Dipole Moment. Geochemistry, Geophysics, Geosystems, 9, Q04038.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2007GC001881
[17] Herrero-Bervera, E., & Acton, G. (2011). Absolute Paleointensities from an Intact Section of Oceanic Crust Cored at ODP/IODP Site 1256 in the Equatorial Pacific. In E. Petrovsky, D. Ivers, T. Harinarayana, & E. Herrero-Bervera (Eds.), The Earth’s Magnetic Interior, IAGA Special Sopron Book Series 1 (pp. 181-193). Berlin: Springer Science + Business Media B.V.
[18] Herrero-Bervera, E., & Valet, J. P. (2009). Testing Determinations of Absolute Paleointensity from the 1955 and 1960 Hawaiian Flows. Earth and Planetary Science Letters, 287, 420-433.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.epsl.2009.08.035
[19] Herrero-Bervera, E., &Valet, J. P. (2005). Absolute Paleointensity and Reversal Records from the Waianae Sequence (Oahu, Hawaii, USA). Earth and Planetary Science Letters, 234, 279-296.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.epsl.2005.02.032
[20] Hrouda, F. (1994). A Technique for the Measurement of Thermal Changes of Magnetic Susceptibility of Weakly Magnetic Rocks by the CS-2 Apparatus and KLY-2 Kappabridge. Geophysical Journal International, 118, 604-612.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-246X.1994.tb03987.x
[21] Hrouda, F., Jelinek, V., & Zapletal, K. (1997). Refined Technique for Susceptibility Resolution into Ferromagnetic and Paramagnetic Components Based on Susceptibility Temperature Variation Measurements. Geophysical Journal International, 129, 715-719.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-246X.1997.tb04506.x
[22] Korhonen, K., Donadini, F., Riisager, P., & Pesonen, L. (2008). GEOMAGIA50: An Archeointensity Database with PHP and MySQL. Geochemistry, Geophysics, Geosystems, 9, 893.
[23] Korte, M., & Constable, C. G. (2011). Improving Geomagnetic Field Reconstructions for 0 - 3 ka. Physics of the Earth and Planetary Interiors, 188, 247-259.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pepi.2011.06.017
[24] Korte, M., Constable, C. G., Donadini, F., & Holme, R. (2011). Reconstructing the Holocene Geomagnetic Field. Earth and Planetary Science Letters, 312, 497-505.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.epsl.2011.10.031
[25] Perrin, M., Schnepp, E., & Shcherbakov, V. (1998). Paleointensity Database Updated. Eos, Transactions American Geophysical Union, 79, 198.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/98EO00145
[26] Selkin, P., & Tauxe, L. (2000). Long-Term Variations in Paleointensity. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A, 358, 1065-1088.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2000.0574
[27] Shaw, J., Yang, S., & Wei, Q. Y. (1995). Archaeointensity Variations for the Past 7,500 Years Evaluated from Ancient Chinese Ceramics. Journal of Geomagnetism and Geoelectricity, 47, 59-70.
http://dx.doi.org/10.5636/jgg.47.59
[28] Stark, F., Leonhardt, R., Fassbibder, J. W. E., & Reindel, M. (2009). The Field of Sherds: Reconstructing Geomagnetic Field Variations from Peruvian Potsherds. In M. Reindel, & G. A. Wagner (Eds.), New Technologies for Archaeology, Natural Science in Archaeology (pp. 103-116). Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
[29] Tema, E., Gomez-Pacard, M., Kondopoulou, D., & Almar, Y. (2012). Intensity of the Earth’s Magnetic Field in Greece during the Last Five Millennia: New Data from Greek Pottery. Physics of the Earth and Planetary Interiors, 202-203, 14-26.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pepi.2012.01.012
[30] Valet, J. P., Herrero-Bervera, E., Carlut, J., & Kondopoulou, D. (2010). A Selective Procedure for Absolute Paleointensity in Lava Flows. Geophysical Research Letters, 37, L16308.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2010GL044100
[31] Valet, J. P., Herrero-Bervera, E., LeMouel, J. L., & Plenier, G. (2008). Secular Variation of the Geomagnetic Dipole during the Past 2000 Years. Geochemistry, Geophysics, Geosystems, 9, Q01008.
[32] Zhu, R., Pan, Y., Shaw, J., Li, D., & Li, Q. (2001). Geomagnetic Palaeointensity just Prior to the Cretaceous Normal Superchron. Physics of the Earth and Planetary Interiors, 128, 207-222.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0031-9201(01)00287-4

  
comments powered by Disqus
AD Subscription
E-Mail Alert
AD Most popular papers
Publication Ethics & OA Statement
AD News
Frequently Asked Questions
Recommend to Peers
Recommend to Library
Contact Us

Copyright © 2020 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc.

Creative Commons License

This work and the related PDF file are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.