Share This Article:

Outcome of Early Neurological Rehabilitation Patients Colonized with Extended-Spectrum Beta-Lactamase (ESBL) Producing Bacteria

DOI: 10.4236/ojtr.2015.31001    2,991 Downloads   3,594 Views   Citations
Author(s)    Leave a comment

ABSTRACT

Colonization with multidrug-resistant germs, in particular methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) and extended-spectrum betalactamase producing bacteria (ESBL), is an emerging threat in early neurological rehabilitation. This study examined whether colonization with ESBL bacteria had deteriorating effects on neurological rehabilitation patients because of contact precautions (CP). Medical records have been carefully reviewed with respect to colonization with ESBL, outcome variables (functional independence), morbidity, and length of stay (LOS). 148/643 (23.0%) patients were ESBL positive on admission. ESBL carriers had a significantly longer LOS in early neurological rehabilitation (67.5 (42.0) vs. 25.8 (24.5), p < 0.001), worse functional status on admission (Barthel Index (BI) 13.0 (5.8) vs. 25.6 (24.1), p < 0.001), worse Glasgow Coma Scale (9.7 (3.8) vs. 12.0 (3.3), p < 0.001), worse Coma Remission Scale (9.5 (6.4) vs. 14.0 (6.8), p = 0.001), more codiagnoses (18.8 (5.1) vs. 13.3 (5.5), p < 0.001), and higher Patient Clinical Complexity Levels (PCCL). The outcome was significantly worse among ESBL positive patients (BI 28.2 (21.7) vs. 47.4 (31.0), p < 0.001; Early Rehabilitation Index -43.0 (51.7) vs. -26.0 (35.4), p < 0.001). ESBL patients had the same amount of therapy per day (136.2 (20.2) vs. 140.2 (18.7) min/day, n.s.), but the overall sum was significantly larger in the ESBL group due to longer LOS (p < 0.001). Mortality of both groups was comparable (3.8% vs. 4.1%). 54.3% of ESBL negative patients were discharged to home, but only 34.5% of ESBL colonized. 48% of ESBL positive patients were discharged to a nursing home, but only 25.1% of the ESBL free patients. Functional recovery of ESBL carriers undergoing neurological early rehabilitation is worse than that of patients without multidrug-resistant germs. Poorer outcome is not resulting from less therapy due to CP, but from functional status and higher morbidity on admission.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Cite this paper

Rollnik, J. (2015) Outcome of Early Neurological Rehabilitation Patients Colonized with Extended-Spectrum Beta-Lactamase (ESBL) Producing Bacteria. Open Journal of Therapy and Rehabilitation, 3, 1-8. doi: 10.4236/ojtr.2015.31001.

References

[1] Rollnik, J.D. (2014) Outcome of MRSA Carriers in Neurological Early Rehabilitation. BMC Neurology, 14, 34. http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2377-14-34
[2] Rollnik, J.D. (2014) Mulitdrug-Resistant Germs in Neurological Early Rehabilitation (2004-2013). Rehabilitation (Stuttg), in Press.
[3] Bilavsky, E., Temkin, E., Lerman, Y., Rabinovich, A., Salomon, J., Lawrence, C., Rossini, A., Salvia, A., Samso, J.V., Fierro, J., Paul, M., Hart, J., Gniadkowski, M., Hochman, M., Kazma, M., Klein, A., Adler, A., Schwaber, M.J. and Carmeli, Y. (2014) The MOSAR WP5 Study Team: Risk Factors for Colonization with Extended-Spectrum Beta-Lactamase-Producing Enterobacteriaceae on Admission to Rehabilitation Centres. Clinical Microbiology and Infection, 20, O804-O810.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1469-0691.12633
[4] Adler, A., Baraniak, A., Izdebski, R., Fiett, J., Salvia, A., Samso, J.V., Lawrence, C., Solomon, J., Paul, M., Lerman, Y., Schwartzberg, Y., Mordechai, E., Rossini, A., Fierro, J., Lammens, C., Malhotra-Kumar, S., Goossens, H., Hryniewicz, W., Brun-Buisson, C., Gniadkowski, M. and Carmeli, Y. (2014) MOSAR Team: A Multinational Study of Colonization with Extended Spectrum β-Lactamase-Producing Enterobacteriaceae in Healthcare Personnel and Family Members of Carrier Patients Hospitalized in Rehabilitation Centres. Clinical Microbiology and Infection, 20, O516- O523.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1469-0691.12560
[5] Adler, A., Baraniak, A., Izdebski, R., Fiett, J., Gniadkowski, M., Hryniewicz, W., Salvia, A., Rossini, A., Goossens, H., Malhotra, S., Lerman, Y., Elenbogen, M. and Carmeli, Y. (2013) MOSAR WP5 & WP2 Study Groups: A Binational Cohort Study of Intestinal Colonization with Extended-Spectrum β-Lactamase-Producing Proteus mirabilis in Patients Admitted to Rehabilitation Centres. Clinical Microbiology and Infection, 19, E51-E8. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1469-0691.12072
[6] Hollander, R., Ebke, M., Barck, H. and von Pritzbuer, E. (2001) Asymptomatic Carriage of Klebsiella pneumoniae Producing Extended-Spectrum Beta-Lactamase by Patients in a Neurological Early Rehabilitation Unit: Management of an Outbreak. Journal of Hospital Infection, 48, 207-213.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1053/jhin.2001.0997
[7] Slim, E., Smit, C.A., Bos, A.J. and Peerbooms, P.G. (2009) Nosocomial Transmission of Highly Resistant Microorganisms on a Spinal Cord Rehabilitation Ward. Journal of Spinal Cord Medicine, 32, 422-427.
[8] Kommission für Krankenhaushygiene und Infektionsprävention (KRINKO) beim Robert-Koch-Institut (RKI) (2012) Hygienemaßnahmen bei Infektionen oder Besiedelung mit multiresistenten gramnegativen Stäbchen. Bundesgesundheitsbl-Gesundheitsforsch-Gesundheitsschutz, 55, 1311-1354. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00103-012-1549-5
[9] Pike, J.H. and McLean, D. (2002) Ethical Concerns in Isolating Patients with Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus Aureus on the Rehabilitation Ward: A Case Report. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 83, 1028-1030. http://dx.doi.org/10.1053/apmr.2002.33108
[10] Tarzi, S., Kennedy, P., Stone, S. and Evans, M. (2001) Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus Aureus: Psychological Impact of Hospitalization and Isolation in an Older Adult Population. Journal of Hospital Infection, 49, 250-254. http://dx.doi.org/10.1053/jhin.2001.1098
[11] Morgan, D.J., Diekema, D.J., Sepkowitz, K. and Perencevich, E.N. (2009) Adverse Outcomes Associated with Contact Precautions: A Review of the Literature. American Journal of Infection Control, 37, 85-93. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ajic.2008.04.257
[12] Rollnik, J.D. and Janosch, U. (2010) Current Trends in the Length of Stay in Neurological Early Rehabilitation. Deutsches Ärzteblatt International, 107, 286-292.
[13] Mahoney, F.I. and Barthel, D.W. (1965) Functional Evaluation: The Barthel Index. Maryland State Medical Journal, 14, 61-65.
[14] Rollnik, J.D. (2011) The Early Rehabilitation Barthel Index (ERBI). Rehabilitation, 50, 408-411.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0031-1273728
[15] Teasdale, G. and Jennett, B. (1974) Assessment of Coma and Impaired Consciousness. A Practical Scale. The Lancet, 2, 81-83. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(74)91639-0
[16] Ortega-Suhrkamp, E. and von Wild, K.R. (2002) Standards of Neurologic-Neurosurgical Early Rehabilitation—A Concept of the Study Group Neurological-Neurosurgical Early Rehabilitation. Acta Neurochirurgica Supplement, 79, 11-19.
[17] Alvsåker, K., Walther, S.M., Kleffelgård, I., Mongs, M., Drægebø, R.A. and Keller, A. (2011) Inter-Rater Reliability of the Early Functional Abilities Scale. Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine, 43, 892-899.
[18] Huttner, B., Haustein, T., Uçkay, I., Renzi, G., Stewardson, A., Schaerrer, D., Agostinho, A., Andremont, A., Schrenzel, J., Pittet, D. and Harbarth, S. (2013) Decolonization of Intestinal Carriage of Extended-Spectrum β-Lactamase-Producing Enterobacteriaceae with Oral Colistin and Neomycin: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Trial. Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy, 68, 2375-2382.
[19] Kwakkel, G. and Kollen, B.J. (2013) Predicting Activities after Stroke: What Is Clinically Relevant? International Journal of Stroke, 8, 25-32. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1747-4949.2012.00967.x
[20] Pettersen, R., Dahl, T. and Wyller, T.B. (2002) Prediction of Long-Term Functional Outcome after Stroke Rehabilitation. Clinical Rehabilitation, 16, 149-159.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1191/0269215502cr482oa
[21] Rollnik, J.D. (2009) Barthel-Index as a Length of Stay Predictor in Neurological Rehabilitation. Rehabilitation, 48, 91- 94. http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0029-1202294

  
comments powered by Disqus

Copyright © 2019 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc.

Creative Commons License

This work and the related PDF file are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.