A Comparison between Three-Dimensional Conformal Radiotherapy, Intensity-Modulated Radiotherapy, and Volumetric-Modulated Arc Therapy Techniques for Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy of Lung Tumors

Ganesh Narayanasamy, Drew Granatowicz, Diana Baacke, Ying Li, Alonso Gutierrez, Niko Papanikolaou, Sotirios Stathakis

Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, USA.

DOI: 10.4236/ijmpcero.2015.42014                

Abstract

Introduction: The aim of this study is to dosimetrically compare 3D CRT, IMRT, and VMAT techniques that employ coplanar and non-coplanar beams for the SBRT of lung tumors. Methods and Materials: Nine (n = 9) consecutive SBRT lung patients with ten tumor sites who were previously treated at our institution were selected for this study. Six (n = 6) treatment plans were created for each PTV: 1 coplanar and 1 non-coplanar 3D CRT, IMRT, and VMAT such that 98% of PTV received 100% of prescription dose, Rx of 50 Gy in 5 fractions. The data collected from each plan included the conformity index, R50%, and homogeneity index of the target as well as the volume of normal tissue irradiated by 5 Gy, 25 Gy isodose lines, V5 and V20 of total lung, and maximum dose to organs at risk. Beam angles and arc lengths were chosen in order to achieve the lowest total lung V5, V20 and R50% values. Results: According to the observed data, the mean total lung V5 and V20 values were lowest for the non-coplanar VMAT plans, but were not statistically different from the other planning techniques. Conformity values were similar for the IMRT and VMAT plans, and significantly lower than the 3D CRT plans. R50% values were lowest for the VMAT plans and significantly lower than both IMRT and 3D CRT plans in both coplanar and non-coplanar beam arrangements. However, dose homogeneity in the PTV is significantly higher in the IMRT coplanar plans than the corresponding 3D CRT and SmartArc (SA) coplanar plans. Coplanar VMAT plans were able to produce a significant 35.5% reduction in the maximum cord dose than coplanar 3D CRT plans (p-value < 0.03). VMAT plans also reduce the volume of the normal tissue irradiated to high doses, but the reduction is insignificant. Conclusion: Overall, the VMAT plans were able to produce highly conformal plans. No single planning technique can outclass the others in all of the SBRT planning indices significantly and a thorough review of each patient plan is needed.

Keywords

Lung SBRT, VMAT, Conformity Index, Homogeneity Index

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

[1]	Jemal, A., Siegel, R., Xu, J. and Ward, E. (2010) Cancer Statistics. CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians, 60, 277-300. http://dx.doi.org/10.3322/caac.20073
[2]	Videtic, G., Stephans, K., Reddy, C., Gajdos, S., Kolar, M., Clouser, E. and Djemil, T. (2010) Intensity-Modulated Radiotherapy-Based Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy for Medically Inoperable Early-Stage Lung Cancer: Excellent Local Control. International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology* Physics, 77, 344-349. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2009.05.004
[3]	Ong, C., Verbakel, W., Cuijpers, J., Slotman, B.J., Lanerwaard, F.J. and Senan, S. (2010) Stereotactic Radiotherapy for Peripheral Lung Tumors: A Comparison of Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy with 3 Other Delivery Techniques. Radiotherapy & Oncology, 97, 437-442. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.radonc.2010.09.027
[4]	Benedict, S.H., Yenice, K.M., Followill, D., Galvin, J.M., Hinson, W., Kavanagh, B., et al. (2010) Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy. The Report of the AAPM Task Group 101. Medical Physics, 37, 4078-4101. http://dx.doi.org/10.1118/1.3438081
[5]	Verbakel, W., Senan, S., Cujipers, J., Slotman, B.J. and Lagerwaard, F.J. (2009) Rapid Delivery of Stereotactic Radiotherapy for Peripheral Lung Tumors Using Volumetric Intensity-Modulated Arcs. Radiotherapy & Oncology, 93, 122-124. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.radonc.2009.05.020
[6]	Brock, J., Bedford, J., Partridge, M., McDonald, F., Ashley, S., McNair, H.A., et al. (2012) Optimizing Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy for Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer with Volumetric Intensity-Modulated Arc Therapy—A Planning Study. Clinical Oncology, 24, 68-75. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.clon.2011.02.003
[7]	Holt, A., van Vliet-Vroegindeweij, C., Mans, A., Belderbos, J. and Damen, E.M. (2011) Volumetric-Modulated Arc Therapy for Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy of Lung Tumors: A Comparison with Intensity-Modulated Radiotherapy Techniques. International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology* Physics, 81, 1560-1567. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2010.09.014
[8]	Weyh, A., Konski, A., Nalichowski, A., Maier, J. and Lack, D. (2013) Lung SBRT: Dosimetric and Delivery Comparison of Rapid Arc, Tomo Therapy, and IMRT. Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics, 14, 3-13.
[9]	International Commission on Radiation Units and Measurements (1999) Prescribing, Recording and Reporting Photon Beam Therapy. ICRU Report 62. ICRU Publications, Bethesda.
[10]	Bree, I.D., van Hinsberg, M.G. and van Veelen, L.R. (2012) High-Dose Radiotherapy in Inoperable Nonsmall Cell Lung Cancer: Comparison of Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy, Dynamic IMRT and 3D Conformal Radiotherapy. Medical Dosimetry, 37, 353-357. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.meddos.2011.12.002
[11]	Cai, J., Malhotra, H.K. and Orton, C.G. (2014) A 3D Conformal Technique Is Better than IMRT or VMAT for Lung SBRT. Medical Physics, 41, Article ID: 040601. http://dx.doi.org/10.1118/1.4856175
[12]	Wu, V.W., Kwong, D.L. and Sham, J.S. (2004) Target Dose Conformity in 3-Dimensional Conformal Radiotherapy and Intensity Modulated Radiotherapy. Radiotherapy & Oncology, 71, 201-206. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.radonc.2004.03.004
[13]	Lee, T., Chao, P., Ting, H., Lo, S., Wang, Y., Tuan, C., Fang, F. and Su, T. (2011) Comparative Analysis of Smart Arc-Based Dual Arc Volumetric-Modulated Arc Radiotherapy (VMAT) versus Intensity-Modulated Radiotherapy (IMRT) for Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma. Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics, 12, 158-174.
[14]	Wu, Q.J., Yoo, S., Kirkpatrick, J.P., Thongphiew, D. and Yin, F.-F. (2009)Volumetric Arc Intensity-Modulated Therapy for Spine Body Radiotherapy: Comparison with Static Intensity-Modulated Treatment. International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology* Physics, 75, 1596-1604. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2009.05.005
[15]	Schuring, D. and Hurkmans, C.W. (2008) Developing and Evaluating Stereotactic Lung RT Trials: What We Know about the Influence of Inhomogeneity Corrections on Dose. Radiotherapy & Oncology, 3, 21. http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1748-717X-3-21
[16]	Oyewale, S. (2013) Dose Prediction Accuracy of Collapsed Cone Convolution Superposition Algorithm in a Multi-Layer Inhomogenous Phantom. International Journal of Cancer Therapy and Oncology, 1, Article ID: 01016. http://dx.doi.org/10.14319/ijcto.0101.6
[17]	Stathakis, S., Esquivel, C., Quino, L., Myers, P., Calvo, O., Mavroidis, P., Gutiérrez, A. and Papanikolaou, N. (2012) Accuracy of the Small Field Dosimetry Using the Acuros XB Dose Calculation Algorithm within and beyond Heterogeneous Media for 6 MV Photon Beams. International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology* Physics, 1, 78-87. http://dx.doi.org/10.4236/ijmpcero.2012.13011
[18]	Calvo, O.I., Gutiérrez, A.N., Stathakis, S., Esquivel, C. and Papanikolaou, N. (2012) On the Quantification of the Dosimetric Accuracy of Collapsed Cone Convolution Superposition (CCCS) Algorithm for Small Lung Volumes Using IMRT. Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics, 13, 43-59.