Non-Consumptive Activities on a Public Hunting and Fishing Area

Greg Simpson, Michael E. Barnes^*, Timothy M. Parker, Jill Voorhees

South Dakota Department of Game, Fish and Parks, Rapid City, South Dakota, USA.

DOI: 10.4236/nr.2014.514075                

Abstract

The activities of all 1513 individuals who visited a public hunting and fishing area near Spearfish, South Dakota, USA, were recorded from May 16 to August 16, 2006. Over the entire period, slightly less than 60% of the visitors were engaged in fishing, and they accounted for nearly 80% of the total visitation time. Over 40% of the visitors were primarily there for non-consumptive (not hunting or fishing) reasons, including touring (sight-seeing), dog training and exercising, and swimming. Less than 1% of the visitors were there for photography. The percentage of visitors fishing decreased from a high of over 65% in the first 31-day period to less than 50% in the third 31-day period, with nearly all of the non-consumptive activities showing a reverse trend. The percentage of visitors swimming or conducting dog activities doubled from the first to third periods. The percentage of time that visitors spent fishing decreased over time, while the time spent on non-consumptive activities increased. However, the increase in non-consumptive activity time was not necessarily in proportion to the increase in the number of visitors involved with non-consumptive activities. By the final period, more visitors were at the area for touring, dogs, and swimming, than for fishing, but fishing still accounted for most of the visitation time. These results indicate an abundance of non-consumptive activities on a public area purchased and maintained with revenue from consumptive hunting and fishing activities, creating the opportunity for user conflicts and potentially threatening the user-pay model of natural resource conservation.

Keywords

Public Land, Fishing, Hunting, Non-Consumptive Activities, Dogs, Visitation

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

[1]	South Dakota Department of Game, Fish and Parks (SDGFP) (2014) Hunting Areas. http://gfp.sd.gov/hunting/areas/
[2]	United States Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWLS) (2014) Federal Aid Division—The Pittman-Robertson Federal Aid in Wildlife Restoration Act. http://www.fws.gov/southeast/federalaid/pittmanrobertson.html
[3]	Williamson, L.L. (1987) Evolution of a Landmark Law. In: Kallman, H., Ed., Restoring America’s Wildlife 1937-1987, United States Department of Interior, Fish and Wildlife Service, Washington, DC, 1-18.
[4]	Belyea, G.Y. and Lerg, J.M. (1976) Public Use of Southern Michigan Game and Recreation Areas. Michigan Department of Natural Resources Wildlife Division Report 2754.
[5]	Nelson, C.M., Steffey, E. and Clark, E. (2006) State Game and Wildlife Area Recreation Use Assessment: Michigan’s Maple Rive State Game Area, Fall 2005. Proceedings of the 2006 Northeastern Recreation Research Symposium, United States Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Northern Research Station General Technical Report NRSP-14.
[6]	Barnes, M.E., Simpson, G., Carreiro, J. and Voorhees, J. (2014) A Comparison of a Creel Census to Modeled AccessPoint Creel Surveys on Two Small Lakes Managed as Put-and-Take Rainbow Trout Fisheries. Fisheries and Aquaculture Journal, 5, 086. http://dx.doi.org/10.4172/2150-3508.1000086 http://astonjournals.com/manuscripts/Vol_5_2014/FAJ_Vol5_1_a-comparison-of-a-creel-census-to-modeled-accesspoint-creel-surveys-on-two-small-lakes-managed-as-putandtake-rainbow-trout-fisheries.pdf
[7]	Raphael, C.N. and Jaworski, E. (1979) Economic Value of Fish, Wildlife, and Recreation in Michigan’s Coastal Wetlands. Coastal Zone Management Journal, 5, 181-194. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/08920757909361805
[8]	Boyle, S.A. and Samson, F.B. (1985) Effects of Nonconsumptive Recreation on Wildlife: A Review. Wildlife Society Bulletin, 13, 110-116.
[9]	Blanc, R., Guillemain, M., Mouronval, J-B., Desmonts, D. and Fritz, H. (2006) Effects of Non-Consumptive Leisure Disturbance to Wildlife. Revue D Ecologie-La Terre Et La Vie, 61, 117-133.
[10]	Lenth, B.E., Knight, R.L. and Brennan, M.E. (2008) The Effects of Dogs on Wildlife Communities. Natural Areas Journal, 28, 218-227. http://dx.doi.org/10.3375/0885-8608(2008)28[218:TEODOW]2.0.CO;2
[11]	Banks, P.B. and Bryant, J.V. (2007) Four-Legged Friend or Foe? Dog Walking Displaces Native Birds from Natural Areas. Biology Letters, 6, 611-613. http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rsbl.2007.0374
[12]	Freddy, D.J., Bronaugh, W.M. and Fowler, M.C. (1986) Responses of Mule Deer to Disturbance by Persons Afoot and Snowmobiles. Wildlife Society Bulletin, 14, 63-68.
[13]	Taylor, A.R. and Knight, R.L. (2003) Wildlife Responses to Recreation and Associated Visitor Perceptions. Ecological Applications, 13, 951-963. http://dx.doi.org/10.1890/1051-0761(2003)13[951:WRTRAA]2.0.CO;2
[14]	Liddle, M.J. (1975) A Selective Review of the Ecological Effects of Human Trampling on Natural Ecosystems. Biological Conservation, 17, 183-206. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0006-3207(80)90055-5
[15]	Aney, W.W. and Cowan, C.D. (1974) Oregon Wildlife Preferences and Activity Survey, Summary Report. Oregon Wildlife Commission, Corvallis, Oregon.
[16]	Langenau, E. (1975) Appreciative Uses of Michigan White-Tailed Deer: Progress Report. Michigan Department of Natural Resources, Lansing, Michigan.
[17]	Betz, C.J. and Cordell, H.K. (1989) Trends in Recreation Participation on Public Lands. In: Watson, A.H., Ed., Compiler Outdoor Recreation Benchmark: Proceedings of the National Outdoor Recreation Forum, United States Department of Agriculture Forest Service, Southeastern Forest Experiment Station General Technical Report SE-52, Asheville, North Carolina.
[18]	More, T.A. (1979) The Demand for Nonconsumptive Wildlife Resources: A Review of the Literature. United States Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Northeastern Forest Experiment Station General Technical Report NE-52.
[19]	United States Census Bureau (USCB) (2014) State Median Income, Annual Social and Economic Supplement, Current Income of Households by State. https://www.census.gov/hhes/www/income/data/statemedian/
[20]	Stedman, R.C. (2002) Toward a Social Psychology of Place Predicting Behavior from Place-Based Cognitions, Attitude, and Identity. Environment and Behavior, 34, 561-581. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0013916502034005001
[21]	Ewert, A., Place, G. and Sibthorp, J. (2005) Early-Life Outdoor Experiences and an Individual’s Environmental Attitudes. Leisure Sciences, 27, 225-239. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01490400590930853
[22]	Bilgic, A., Florkowski, W.J., Yoder, J. and Schreiner, D.F. (2008) Estimating Fishing and Hunting Leisure Spending Shares in the United States. Tourism Management, 29, 771-782. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2007.09.001
[23]	Hay, M.J. and McConnell, K.E. (1984) Harvesting and Nonconsumptive Wildlife Recreation Decisions. Land Economics, 60, 388-396. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/3145715
[24]	Heberlein, T.A. (1991) Changing Attitudes and Funding for Wildlife—Preserving the Sport Hunter. Wildlife Society Bulletin, 19, 528-534.
[25]	McFarlane, B.L. and Boxall, P.C. (1996) Participation in Wildlife Conservation by Birdwatchers. Human Dimensions of Wildlife, 1, 1-14. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10871209609359066