Use of Lexical Stress during Oral Reading among Japanese EFL Learners

Abstract

The purpose of the present study is to examine second language (L2) oral reading with a focus on lexical stress. We conducted oral reading tasks to investigate whether 14 Japanese learners of English as a foreign language (EFL) read words aloud with different lexical stress (one- or two- stress words) with appropriate stress assignment, similar to a comparison group of 14 native English speakers, in order to see whether EFL learners, who have fewer verbal input and output opportunities, assign the proper stress(es) in oral reading contexts. The participants read 18 pairs of four-syllable one- and two-stress words both in isolation and in sentence context conditions, and the whole word duration, syllable duration, and syllable intensity were analyzed. The results showed that both groups of readers (1) read two-stress words longer than one-stress words and (2) read stressed syllables longer than unstressed syllables with appropriate stress assignment. Our findings suggest that intermediate EFL learners can recognize and manipulate L2 prosodic information, even though their L1 does not possess the property. Future directions for L2 oral reading research development are discussed.

Share and Cite:

Yoshikawa, L. and Leung, C. Y. (2014) Use of Lexical Stress during Oral Reading among Japanese EFL Learners. Open Journal of Modern Linguistics, 4, 573-584. doi: 10.4236/ojml.2014.45050.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

[1] Coltheart, M. (1981). The MRC Psycholinguistic Database. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 33A, 497-505.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14640748108400805
[2] Fodor, J. D. (1998). Learning to Parse? Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 27, 285-319.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1023258301588
[3] Fuchs, L. S., Fuchs, D., Hosp, M. K., & Jenkins, J. R. (2001). Oral Reading Fluency as an Indicator of Reading Competence: A Theoretical, Empirical, and Historical Analysis. Scientific Studies of Reading, 5, 239-256.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/S1532799XSSR0503_3
[4] Goss, S., & Nakayama, M. (2011). Prosody and Comprehension in Oral Reading by L2 Japanese Learners. Second Language, 10, 33-50.
[5] Gutiérrez-Palma, N., & Palma-Reyes, A. (2008). On the Use of Lexical Stress in Reading Spanish. Reading and Writing: Academic Disciplinary Journal, 21, 645-660.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11145-007-9082-x
[6] Hirata, Y. (2004). Effects of Speaking Rate on the Vowel Length Distinction in Japanese. Journal of Phonetics, 32, 565-589.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.wocn.2004.02.004
[7] Hirotani, M., Frazier, L., & Rayner, K. (2006). Punctuation and Intonation Effects on Clause and Sentence Wrap-Up: Evidence from Eye Movements. Journal of Memory and Language, 54, 425-443.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2005.12.001
[8] Hoequist Jr., C. (1983). Syllable Duration in Stress-, Syllable-, and Mora-Timed Languages. Phonetica, 40, 203-237.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1159/000261692
[9] JACET Committee of Basic Words Revision (Ed.) (2003). JACET List of 8000 Basic Words: JACET 8000. Tokyo: JACET.
[10] Jeon, E. H. (2013). Oral Reading Fluency in Second Language Reading. Reading in a Foreign Language, 24, 186-208.
[11] Jiang, X., Sawaki, Y., & Sabatini, J. (2012). Word Reading Efficiency, Text Reading Fluency, and Reading Comprehension among Chinese Learners of English. Reading Psychology, 33, 323-349.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02702711.2010.526051
[12] Kuhn, M. R., Schwanenflugel, P. J., & Meisinger, E. B. (2010). Aligning Theory and Assessment of Reading Fluency: Automaticity, Prosody, and Definitions of Fluency. Reading Research Quarterly, 45, 230-251.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1598/RRQ.45.2.4
[13] Kuriyagawa, F., & Sawashima, M. (1989). Word Accent, Devoicing and Duration of Vowels in Japanese. Annual Bulletin of the Research Institute, 23, 85-108.
[14] Merriam-Webster’s Online Dictionary (11th ed.) (n.d.). Retrieved June 16, 2014.
http://www.m-w.com/dictionary
[15] Miller, J., & Schwanenflugel, P. J. (2006). Prosody of Syntactically Complex Sentences in the Oral Reading of Young Children. Journal of Educational Psychology, 98, 839-853.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.98.4.839
[16] Miller, J., & Schwanenflugel, P. J. (2008). A Longitudinal Study of the Development of Reading Prosody as a Dimension of Oral Reading Fluency in Early Elementary School Children. Reading Research Quarterly, 43, 336-354.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1598/RRQ.43.4.2
[17] Perfetti, C. A. (2003). The Universal Grammar of Reading. Scientific Studies of Reading, 7, 3-24.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/S1532799XSSR0701_02
[18] Perfetti, C., Cao, F., & Booth, J. (2013). Specialization and Universals in the Development of Reading Skill: How Chinese Research Informs a Universal Science of Reading. Scientific Studies of Reading, 17, 5-21.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10888438.2012.689786
[19] Schreiber, P. A. (1991). Understanding Prosody’s Role in Reading Acquisition. Theory into Practice, 30, 158-164.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00405849109543496
[20] Stephens, M. A. (2011). Why Exposure to Prosody Should Precede the Teaching of Reading. The Language Teacher, 35, 68-73.
[21] Wagner, M., & Watson, D. G. (2010). Experimental and Theoretical Advances in Prosody: A Review. Language and Cognitive Processes, 25, 905-945.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01690961003589492
[22] Yamashita, J., & Amano, S. (2011). Relationship of Oral Reading Prosody to English Language Proficiency in Japanese EFL Learners: A Preliminary Study. JACET Chubu Journal, 9, 155-168.

Copyright © 2023 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc.

Creative Commons License

This work and the related PDF file are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.