Comparison of the Modified Eversion Carotid Endarterectomy Technique with the Conventional Carotid Endarterectomy Technique: Early Results


Objectives: In this study, we aimed to compare early results of the modified eversion carotid endarterectomy technique with the conventional carotid endarterectomy technique. The modified eversion carotid endarterectomy technique consisted of a longitudinal arteriotomy that was begun from the common carotid artery proximally to the origin of external carotid artery. We also avoided applying a carotid shunt during surgery in both techniques. Methods: Each patient was evaluated for coronary artery stenosis and valve replacement indications. Diagnosis of significant coronary artery stenosis or valve disease directed us to a combination of CEA and cardiac surgery (CABG/Valvular). We generally had a tendency to perform these two surgical procedures separately. Patients which had surgery for both at the same session were excluded in this study. As a result, our study included 120 patients and 137 carotid interventions. We performed the modified eversion carotid endarterectomy technique in 61 patients (68 carotid interventions) (Group A) and the conventional CEA technique in 59 patients (69 carotid interventions) (Group B). At follow-up, the patients were evaluated by physical examination and color Doppler USG. Results: There was no significant difference between the groups in terms of demographic data. Statistically significant difference was observed in one operative parameter between Group A and Group B; patchplasty requirements during surgery (12 carotid interventions in group B and 4 carotid interventions in group A, p = 0.036). We recorded temporary tongue deviation in five cases, facial asymmetry in eight cases, hoarseness in four cases, neurocognitive impairment in three cases and transient neurologic in two cases with no significant difference between the groups. There was in one case of permanent neurologic deficit (1 in group B). There were two postoperative deaths (1 in group A and 1 in group B). The death in group A occurred because of subarachnoid haemorrhage and the death in group B occurred because of myocardial infarction. After 6 month follow-up, no restenosis occurred in group A. Restenosis occurred in three patients of group B. Conclusion: The modified eversion technique for carotid endarterectomy decrease the incidence of patchplasty applications and postoperative restenosis by avoiding internal carotid artery manipulation and sewing. Besides, it is easy and possible to remove plaques completely from internal carotid artery via the modified arteriotomy line.

Share and Cite:

Abud, B. , Talay, S. , Ünal, C. , Kubat, E. , Karaarslan, K. and Turhan, S. (2015) Comparison of the Modified Eversion Carotid Endarterectomy Technique with the Conventional Carotid Endarterectomy Technique: Early Results. World Journal of Cardiovascular Diseases, 5, 87-94. doi: 10.4236/wjcd.2015.54012.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.


[1] Eastcott, H.H., Pickering, G.W. and Rob, C.G. (1954) Reconstruction of Internal Carotid Artery in a Patient with Intermittent Attacks of Hemiplegia. Lancet, 264, 994-996.
[2] Barnett, H., Taylor, W., Eliasziw, M., Fox, A.J., Ferguson, G.G., Haynes, R.B., et al. (1998) Benefit of Carotid Endarterectomy in Patients with Symptomatic Moderate or Severe Stenosis. North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial Collaborators. The New England Journal of Medicine, 339, 1415-1425.
[3] Walker, M.D., Marler, J.R., Goldstein, M., Grady, P.A., Toole, J.F., Baker, W.H., et al. (1995) Executive Committee for the Asymptomatic Carotid Atherosclerosis Study. Endarterectomy for Asymptomatic Carotid Stenosis. The Journal of the American Medical Association, 273, 1421-1428.
[4] Halliday, A., Mansfield, A., Marro, J., Peto, C., Peto, R., Potter, J., et al. (2004) MRC Asymptomatic Carotid Surgery Trial (ACST) Collaborative Group. Prevention of Disabling and Fatal Strokes by Successful Carotid Endarterectomy in Patients without Recent Neurological Symptoms; Randomized Controlled Trial. Lancet, 363, 1491-1502.
[5] Ott, D.A., Cooley, D.A., Chapa, L. and Coelho, A. (1980) Carotid Endarterectomy without Temporary Intraluminal Shunt. Study of 309 Consecutive Operations. Annals of Surgery, 191, 708-713.
[6] James, A.L., Carl, E. and Jeffry, P.E. (1985) Vertebrobasilar Insufficiency. Archives of Neurology, 42, 803-808.
[7] DeBakey, M.E. (1975) Successful Carotid Endarterectomy for Cerebrovascular Insufficiency. The Journal of the American Medical Association, 233, 1083-1085.
[8] Khiatan, L., Sutter, F.P. and Goldman, S.M. (2000) Simultaneous Carotid Endarterectomy and Coronary Revascularization. The Annals of Thoracic Surgery, 69, 421-424.
[9] Palombo, D., Lucertini, G., Mambrini, S. and Zettin, M. (2007) Subtle Cerebral Damage after Shunting vs Nonshunting during Carotid Endarterectomy. European Journal of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, 34, 546-551.
[10] Stewart, G., Ross-Russell, R.W. and Browse, N.L. (1986) The Long-Term Results of Carotid Endarterectomy for Transient Ischemic Attacks. Journal of Vascular Surgery, 4, 600-605.
[11] Rubin, J.R., Goldstone, J., McIntyre Jr., K.E., Malone, J.M. and Bernhard, V.M. (1986) The Value of Carotid Endarterectomy in Reducing the Morbidity and Mortality of Recurrent Stroke. Journal of Vascular Surgery, 4, 443-449.
[12] Boontje, A.H. (1994) Carotid Endarterectomy without a Temporary Indwelling Shunt: Results and Analysis of Back Pressure Measurements. Cardiovascular Surgery, 2, 549-554.
[13] Samson, R.H., Showalter, D.P. and Yunis, J.P. (1998) Routine Carotid Endarterectomy without a Shunt, Even in the Presence of a Contralateral Occlusion. Cardiovascular Surgery, 6, 475-484.
[14] Hertzer, N.R., Beven, E.G., O’Hara, P.J. and Krajewski, L.P. (1987) A Prospective Study of Vein Patch Angioplasty during Carotid Endarterectomy: Three-Year Results for 801 Patients and 917 Operations. Annals of Surgery, 208, 628-635.
[15] Mackey, W.C., Khabbaz, K. and Bojar, R. (1996) Simultaneous Carotid Endarterectomy and Coronary Artery Bypass: Perioperative Risk and Long Term Survival. Journal of Vascular Surgery, 24, 58-64.
[16] Loftus, C.M. (2007) Historical Perspective on Carotid Reconstruction. Carotid Endarterectomy Principles and Technique. 2nd Edition, Informa Healthcare, New York, 1-46.
[17] Rockman, C.B., Halm, E.A., Wang, J.J., Chassin, M.R., Tuhrim, S., Formisano, P. and Riles, T.S. (2005) Primary Closure of the Carotid Artery Is Associated with Poorer Outcomes during Carotid Endarterectomy. Journal of Vascular Surgery, 42, 870-877.
[18] Rizzo, A., Hertzer, N., O’Hara, P., Krajewski, L. and Beven, E. (2000) Dacron Carotid Patch Infection: A Report of Eight Cases. Journal of Vascular Surgery, 32, 602-606.
[19] Kieny, R., Hirsch, D., Seiller, C., Thiranos, J.C. and Petit, H. (1993) Does Carotid Eversion Endarterectomy and Reimplantation Reduce the Risk of Restenosis? Annals of Vascular Surgery, 7, 407-413.
[20] Bosse, A., Ansorg, P., Mayer, B. and Mulch, J. (1991) Eversion Endarteriectomy of the Enternal Carotid Artery. The Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgeon, 39, 371-375.
[21] Katras, T., Baltazar, U., Rush, D.S., Sutterfield, W.C., Harvill, L.M. and Stanton Jr., P.E. (2001) Durability of Eversion Carotid Endarterectomy: Comparison with Primary Closure and Carotid Patch Angioplasty. Journal of Vascular Surgery, 34, 453-458.
[22] Bernhard, V.M., Johnson, W.D. and Peterson, J.J. (1972) Carotid Artery Stenosis. Archives of Surgery, 105, 837-840.
[23] Imparato, A.M., Riles, T.S. and Gorstein, F. (1979) The Carotid Bifurcation Plaque: Pathologic Findings Associated with Cerebral Ischemia. Stroke, 10, 238-245.

Copyright © 2023 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc.

Creative Commons License

This work and the related PDF file are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.