An Empirical Study on the Impact of Guanxi and Trust on External Financing Efficiency in Clusters

Abstract Full-Text HTML XML Download Download as PDF (Size:267KB) PP. 18-24
DOI: 10.4236/ib.2015.71003    5,328 Downloads   5,761 Views   Citations
Author(s)    Leave a comment

ABSTRACT

Financing is a critical bottleneck problem in the development process of SMEs. SMEs’ business activities are more closely embedded in the network, because the geographical location closeness facilitates the exchange of information and the diffusion of knowledge. We try to explore how the cluster network relations affect the efficiency of SMEs external financing efficiency. This paper takes a close look at firm financing patterns and factors that influence external financing performance of SMEs in clusters. However, our results suggest that financing from bank is the main financing pattern. We also find inter-firm trust is positively related with external financing efficiency and this positive relationship is moderated by the level of Guanxi. Theoretical and managerial implications are discussed.

Cite this paper

Wang, L. (2015) An Empirical Study on the Impact of Guanxi and Trust on External Financing Efficiency in Clusters. iBusiness, 7, 18-24. doi: 10.4236/ib.2015.71003.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

[1] Porter, M.E. (1998) Clusters and the New Economics of Competition. Harvard Business Review, 74, 6-15, 77-91.
[2] DeWitt, T., Giunipero, L.C. and Melton, H.L. (2006) Clusters and Supply Chain Management: The Amish Experience. International Journal of Physical, 35, 289-308.
[3] Tambunan, T. (2005) Promoting Small and Medium Enterprises with a Clustering Approach: A Policy Experience from Indonesia. Journal of Small Business Management, 43, 138-154.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-627X.2005.00130.x
[4] Birkinshaw, J. and Hood, N. (2000) Characteristics of Foreign Subsidiaries in Industry Clusters. Journal of International Business Studies, 31, 141-154.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8490893
[5] Moorman, C., Zaltman, G. and Deshpandé, R. (1992) Relationships between Providers and Users of Market Research: The Dynamics of Trust within and Between Organizations. Journal of Marketing Research, 29, 314-329.
http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/3172742
[6] Andaleeb, S.S. (1995) Dependence Relations and the Moderating Role of Trust: Implications for Behaviroal Intentions in Marketing Channels. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 12, 157-172.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0167-8116(94)00020-O
[7] Doney, P.M. and Cannon, J.P. (1997) An Examination of the Nature of Trust in Buyer-Seller Relationships. Journal of Marketing, 61, 35-51.
http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1251829
[8] Doney, P., Cannon, J. and Mullen, M. (1998) Understanding the Influence of National Culture on the Development of Trust. The Academy of Management Review, 23, 601-620.
[9] Golicic, S.L. and Mentzer, J.T. (2006) An Empirical Examination of Relationship Magnitude. Journal of Business Logistics, 27, 81-108.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/j.2158-1592.2006.tb00242.x
[10] Mayer, R.C., Davis, J.H. and Schoorman, F.D. (1995) An Integrative Model of Organizational Trust. Academy of Management Review, 20, 709-734.
[11] De Keijzer, A.J. (1992) China: Business Strategies for the 90s. Pacific View Press, Berkeley.
[12] Luo, Y. (1997) Guanxi: Principles, Philosophies, and Implications. Human Systems Management, 16, 43-51.

  
comments powered by Disqus

Copyright © 2020 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc.

Creative Commons License

This work and the related PDF file are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.