The Phenomenology of Leadership

DOI: 10.4236/ojl.2014.34008   PDF   HTML   XML   5,883 Downloads   8,840 Views   Citations


Teaching people about leadership is different from creating leaders. Teaching leadership uses a third-person approach to impart someone else’s knowledge, which grants learners limited direct access to the being and actions of effective leaders. In contrast, creating leaders entails a first-person phenomenological methodology, which provides direct access to what it means to be a leader and what it means to exercise good leadership in real time, with real results. The distinctiveness of the first-person “as-lived/lived-through” approach lies in its capacity to disclose the hidden contexts that shape the ways of being, thinking, and acting that are the source of the leader’s performance. When these contexts become unveiled, it allows for the creation of new contexts that give leaders more space and more degrees of freedom to lead effectively as their natural self-expression. A phenomenological inquiry into leadership does not study the attributes of leaders, but rather the fundamental structures of human “being” that make it possible to be a leader in the first place. Because the phenomenological “facts” of lived experience reside in language, creating for oneself what it is to be a leader entails mastering a special language (that includes terms like intentionality; thrownness; being-in-the-world; clearing-for-action; absorbed coping; hermeneutic; and, break-down) from which leaders can orient their being, thinking, and actions. Learning to be a leader is not first and foremost about the acquisition of knowledge or certain personal attributes. Rather, only when leadership becomes an as-lived/lived-through experience does it grant access to its actual nature and essence.

Share and Cite:

Souba, W. (2014) The Phenomenology of Leadership. Open Journal of Leadership, 3, 77-105. doi: 10.4236/ojl.2014.34008.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.


[1] Agosta, L. (2010). Empathy in the Context of Philosophy. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
[2] Aho, K. (2009). Heidegger’s Neglect of the Body. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
[3] Anton, C. (1999). Beyond the Constitutive-Representational Dichotomy: The Phenomenological Notion of Intentionality. Communication Theory, 9, 26-57.
[4] Anton, C. (2014). Diachronic Phenomenology: A Methodological Thread within Media Ecology. Explorations in Media Ecology, 13, 9-36.
[5] Bineham, J. (1995). The Hermeneutic Medium. Philosophy and Rhetoric, 28, 1-16.
[6] Blattner, W. (2005). Temporality. In H. Dreyfus, & M. Wrathall (Eds.), A Companion to Heidegger (pp. 311-324). Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing.
[7] Blattner, W. (2006). Heidegger’s Being and Time: A Reader’s Guide. London: Continuum Books.
[8] Boje, D., Oswick, C., & Ford, J. (2004). Language and Organization: The Doing of Discourse. Academy of Management Review, 29, 571-577.
[9] Borrie, W. (1995). Letting It Be: Heidegger, Leisure and Wilderness. 1995 National Recreation and Park Association Leisure Research Symposium.
[10] Burch, R. (1990). Phenomenology, Lived Experience: Taking a Measure of the Topic. Phenomenology + Pedagogy, 8, 130-160.
[11] Burns, J. M. (1978). Leadership. New York: Harper and Row.
[12] Calarco, M., & Atterton, P. (2003). The Continental Ethics Reader. New York: Routledge.
[13] Carruthers, P. (1996). Language, Thought and Consciousness: An Essay in Philosophical Psychology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
[14] Costall, A. (1995). Socializing Affordances. Theory & Psychology, 5, 467-481.
[15] Critchley, S. (2009a). Being and Time, Part 3: Being-in-the-World.
[16] Critchley, S. (2009b). Being and Time, Part 4: Thrown into this World.
[17] Dahlstrom, D. (2013). Heidegger’s Ontological Analysis of Language. In J. Powell (Ed.), Heidegger and Language (pp. 13-31). Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.
[18] Dahlstrom, D. (2014). Existential Socialization. In H. Pedersen et al. (Eds.), Horizons of Authenticity in Phenomenology, Existentialism, and Moral Psychology (pp. 329-346). New York: Springer.
[19] Deming, W. (1986). Out of the Crisis. Cambridge: MIT Press.
[20] Douglas, N., & Wykowski, T. (2010). From Belief to Knowledge: Achieving and Sustaining an Adaptive Culture in Culture in Organizations. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
[21] Dreyfus, H. (1991). Being-in-the-World: A Commentary on Heidegger’s Beingand Time, Division I. Cambridge: MIT Press.
[22] Dreyfus, H. (1993). Heidegger’s Critique of the Husserl/Searle Account of Intentionality. Social Research, 60, 143-170.
[23] Dreyfus, H. (2002). Refocusing the Question: Can There Be Skillful Coping without Propositional Representations or Brain Representations? Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences, 1, 413-425.
[24] Dreyfus, H., & Dreyfus, S. (1996). The Relationship of Theory and Practice in the Acquisition of Skill. In P. Benner, C. Tanner, & C. Chesla (Eds.), Expertise in Nursing Practice: Caring, Clinical Judgment, and Ethics (pp. 1-24). New York: Springer.
[25] Dreyfus, H., & Wrathall, M. (2005). Martin Heidegger: An Introduction to His Thought, Work, and Life. In H. Dreyfus, & M. Wrathall (Eds.), A Companion to Heidegger (pp. 1-15). Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing.
[26] Dreyfus, S., & Dreyfus, H. (1980). A Five-Stage Model of the Mental Activities Involved in Directed Skill Acquisition.
[27] Drucker, P. (1980). Managing in Turbulent Times. New York: Harper-Collins.
[28] Erhard, W. (2009). How Language Shapes the World: A New Model Providing Actionable Access to the Source of Performance (PDF File of Powerpoint Slides). Barbados Group Working Paper No. 09-03, John F. Kennedy School of Government, Harvard University.
[29] Erhard, W., Jensen, M., & DiMaggio, J. (2013). Living with Mastery: What It Takes (PDF File of PowerPoint Slides). Harvard Business School NOM Unit Working Paper 11-067, Barbados Group Working Paper No. 11-01.
[30] Erhard, W., Jensen, M., & Granger, K. (2011). Creating Leaders: An Ontological/Phenomenological Model. In S. Snook, N. Nohria, & R. Khurana (Eds.), The Handbook For Teaching Leadership (pp. 245-262). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
[31] Feigenbaum, E. (1983). The Fifth Generation: Artificial Intelligence and Japan’s Computer Challenge to the World. Boston, MA: Addison Wesley Publishing.
[32] Flatley, J. (2008). Affective Mapping: Melancholia and the Politics of Modernism. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
[33] Gadamer, H. G. (2005). Truth and Method. Translated and Edited by J. Weinsheimer, & D. G. Marshall. New York: Continuum Publishing Group.
[34] Gaines, E. (2003). The Necessary Ambiguity of Communication. Semiotics 2002. Semiotic Society of America. In T. Prewitt, & J. Deely (Eds.), Media Literacy and Semiotics. New York: Legas Publishing.
[35] Gallagher, S., & Zahavi, D. (2014). Primal Impression and Enactive Perception. In D. Lloyd, & V. Arstila (Eds.), Subjective Time: The Philosophy, Psychology, and Neuroscience of Temporality (pp. 83-99). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
[36] Gardner, J. (1990). On Leadership. New York: The Free Press.
[37] Gelven, M. (1989). A Commentary on Heidegger’s Being and Time. Dekalb, IL: Northern Illinois University Press.
[38] Gendlin, E. (1967). An Analysis of What Is a Thing? In M. Heidegger (Ed.), What Is a Thing? (W. Barton, & V. Deutsch, Trans., pp. 247-296). Chicago, IL: Henry Regnery.
[39] Geniusas, S. (2012). The Origins of the Horizon in Husserl’s Phenomenology. New York: Springer.
[40] Gibbs, P. (2011). The Concept of Profound Boredom: Learning from Moments of Vision. Studies in Philosophy and Education, 30, 601-613.
[41] Greenfield, P. (2013). The Changing Psychology of Culture from 1800 through 2000. Psychological Science, 24, 1722-1731.
[42] Guignon, C. (1993). Authenticity, Moral Values, and Psychotherapy. In C. Guignon (Ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Heidegger (pp. 215-239). New York: Cambridge University Press.
[43] Gurwitsch, A. (1979). Human Encounters in the Social World. Pittsburgh, PA: Duquesne University Press.
[44] Heidegger, M. (1962). Being and Time. Trans. by J. Macquarrie, & E. Robinson. London: SCM Press.
[45] Heidegger, M. (1966). Discourse on Thinking. Trans. by J. Anderson, & E. Freund. New York: Harper and Row.
[46] Heidegger, M. (1968). What Is Called Thinking? Trans. by J. Glenn Gray. New York: Harper and Row.
[47] Heidegger, M. (1982). The Basic Problems of Phenomenology. Trans. by A. Hofstadter. Bloomington, IN: IA University Press.
[48] Heidegger, M. (1993a). The Way to Language. In: D. Krell (Ed.), Basic Writings (pp. 393-426). New York: Harper Collins.
[49] Heidegger, M. (1993b). Letter on Humanism. In: D. Krell (Ed.), Basic Writings (pp. 213-266). New York: Harper Collins.
[50] Heidegger, M. (1996). Being and Time. Trans. by J. Stambaugh. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
[51] Heidegger, M. (2002). The Origin of the Work of Art. In: Off the Beaten Track (Trans. by J. Young, & K. Haynes, pp. 1-56). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
[52] Heifetz, R., & Laurie, D. (2001). The Work of Leadership. Harvard Business Review, 79, 131-141.
[53] Hoefer, C. (2010). Causal Determinism. The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Spring 2010), EN Zalta (Ed.).
[54] Hyde, M. (1983). Rhetorically Man Dwells: On the Making-Known Function of Discourse. Communication, 7, 201-220.
[55] Hyde, R. B. (1991). Saying the Clearing: A Heideggerian Analysis of the Ontological Rhetoric of Werner Erhard. Ph.D. Dissertation, Los Angeles, CA: University of Southern California.
[56] Hyde, R. B. (1994). Listening Authentically: A Heideggerian Perspective on Interpersonal Communication. In K. Carter, & M. Presnell (Eds.), Interpretive Approaches to Interpersonal Communication (pp. 179-197). Albany, NY: SUNY Press.
[57] Ingthorsson, R. (2013). The Natural vs. the Human Sciences: Myth, Methodology and Ontology. Discusiones Filosoficas, 14, 25-34.
[58] Iran-Nejad, A., & Houser, R. (2013). From Second/Third-Person Education Monodisciplines to First-Person Educational Science: An Integrating Disciplines Perspective. Academia Journal of Educational Research, 1, 8-18.
[59] Jacquin, C. S. A. I. N. T. (2013). How to Live More Fully in the Spirit. Bloomington, IN: Balboa Press.
[60] Joy, L. (2002). Individual and Societal Transformation: The Connection.
[61] Kekes, J. (1980). Nature of Philosophy. Totowa, NJ: Rowman and Littlefield.
[62] Keller, S., & Price, C. (2011). Beyond Performance: How Great Organizations Build Ultimate Competitive Advantage. New York: Wiley.
[63] Kockelmans, J. (1987). Husserl’s Original View on Phenomenological Psychology. In J. Kockelmans (Ed.), Phenomenological Psychology: The Dutch School (pp. 3-29). Dordrecht: Martinus Nijhoff.
[64] Korab-Karpowicz, W. (2009).
[65] Korsgaard, C. (1996). The Sources of Normativity. New York: Cambridge University Press.
[66] Krausz, M. (2002). Is There a Single Right Interpretation? University Park, PA: Pennsylvania State University Press.
[67] Laing, R. D. (1967). The Politics of Experience. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
[68] Lebeau, L., & Maclean, D. (2006). Awakening the Fire within: Relationship, Leadership & Self-Esteem. Bloomington, IN: Trafford Publishing.
[69] Lester, G. (2000). Why Bad Beliefs Don’t Die. Skeptical Inquirer, 24.
[70] Levine, L. (1988). Bird: The Making of an American Sports Legend. New York: McGraw Hill.
[71] Lung, H. (2011). Ultimate Mind Control. New York: Citadel Publishers.
[72] Markic, O. (2012). First-and Third-Person Approaches: The Problem of Integration. Interdisciplinary Description of Complex Systems, 10, 213-222.
[73] McKenna, W. (1982). Husserl’s Introductions to Phenomenology: Interpretation and Critique. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff.
[74] Moore, C. F. (1909). Moore’s History of the United Sates: United and Otherwise. New York: Neale Publishing.
[75] Moran, D. (2000). Introduction to Phenomenology. New York: Routledge.
[76] Moustakas, C. (1994). Phenomenological Research Methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
[77] Mulhall, S. (1996). Heidegger and Being and Time. London: Routledge.
[78] Nadal, P. (2010). Thinking Being Human: Notes on Heidegger’s Letter on Humanism.
[79] Okrent, M. (1999). Heidegger and Korsgaard on Human Reflection. Philosophical Topics, 27, 47-76.
[80] Palmer, R. E. (1969). Hermeneutics: Interpretation Theory in Schleiermacher, Dilthey, Heidegger, and Gadamer. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.
[81] Pangaro, P. (1996). Cybernetics and Conversation.
[82] Pangaro, P. (2002). Notes on the Role of Leadership and Language in Regenerating Organizations.
[83] Pascale, R., Milleman, M., & Gioja, L. (2000). Surfing the Edge of Chaos. New York: Three Rivers Press.
[84] Pinker, S. (2000). Words and Rules: The Ingredients of Language. Quezon City: Phoenix Publishing.
[85] Polt, R. (2005). Heidegger’s Being and Time: Critical Essays. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield.
[86] Rhees, R. (1984). Recollections of Wittgenstein. Oxford: Blackwell.
[87] Rorty, R. (1986). The Contingency of Language. London Review of Books, 8, 3-6.
[88] Sallis, J. (1995). Delimitations: Phenomenology and the End of Metaphysics. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.
[89] Sartre, J. P. (1946). Existentialism Is a Humanism. Cleveland, OH: World Publishing Company.
[90] Schatzki, T. (2005). Early Heidegger on Sociality. In H. Dreyfus, & M. Wrathall (Eds.), A Companion to Heidegger (pp. 233-247). Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing.
[91] Schon, D. (1983). The Reflective Practitioner. How Professionals Think in Action. New York: Basic Books.
[92] Schon, D. (1987). Educating the Reflective Practitioner: Toward a New Design for Teaching and Learning in the Professions. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
[93] Smith, D. (2013). Phenomenology. The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Winter Edition). E. N. Zalta (Ed.).
[94] Smythe, E., & Norton, A. (2007). Thinking as Leadership/Leadership as Thinking. Leadership, 3, 65-90.
[95] Soccio, T. (2007). Archetypes of Wisdom: An Introduction to Philosophy. Belmont, CA: Thomson Wadsworth.
[96] Souba, W. (2006). The Inward Journey of Leadership. Journal of Surgical Research, 131, 159-167.
[97] Souba, W. (2010). The Language of Leadership. Academic Medicine, 85, 1609-1618.
[98] Souba, W. (2011). Perspective: A New Model of Leadership Performance in Health Care. Academic Medicine, 86, 1241-1252.
[99] Souba, W. (2013). The Science of Leading Yourself: A Missing Piece in the Healthcare Reform Puzzle. Open Journal of Leadership, 2, 45-55.
[100] Souba, W. (2014). Rethinking Leadership Development. The Pharos, 77, 3-6.
[101] Steiner, C. (2002). The Technicity Paradigm and Scientism in Qualitative Research. The Qualitative Report, 7. Accessed 3/19/2014
[102] Steiner, G. (1978). Heidegger. Sussex: Harvester Press Limited.
[103] Sutton, J., McIlwain, D., Christensen, W., & Geeves, A. (2011). Applying Intelligence to the Reflexes: Embodied Skills and Habits between Dreyfus and Descartes. Journal of the British Society for Phenomenology, 42, 79-103.
[104] Tieszen, R. (2013). Analytic and Continental Philosophy, Science, and Global Philosophy. In B. Mou, & R. Tieszen (Eds.), Constructive Engagement of Analytic and Continental Approaches in Philosophy (pp. 103-124). Leiden: Koninklijke Brill.
[105] Twain, M. (1888). Letter to George Bainton.
[106] Van Gulick, R. (2014). Consciousness. In E. N. Zalta (Ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Berlin: Spring.
[107] Van Manen, M. (2007). Phenomenology of Practice. Phenomenology & Practice, 1, 11-30.
[108] Van Manen, M. (2011). Language Itself Is a Source of Meaning. Phenomenology Online.
[109] Van Manen, M. (2014). Phenomenology of Practice: Meaning-Giving Methods in Phenomenological Research and Writing. Walnut Creek, CA: Left Coast Press.
[110] Varela, F., & Shear, J. (1999). First-Person Methodologies: What, Why, How? Journal Consciousness Studies, 6, 1-14.
[111] Von Ward, P. (2012). Worldviews and Evolution of Human Consciousness. Spanda Journal, 3.
[112] Webber, J. (2002). Doing without Representation: Coping with Dreyfus. Philosophical Explorations: An International Journal for the Philosophy of Mind and Action, 5, 82-88.
[113] Wheeler, M. (2013). Martin Heidegger. In E. N. Zalta (Ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Spring 2013 Edition).
[114] Wiener, N. (1988). The Human Use of Human Beings: Cybernetics and Society. Boston, MA: Da Capo Press.
[115] Wilde, O. (1964). De Profundis. New York: Vintage Books.
[116] Zaffron, S., & Logan, D. (2009). The Three Laws of Performance. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

comments powered by Disqus

Copyright © 2020 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc.

Creative Commons License

This work and the related PDF file are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.