Anatomical Studies on Compatibility and Incompatibility of Some Solanaceous Plant Species to Field Dodder (Cuscuta campestris Yuncker)

Awad F. Farah; Samia M. Ibrahim

doi:10.4236/ajps.2014.515256

Home > Journals > Biomedical & Life Sciences > AJPS

American Journal of Plant Sciences > Vol.5 No.15, July 2014

Anatomical Studies on Compatibility and Incompatibility of Some Solanaceous Plant Species to Field Dodder (Cuscuta campestris Yuncker) ()

Awad F. Farah, Samia M. Ibrahim

Department of Biology, Faculty of Education, University of Sirt, Sirt, Libya.
Department of Science, Faculty of Education, University of Holy Quraan, Omdurman, Sudan.

DOI: 10.4236/ajps.2014.515256 PDF HTML XML 3,441 Downloads 4,654 Views Citations

Abstract

Four solanaceous plant species, namely hot pepper (Capsicum frutescensL.), potato (Solanum tuberosumL.), tobacco (Nicotiana tabacumL.) and tomato (Lycopersicon esculentumMiller) were anatomically screened for compatibility/incompatibility to field dodder (Cuscuta campestrisYuncker, Cuscutaceae). The development of field dodder haustorium within stem tissues of the studied solanaceous plants was found to depend on the latter’s response to the former’s penetration. In hot pepper and tobacco, which showed a positive response, the haustorium was well developed and its searching hyphae established connections with their vascular tissues. However, potato and tomato showed a negative response and acquired different defense mechanisms against the parasitism of field dodder. In both of them, the field dodder haustorium and/or its searching hyphae exhibited distorted appearance and failed to establish connection with their vascular tissues. Thus, the tested solanaceous plant species could be classified as either compatible (hot pepper and tobacco) or incompatible (potato and tomato) hosts to field dodder.

Keywords

Compatible or Incompatible Hosts, Field Dodder, Haustorium, Searching Hyphae, Solanaceous Plant Species

Share and Cite:

Farah, A. and Ibrahim, S. (2014) Anatomical Studies on Compatibility and Incompatibility of Some Solanaceous Plant Species to Field Dodder (Cuscuta campestris Yuncker). American Journal of Plant Sciences, 5, 2426-2430. doi: 10.4236/ajps.2014.515256.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

[1]	Dawson, J.H., Musselman, L.J., Wolswinker, P. and Dorr, I. (1994) Biology and Control of Cuscuta. Review of Weed Science, 6, 265-317.
[2]	Kuijt, J. (1969) The Biology of Parasitic Flowering Plants. University of California Press, Berkeley and Los Angles.
[3]	Kuijt, J. (1977) Haustoria of Phanerogamic Parasites. Annals Review of Phytopathology, 17, 19-11.
[4]	Kuijt, J. (1991) The Haustorial Interphase. In: Ransom, J.K., Musselman, L.J., Worsham, A.D. and Parker, C., Eds., Proceedings of the 5th International Symposium of Parasitic Weeds, CIMMT, Nairobi, 1-5.
[5]	Al-Menoufi, O.A. and Farag, S.A. (1996) Effect of Dodder (Cuscuta chinensis) on the Productivity of Some Varieties of Alfalfa (Medicago sativa). In: Moreno, M.T., Cubero, J.I., Berner, D., Joel, D., Musselman, L.J. and Parker, C., Eds., Advances in Plant Research, Proceedings of the 6th International Parasitic Weed Symposium, Cordoba, 394-398.
[6]	Arnaud, M., Renaudin, S. and Fer, A. (1996) Investigation into the Cellular and Biochemical Events Involved in the Resistance of a Legume (Phaseolus vulgaris) to a Parasitic Higher Plant (Cuscuta reflexa). In: Moreno, M.T., Cubero, J.I., Berner, D., Joel, D., Musselman, L.J. and Parker, C., Eds., Advances in Plant Research, Proceedings of the 6th International Parasitic Weeds Symposium, Cordoba, 592-596.
[7]	Dorr, I. (1987) The Haustorium of Cuscuta—New Structural Results. In: Weber, H.C. and Forsreuter, W., Eds., Parasitic Flowering Plants, Proceedings of the 4th International Symposium of Parasitic Flowering Plants, Marburg, 163-170.
[8]	Joel, D.M., Losner-Goshan, D., Hershenhorn, J., Goldwasser, Y. and Assayag, A. (1996) The Haustorium and Its Development in Compatible and Resistant Hosts. In: Moreno, M.T., Cubero, J.I., Burner, D., Joel, D., Musselman, L.J. and Parker, C., Eds., Advances in Parasitic Plants Research, Proceedings of the 6th International Parasitic Weed Symposium, Cordoba, 531-541.
[9]	Farah, A.F. and El-Hassan, G.M. (2002) Anatomical Mechanisms of Resistance to Field Dodder (Cuscuta campestris Yuncker) in Some Horticultural and Field Crops. University of Khartoum Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 1, 77-93.
[10]	Farah, A.F. (2007) Resistance of Some Plant Species to Field Dodder (Cuscuta campestris Yuncker). African Crop Science Conference Proceedings, 8, 413-417.
[11]	Farah, A.F. (2009) The Response of Two Legume Crops (Hyacinth Bean and Kidney Bean) to the Parasitism of Field Dodder (Cuscuta campestris Yuncker). In: Rubiales, D., Westwood, J. and Alugu, A., Eds., 10th World Congress on Parasitic Plants Proceedings, Kusadasi, 87.
[12]	Tsivion, Y. (1979) Morphogenetic Sequences in the Formation of the Haustorium of Cuscuta campestris. In: Musselman, L.J., Worsham, A.D. and Eplee, R.E., Eds., Proceedings of the 2nd Symposium on Parasitic Weeds, North Carolina, 174-181.
[13]	Berlynand, G.P. and Mische, J.P. (1976) Botanical Microtechnique and Cytochemistry. The Iowa State University Press, Ames.
[14]	Ihl, B. and Mierch, I. (1996) Susceptibility and Resistance of Lycopersicon to Infection by Cuscuta. In: Moreno, M.T., Cubero, J.I., Berner, D., Joel, D., Musselman, L.J. and Parker, C., Eds., Advances in Plant Research, Proceedings of the 6th International Parasitic Weeds Symposium, Cordoba, 599-605.
[15]	Loffler, C., Sahm, A., Czygan, F.C. and Proksch, P. (1996) Aspects of the Incompatible Host-Parasite Relationship of Tomato and Cuscuta. In: Moreno, M.T., Cubero, J.I., Berner, D., Joel, D., Musselman, L.J. and Parker, C., Eds., Advances in Plant Research, Proceedings of the 6th International Parasitic Weed Symposium, Cordoba, 581-598.