Multi-Criteria Assessment of Biofuel Production in Small Islands


This paper discusses various policy alternatives for the implementation of a biofuel crop on an island scale. It adopts an integrated approach by carrying out Multi-Criteria Assessment, as well as using a Geographical Information System. The assessment is based on an interdisciplinary research project carried out by the University of La Laguna to evaluate the agricultural and chemical feasibility, and the socio-economic implications of the cultivation of Jatropha as a source of biofuel on one of the Canary Islands, Fuerteventura. A number of alternatives were analysed for growing Jatropha, and the results suggest that the best alternative involves using Typic Torrifluents soil and irrigation with reclaimed Recycled Urban Wastewater at 75% evapotranspiration cover.

Share and Cite:

Nuez, D. , Corral-Quintana, S. and de Lara, D. (2015) Multi-Criteria Assessment of Biofuel Production in Small Islands. Natural Resources, 6, 230-236. doi: 10.4236/nr.2015.64021.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.


[1] Gobierno de Canarias (2000) Estadísticas de producciones de los parques eólicos de Canarias desde el a?o 1998. Gobierno de Canarias.
[2] PECAN (2007) Plan Energético de Canarias. Gobierno de Canarias.
[3] European Union (2009) Promotion of the Use of Energy from Renewable Sources. 2009/208/EC: Official Journal of the European Union.
[4] EC (2006) Estrategia de la UE para los biocarburantes. European Commission, Bruselas.
[5] Funtowicz, S.O. and Ravetz, J.R. (1993) Science for the Post-Normal Age. Futures, 25, 739-755.
[6] Corral Quintana, S. (2009) A Quality Assurance Framework for Policy-Making: Proposing a Quality Assurance Assistant Tool (QAAT). Science for Policy, New Challenges, New Opportunities, O.U. Press.
[7] Lindblom, C.E. (1991) El proceso de elaboración de políticas públicas. Ministerio para las Administraciones Públicas, Madrid.
[8] Dinse, K., Lund, K. and Scavia, D. (2010) Benefits of Integrated Assessment: Information for Decision Makers, Project Leaders and Scientists. Michigan Sea Grant y Graham Environmental Sustainability Institute, Ann Arbor.
[9] IDAE (2011) Plan de Energías Renovables 2011-2020. Instituto para la Diversificación y Ahorro de la Energía.
[10] Veigas, M. and Iglesias, G. (2013) Wave and Offshore Wind Potential for the Island of Tenerife. Energy Conversion and Management, 76, 738-745.
[11] Méndez Ramos, J. (2013) Turning into the Blue: Materials for Enhancing TiO2 Photocatalysis by Up-Conversion Photonics. RSC Advances, 3, 23028-23034.
[12] Bueno, C. and Carta, J.A. (2006) Wind Powered Pumped Hydro Storage Systems, a Means of Increasing the Penetration of Renewable Energy in the Canary Islands. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 10, 312-340.?
[13] Calero, R. and Carta, J.A. (2004) Action Plan for Wind Energy Development in the Canary Islands. Energy Policy, 32, 1185-1197.
[14] Díaz, F.J., Tejedor, M., Jiménez, C. and Dahlgren, R.A. (2011) Soil Fertility Dynamics in Runoff-Capture Agriculture, Canary Islands, Spain. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 144, 253-261.
[15] Tejedor, M.L., Jiménez Mendoza, C.C., Rivero Ceballos, J.L., Corral Quintana, S. and Verna, C.L. (2010) Programa de Lucha contra la Desertificación en Canarias. Universidad de La Laguna, La Laguna.
[16] de Canarias, G. (2012) Medio Ambiente en Canarias. Informes de Coyuntura-SUELOS. Gobierno de Canarias. Consejería de Medio Ambiente.
[17] Rivero Cebalos, J.L. (2007) Canarias, 1936-2000. El modelo económico reciente. Economía e Insularidad, (siglos XIV-XX), Universidad de La Laguna, La Laguna, 53-86.
[18] Achten, W.M.J., Verchot, L., Franken, Y.J., Mathijs, E., Singh, V.P., Aerts, R., et al. (2008) Jatropha Bio-Diesel Production and Use. Biomass and Bioenergy, 32, 1063-1084.
[19] Francis, G., Edinger, R. and Becker, K. (2005) A Concept for Simultaneous Wasteland Reclamation, Fuel Production, and Socio-Economic Development in Degraded Areas in India: Need, Potential and Perspectives of Jatropha Plantations. Natural Resources Forum, 29, 12-24.
[20] Kumar, A. and Sharma, S. (2008) An Evaluation of Multipurpose Oil Seed Crop for Industrial Uses (Jatropha curcas L.): A Review. Industrial Crops and Products, 28, 1-10.
[21] Pandey, V.C., Singh, K., Singh, J.S., Kumar, A., Singh, B. and Singh, R.P. (2012) Jatropha curcas: A Potential Biofuel Plant for Sustainable Environmental Development. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 16, 2870-2883.
[22] Carriquiry, M.A., Du, X. and Timilsina, G.R. (2011) Second Generation Biofuels: Economics and Policies. Energy Policy, 39, 4222-4234.
[23] Dyer, G.A. and Taylor, J.E. (2010) Impacts of the US Ethanol Boom in Rural Mexico. Proceedings of the 84th Annual Conference of Agricultural Economics Society, Edinburgh, 29-31 March 2010, 100-125.
[24] Wise, T.A. (2012) The Cost to Mexico of US Corn Ethanol Expansion. Working Paper No. 12-01, Global Development and Environment Institute.
[25] Ewing, M. and Msangi, S. (2009) Biofuels Production in Developing Countries: Assessing Tradeoffs in Welfare and Food Security. Environmental Science & Policy, 12, 520-528.
[26] Rathmann, R., Szklo, A. and Schaeffer, R. (2010) Land Use Competition for Production of Food and Liquid Biofuels: An Analysis of the Arguments in the Current Debate. Renewable Energy, 35, 14-22.
[27] Demirbas, A. (2009) Political, Economic and Environmental Impacts of Biofuels: A Review. Applied Energy, 86, S108-S117.
[28] Stromberg, P.M., Gasparatos, A., Lee, J.S.H., Garcia-Ulloa, J., Koh, L.P. and Takeuchi, K. (2010) Impacts of Liquid Biofuels on Ecosystem Services and Biodiversity. Institute of Advanced Studies, United Nations University, 51.
[29] Koh, L.P. and Ghazoul, J. (2008) Biofuels, Biodiversity, and People: Understanding the Conflicts and Finding Opportunities. Biological Conservation, 141, 2450-2460.
[30] Fitzherbert, E.B., Struebig, M.J., Morel, A., Danielsen, F., Bruhl, C.A., Donald, P.F., et al. (2008) How Will Oil Palm Expansion Affect Biodiversity? Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 23, 538-545.
[31] Sadhwani, J.J. and Veza, J.M. (2008) Desalination and Energy Consumption in Canary Islands. Desalination, 221, 143-150.
[32] Dorta-Santos, M., Tejedor, M., Jiménez, C., Hernández-Moreno, J., Palacios-Díaz, M. and Díaz, F. (2014) Recycled Urban Wastewater for Irrigation of Jatropha curcas L. in Abandoned Agricultural Arid Land. Sustainability, 6, 6902- 6924.
[33] Munda, G. (2004) Social Multi-Criteria Evaluation: Methodological Foundations and Operational Consequences. European Journal of Operational Research, 158, 662-677.
[34] Corral Quintana, S. and Funtowicz, S.O. (1998) Cómo afrontar la problemática compleja del agua. Ecología Política, 16, 111.
[35] Ananda, J. and Herath, G. (2009) A Critical Review of Multi-Criteria Decision Making Methods with Special Reference to Forest Management and Planning. Ecological Economics, 68, 2535-2548.
[36] Diaz-Balteiro, L. and Romero, C. (2008) Making Forestry Decisions with Multiple Criteria: A Review and an Assessment. Forest Ecology and Management, 255, 3222-3241.
[37] Mendoza, G.A. and Martins, H. (2006) Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis in Natural Resource Management: A Critical Review of Methods and New Modelling Paradigms. Forest Ecology and Management, 230, 1-22.
[38] Mendoza, G.A. and Prabhu, R. (2006) Participatory Modeling and Analysis for Sustainable Forest Management: Overview of Soft System Dynamics Models and Applications. Forest Policy and Economics, 9, 179-196.
[39] Hayati, E., Majnounian, B., Abdi, E., Sessions, J. and Makhdoum, M. (2013) An Expert-Based Approach to Forest Road Network Planning by Combining Delphi and Spatial Multi-Criteria Evaluation. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 185, 1767-1776.
[40] Sheppard, S.R.J. and Meitner, M. (2005) Using Multi-Criteria Analysis and Visualization for Sustainable Forest Management Planning with Stakeholder Groups. Forest Ecology and Management, 207, 171-187.
[41] Buchy, M. and Hoverman, S. (2000) Understanding Public Participation in Forest Planning: A Review. Forest Policy and Economics, 1, 15-25.
[42] Kangas, A., Laukkanen, S. and Kangas, J. (2006) Social Choice Theory and Its Applications in Sustainable Forest Management—A Review. Forest Policy and Economics, 9, 77-92.
[43] Kangas, A.S., Kangas, J., Lahdelma, R. and Salminen, P. (2006) Using SMAA-2 Method with Dependent Uncertainties for Strategic Forest Planning. Forest Policy and Economics, 9, 113-125.
[44] Kangas, J. and Kangas, A. (2005) Multiple Criteria Decision Support in Forest Management—The Approach, Methods Applied, and Experiences Gained. Forest Ecology and Management, 207, 133-143.
[45] Nordstrom, E.-M., Eriksson, L.O. and Ohman, K. (2010) Integrating Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis in Participatory Forest Planning: Experience from a Case Study in Northern Sweden. Forest Policy and Economics, 12, 562-574.
[46] Niemel?, J., Young, J., Alard, D., Askasibar, M., Henle, K., Johnson, R., et al. (2005) Identifying, Managing and Monitoring Conflicts between Forest Biodiversity Conservation and Other Human Interests in Europe. Forest Policy and Economics, 7, 877-890.
[47] Vainikainen, N., Kangas, A. and Kangas, J. (2008) Empirical Study on Voting Power in Participatory Forest Planning. Journal of Environmental Management, 88, 173-180.
[48] Kangas, A., Heikkila, J., Malmivaara-Lamsa, M. and Lofstrom, I. (2014) Case Puijo—Evaluation of a Participatory Urban Forest Planning Process. Forest Policy and Economics, 45, 13-23.
[49] Saarikoski, H., Tikkanen, J. and Leskinen, L.A. (2010) Public Participation in Practice—Assessing Public Participation in the Preparation of Regional Forest Programs in Northern Finland. Forest Policy and Economics, 12, 349-356.
[50] Funtowicz, S. and Strand, R. (2007) De la demostracion experta al diálogo participativo. Revista Iberoamericana de Ciencia, Tecnología y Sociedad, 3, 97-113.
[51] Marchi, B.D., Funtowicz, S.O., Cascio, S.L. and Munda, G. (2000) Combining Participative and Institutional Approaches with?Multicriteria Evaluation. An Empirical Study for Water Issues?in Troina, Sicily. Ecological Economics, 34, 267-282.
[52] Corral Quintana, S. and Funtowicz, S. (1998) Cómo Afrontar La Problemática Compleja Del Agua. Congreso Ibérico sobre gestión y planificación del agua—Gestión de Aguas, Participación y Conflictos Sociales y Políticos, Zaragoza.
[53] Corral Quintana, S. (2004) Una metodología integrada de exploración y compresión de los procesos de elaboración de políticas públicas. Departamento de Economía de las Instituciones, Estadística Económica y Econometría, Universidad de La Laguna, La Laguna.
[54] Paneque Salgado, P., Corral Quintana, S., Guimaraes Pereira, A., del Moral Ituarte, L. and Pedregal Mateos, B. (2009) Participative Multi-Criteria Analysis for the Evaluation of Water Governance Alternatives. A Case in the Costa del Sol (Málaga). Ecological Economics, 68, 990-1005.
[55] Munda, G. (1995) NAIADE Method: A Short Description. UAB, Barcelona.
[56] JRC (1996) NAIADE Manual and Tutorial—Version 1.0.ENG. Joint Research Centre, Ispra Site.
[57] Pereira, ?.G. and Quintana, S.C. (2002) From Technocratic to Participatory Decision Support Systems: Responding to the New Governance Initiatives. Journal of Geographic Information and Decision Analysis, 6, 95-107.
[58] Munda, G., Nijkamp, P. and Rietveld, P. (1995) Qualitative Multicriteria Methods for Fuzzy Evaluation Problems: An Illustration of Economic-Ecological Evaluation. European Journal of Operational Research, 82, 79-97.
[59] Neudoerffer, R.C., Malhotra, P. and Ramana, P.V. (2001) Participatory Rural Energy Planning in India—A Policy Context. Energy Policy, 29, 371-381.

Copyright © 2023 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc.

Creative Commons License

This work and the related PDF file are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.