Implementation Study of a Centralized Routing Protocol for Data Acquisition in Wireless Sensor Networks
Trung Hieu Pham, Xue Jun Li, Wai Yee Leong, Peter Han Joo Chong
.
DOI: 10.4236/wsn.2011.35019   PDF   HTML     5,929 Downloads   11,369 Views  

Abstract

Wireless sensor networks (WSNs) attract considerable amount of research efforts from both industry and academia. With limited power and computational capability available on a sensor node, robustness and efficiency are the main concerns when designing a routing protocol for WSNs with low complexity. There are various existing design approaches, such as data-centric approach, hierarchical approach and location-based approach, which were designed for a particular application with specific requirements. In this paper, we study the design and implementation of a routing protocol for data acquisition in WSNs. The designed routing protocol is named Centralized Sensor Protocol for Information via Negotiation (CSPIN), which essentially combines the advertise-request-transfer process and a routing distribution mechanism. Implementation is realized and demonstrated with the Crossbow MicaZ hardware using nesC/TinyOS. It was our intention to provide a hand-on study of implementation of centralized routing protocol for WSNs.

Share and Cite:

T. Pham, X. Li, W. Leong and P. Chong, "Implementation Study of a Centralized Routing Protocol for Data Acquisition in Wireless Sensor Networks," Wireless Sensor Network, Vol. 3 No. 5, 2011, pp. 167-173. doi: 10.4236/wsn.2011.35019.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

[1] T. S. Rappaport, Wireless Communications: Principles and Practice 2nd Ed. Upper Saddle River, New Jersey: Prentice Hall, 2002.
[2] X. J. Li, B.-C. Seet, and P. H. J. Chong, “Multihop cellular networks: Technology and economics,” Computer Networks, Vol. 52, pp. 1825-1837, June, 2008.
[3] I. F. Akyildiz, W. Su, Y. Sankarasubramaniam, and E. Cayirci, “Wireless sensor networks: a survey,” Computer Networks, Vol. 38, pp. 393-422, 2002.
[4] H. Karl and A. Willig, Protocols and Architectures for Wireless Sensor Net-works New Jersey: Wiley, 2005.
[5] K. Akkaya and M. Younis, “A survey on routing protocols for wireless sensor networks,” Ad Hoc Networks, Vol. 3, pp. 325-349, May, 2005.
[6] J. Kulik, W. Heinzelman, and H. Balakrishnan, “Negotiation-Based Protocols for Disseminating Information in Wireless Sensor Networks,” Wireless Networks, Vol. 8, pp. 169-185, March, 2002.
[7] T. E. Cheng, R. Fonseca, S. Kim, D. Moon, A. Tavakoli, D. Culler, S. Shenker, and I. Stoica, “A modular network layer for sensornets,” in Proc. of ACM ODSI’06, pp. 249-262, Seattle, WA, 6-8 November, 2006.
[8] “http://docs.tinyos.net/index.php/Tymo.”
[9] D. Gay, P. Levis, R. v. Behren, M. Welsh, E. Brewer, and D. Culler, “The nesC language: a holistic approach to networked embedded systems,” in Proc. of ACM SIGPLAN’03, pp. 1-11, San Diego, CA, 11-13 June, 2003.
[10] P. Levis and N. Lee, “TOSSIM: A Simulator for TinyOS Networks,” 2003.

Copyright © 2021 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc.

Creative Commons License

This work and the related PDF file are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.