Analysis of Instantaneous and Continuous Migration of Radionuclides from Disposal Facility

DOI: 10.4236/ojsst.2011.11001   PDF   HTML     5,844 Downloads   10,207 Views   Citations


Many disposal sites have been suffered from radionuclide release problems, which lead to land contamination. Various remediation procedures have been developed during the past decade. Selection of remediation techniques is dependant mainly on quantity and quality of radioactive contamination. For that reason, the understanding of the factors that control the degree of contamination of any land should be the start of this problem. The present work aimed to construct the base of a new mandatory chapter in the safety analysis report that discuss and predict quantatively and qualitively the possible release from disposal site. The objective of this chapter is to prevent, restrict, and/or remediate economically the contamination that can be occurred. In the present work, a generic disposal system was evaluated. The radio-elements, which can contaminate the area before their decays, are determined by a screening process. Knowing that the mode of radionuclide migration from a disposal site is one from the important factors that control the contamination problem; migration activity of the selected radionuclides is assessed by considering instantaneous and continuous modes release of radionuclides from the disposal site. Finally, the elementary analysis steps demonstrated in this study will be concluded as the proposed items in the new chapter.

Share and Cite:

N. Mahmoud, "Analysis of Instantaneous and Continuous Migration of Radionuclides from Disposal Facility," Open Journal of Safety Science and Technology, Vol. 1 No. 1, 2011, pp. 1-11. doi: 10.4236/ojsst.2011.11001.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.


[1] International Atomic Energy Agency, “Preparation of Safety Analysis Reports (SARs) for Near Surface Radioactive Waste Disposal Facilities”, IAEA, Vienna, TECDOC-No 789, 1995.
[2] International Atomic Energy Agency, “Derivation of activity limits for the disposal of radioactive waste in near surface disposal facilities”, IAEA-TECDOC-1380, December 2003.
[3] Holdren, K. Jean and Barbara J. Broomfield, Second Revision to the Scope of Work for the Operable Unit 7-13/14 Waste Area Group 7 Comprehensive Remedial Investigation/Feasibility Study, INEL-95/0253, Rev. 2, Idaho National Engineering and Environmental Laboratory, 2003
[4] Masahiro Munakata, Hideo Kimura and Hideo Matsuzuru, JAERI-Research, “Source Term and Analysis for Vault/Trench Facilities Located in an Unsaturated Zone”, Japan Atomic Energy Research Institute, June 1995.
[5] N. S. Mahmoud, S. El Hemamy, “On the possible Leakage of ET-RR1 Liquid Waste Tank; Hydrological and Migration Modes Studies, ScientificWorldJournal (2005) 5, p. 234-252, ISSN 1537-744X; DOI 10.1100/tsw.(2005).34
[6] International Commission on Radiological Protection, “Limits for Intakes of Radionuclides by Workers”, ICRP publication 30. Ann.ICRP , Pergamon Press, Oxford, 1979-1983.
[7] P. A. Domenico, G. A. Robbins, “A New Method of Contaminant Plume Analysis’, Groundwater, Vol. 23, 1985.
[8] Paterick A. Domenico, Franklin W. Schwartz, “Physical and Chemical Hydrology”, Text Book, John Willey & Sons, Copyright 1990.
[9] John E. Till, H. Robert Meyer, “Radiological Assessment”, A Text book on Environmental Dose Analysis, GPO Sales Program, USA, Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC, 1983.
[10] Office of Environmental Restoration, “Decision-Making Framework Guide for the Evaluation and Selection of Monitored Natural Attenuation Remedies at Department of Energy Sites”, EM, U.S. Department of Energy, May 13, 1999.
[11] Office of Environmental Restoration, “Technical Guidance for the Long-Term Monitoring of Natural Attenuation Remedies at Department of Energy Sites”, EM, U.S. Department of Energy, October 8, 1999.
[12] Matthew McCormack, “Phytoremediation”, December 3, 2000
[14] Bruce E. Pivetz, “Phytoremediation of Contaminated Soil and Ground Water at Hazardous Waste Sites”, EPA, United States Environmental Protection Agency, Ground Water Issue, EPA/540/S-01/500, February 2001.
[15] National Research Council, “Groundwater & Soil Cleanup, Improving Management of Persistent Contaminants”, Committee on Technologies for Cleanup of Subsurface Contaminants in the DOE Weapons Complex. National Academy Press, Washington, D.C., 1999.
[16] Michel Rahbeh, “Evaluating the Capture Zones of the Pump-Treat Remediation Technique”’ Agricultural and Biological Engineering Department, Purdue University, December 15, 1999.
[17] Zitnik, James F., Aran T. Armstrong, Brian K. Corb, Mark H. Edens, Douglas B. Holsten, Patricia M. O’Flaherty, Janet Rodriguez, Tamara N. Thomas, Russell L. Treat, Wayne Schofield, Kira L. Sykes, 2002, Preliminary Evaluation of Remedial Alternatives for the Subsurface Disposal Area, INEEL/EXT-02-01258, prepared by CH2MHILL for the Idaho National Engineering and Environmental Laboratory, December 2002.

comments powered by Disqus

Copyright © 2020 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc.

Creative Commons License

This work and the related PDF file are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.