Multi-Detector Row Computed Tomography Urography (MDCTU) in the Evaluation of Microscopic Hematuria in Adults

Abstract

Multi-detector row computed tomography urography (MDCTU) becomes the imaging modality of choice for evaluation of the kidneys and urinary tract. The aim of this study was to discuss and illustrate the role of MDCTU, on a 32-row CT scanner in the evaluation a variety of entities that were frequently associated with microscopic hematuria in adults. This prospective cohort study was performed in the period of August 2013 to October 2014. Fifty positive participants to microscopic hematuria were examined at the radiology department of Alnilin Diagnostic Medical Center and Antalya Medical Center. Computed tomography urography (CTU) scanning was performed using two powerful performances, high speed multi-detector row on 32-row CT scanners (Siemens Healthcare Global, Somatom Emotion Duo Eco). Statistical analysis was done through the standard Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA) version 15 for windows. MDCTU established the correct cause of microscopic hematuria in (44; 88%) of participants. In (6; 12%) of participants, no cause of hematuria was identified based on the standard of references. The causes of hematuria in (41; 82%) participants were diseases in the upper urinary tract, while urinary bladder neoplasms (2; 4%) and diverticulum (1; 2%) were the causes of hematuria (3; 6%) in the lower urinary tract. Thirty two-row MDCTU scanner demonstrated satisfactory results in the investigation of microscopic hematuria, being able to demonstrate a wide spectrum of diseases affecting the urinary tract is the main advantage of the technique.

Share and Cite:

Mahmoud, M. , Mahmoud, M. , Omer, M. , Garalnabi, M. , Abukonna, A. and Fagiri, M. (2015) Multi-Detector Row Computed Tomography Urography (MDCTU) in the Evaluation of Microscopic Hematuria in Adults. Open Journal of Radiology, 5, 20-27. doi: 10.4236/ojrad.2015.51004.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

[1] McNicholas, M.M., Raptopoulos, V.D., Schwartz, R.K., Sheiman, R.G., Zormpala, A., et al. (1998) Excretory Phase CT Urography for Opacification of the Urinary Collecting System. American Journal of Roentgenology, 170, 1261-1267.
http://dx.doi.org/10.2214/ajr.170.5.9574598
[2] Mohr, D.N., Offord, K.P., Owen, R.A. and Melton 3rd, L.J. (1986) Asymptomatic Microhematuria and Urologic Disease: A Population-Based Study. The Journal of the American Medical Association, 256, 224-229.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/jama.256.2.224
[3] Carson, C.C., Segura, J.W. and Greene, L.F. (1979) Clinical Importance of Microhematuria. The Journal of the American Medical Association, 241, 149-150.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/jama.241.2.149
[4] Messing, E.M., Young, T.B., Hunt, V.B., Emoto, S.E. and Wehbie, J.M. (1987) The Significance of Asymptomatic Microhematuria in Man 50 or More Years Old: Findings of a Home Screening Study Using Urinary Dipsticks. Journal of Urology, 137, 919-922.
[5] Caoili, E.M., Cohan, R.H., Korobkin, M., Platt, J.F., Francis, I.R., et al. (2002) Urinary Tract Abnormalities: Initial Experience with Multi-Detector Row CT Urography. Radiology, 222, 353-360.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2222010667
[6] Caoili, E.M., Cohan, R.H., Inampudi, P., Ellis, J.H., Shah, R.B., et al. (2005) MDCT Urography of Upper Tract Urothelial Neoplasms. American Journal of Roentgenology, 184, 1873-1881.
http://dx.doi.org/10.2214/ajr.184.6.01841873
[7] Sultana, S.R., Goodman, C.M., Byrne, D.J. and Baxby, K. (1996) Microscopic Haematuria: Urological Investigation Using a Standard Protocol. British Journal of Urology, 78, 691-698.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1046/j.1464-410X.1996.01975.x
[8] Khadra, M.H., Pickard, R.S., Charlton, M., Powell, P.H. and Neal, D.E. (2000) A Prospective Analysis of 1930 Patients with Hematuria to Evaluate Current Diagnostic Practice. Journal of Urology, 163, 524-527.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5347(05)67916-5
[9] Sutton, J.M. (1990) Evaluation of Hematuria in Adults. The Journal of the American Medical Association, 263, 2475-2480.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/jama.263.18.2475
[10] Amis, E.S. (1999) Epitaph for the Urogram. Radiology, 213, 639-640.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1148/radiology.213.3.r99dc47639
[11] McNicholas, M.M., Raptopoulos, V.D., Schwartz, R.K., Sheiman, R.G., Zormpala, A., et al. (1998) Excretory Phase CT Urography for Opacification of the Urinary Collecting System. American Journal of Roentgenology, 170, 1261-1267.
http://dx.doi.org/10.2214/ajr.170.5.9574598
[12] Grossfeld, G.D., Litwin, M.S., Wolf Jr., J.S., Hricak, H., Shuler, C.L., et al. (2001) Evaluation of Asymptomatic Microscopic Hematuria in Adults: The American Urological Association Best Practice Policy—Part II: Patient Evaluation, Cytology, Voided Markers, Imaging, Cystoscopy, Nephrology Evaluation, and Follow-Up. Urology, 57, 604-610.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0090-4295(01)00920-7
[13] Chow, L.C. and Sommer, F.G. (2001) Multidetector CT Urography with Abdominal Compression and Three-Dimensional Reconstruction. American Journal of Roentgenology, 177, 849-855.
http://dx.doi.org/10.2214/ajr.177.4.1770849
[14] Grossfeld, G.D., Litwin, M.S., Wolf, J.S., Hricak, H., Shuler, C.L. and Carroll, P.R. (2001) Evaluation of Asymptomatic Microscopic Hematuria in Adults: The American Urological Association Best Practice Policy—Part I: Definition, Detection, Prevalence, and Etiology. Urology, 57, 599-603.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0090-4295(01)00919-0
[15] Webb, J.A. (1997) Imaging in Haematuria. Clinical Radiology, 52, 167-171.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0009-9260(97)80269-3
[16] Grossfeld, G.D., Wolf Jr., J.S., Litwan, M.S., Hricak, H., Shuler, C.L., et al. (2001) Asymptomatic Microscopic Hematuria in Adults: Summary of the AUA Best Practice Policy Recommendations. American Family Physician, 63, 1145-1154.
[17] Gray, C.L., Ward, J.F., Sears, S.T., Puckett, M.F., Kane, C.J. and Amling, C.L. (2002) Prospective Comparison of Computerized Tomography and Excretory Urography in the Initial Evaluation of Asymptomatic Microhematuia. Journal of Urology, 168, 2457-2460.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5347(05)64167-5
[18] Datta, S.N., Allen, G.M., Evans, R., Vaughton, K.C. and Lucas, M.G. (2002) Urinary Tract Ultrasonography in the Evaluation of Haematuria—A Report of over 1000 Cases. Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England, 84, 203-205.
[19] Dechet, C.B., Zincke, H., Sebo, T.J., King, B.F., LeRoy, A.J., et al. (2003) Prospective Analysis of Computerized Tomography and Needle Biopsy with Permanent Sectioning to Determine the Nature of Solid Renal Masses in Adults. Journal of Urology, 169, 71-74.
[20] Mariani, A.J., Mariani, M.C., Macchioni, C., Stams, U.K., Hariharan, A., et al. (1989) The Significance of Adult Hematuria: 1000 Hematuria Evaluations Including a Risk-Benefit and Cost-Effectiveness Analysis. Journal of Urology, 141, 350-355.
[21] Murakami, S., Igarashi, T., Hara, S. and Shimazaki, J. (1990) Strategies for Asymptomatic Microscopic Hematuria: A Prospective Study of 1034 Patients. Journal of Urology, 144, 99-101.
[22] Lang, E.K., Macchia, R.J., Thomas, R., Ruiz-Deya, G., Watson, R.A., et al. (2002) Computerized Tomography Tailored for the Assessment of Microscopic Hematuria. Journal of Urology, 167, 547-554.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5347(01)69083-9
[23] Cowan, N.C., Turney, B.W., Taylor, N.J., McCarthy, C.L. and Crew, J.P. (2007) Multidetector CT Urography for Diagnosing Upper Urinary Tract Urothelial Tumour. BJU International, 99, 1363-1370.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1464-410X.2007.06766.x

Copyright © 2023 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc.

Creative Commons License

This work and the related PDF file are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.