The Twins Clock Paradox History and Perspectives

Robert L. Shuler Jr.^*

NASA Johnson Space Center, Houston, TX, USA.

DOI: 10.4236/jmp.2014.512108                

Abstract

The twins or clock paradox has been a subject of lively discussion and occasional disagreement among both relativists and the public for over 100 years, and continues to attract physicists who write papers giving new analyses or defending old ones, even though many physicists now consider the matter only of educational interest. This paper investigates the number of papers, which is increasing, and trends in explanations, some of which are now targeted at professional physicists and other of which are targeted at optical or radar visualization rather than problem solving. Observations of students indicate that the latest techniques help but only somewhat. An analysis is made of 21 previous treatments appearing in the education related American Journal of Physics, Einstein’s discussions and several other pedagogical papers. A new memory aid for simultaneity transformation is given that puts it on a par with “time dilation” and “length contraction” for quick and easy problem visualization. The point of view of a trailing twin is introduced to show how simultaneity changes account for missing time in the turnaround. Length contraction is treated on equal footing with time dilation, and Swann’s insight into clocks is extended to lengths. Treatments using the conventionality of simultaneity are seen as equivalent to choice of co-moving frames. Responses to difficult questions are suggested which avoid being dismissive, and engage students’ critical thinking.

Keywords

Clock Paradox, Length Contraction, Simultaneity, Special Relativity, Time Dilation, Twins Paradox

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

[1]	Abramowicz, M.A. and Bajtlik, S. (2009) Adding to the Paradox: The Accelerated Twin Is Older. arXiv:0905.2428 http://arxiv.org/abs/0905.2428
[2]	Einstein, A. (1905) Annalen der Physik, 322, 891-921. https://www.fourmilab.ch/etexts/einstein/specrel/www/
[3]	Swann, W.F.G. (1960) American Journal of Physics, 28, 55. http://scitation.aip.org/content/aapt/journal/ajp/28/1/10.1119/1.1934976
[4]	Swann, W.F.G. (1960) American Journal of Physics, 28, 319-323. http://scitation.aip.org/content/aapt/journal/ajp/28/4/10.1119/1.1935795
[5]	Taylor, E. (2003) American Journal of Physics, 71, 423. http://dx.doi.org/10.1119/1.1555874
[6]	Einstein, A. (2002) The Collected Papers of Albert Einstein, Volume 7: The Berlin Years: Writings, 1918-1921. (English Translation of Selected Texts). Princeton University Press, Princeton.
[7]	Unnikrishnan, C.S. (2005) Current Science, 89, 2009-2015. http://www.iisc.ernet.in/currsci/dec252005/2009.pdf
[8]	Frye, R. and Brigham, V. (1957) American Journal of Physics, 25, 553. http://dx.doi.org/10.1119/1.1934547
[9]	Scott, G. (1959) American Journal of Physics, 27, 580. http://dx.doi.org/10.1119/1.1934918
[10]	Romer, R. (1959) American Journal of Physics, 27, 131. http://dx.doi.org/10.1119/1.1934783
[11]	Muller, R. (1972) American Journal of Physics, 40, 966. http://dx.doi.org/10.1119/1.1986722
[12]	Perrin, R. (1979) American Journal of Physics, 47, 317. http://dx.doi.org/10.1119/1.11835
[13]	Staunton, L. and van Dam, H. (1980) American Journal of Physics, 48, 807. http://dx.doi.org/10.1119/1.12229
[14]	Unruh, W.G. (1981) American Journal of Physics, 49, 589.
[15]	Good, R. (1982) American Journal of Physics, 50, 232. http://dx.doi.org/10.1119/1.12862
[16]	Bohm, D. and Hiley, B. (1985) American Journal of Physics, 53, 720. http://dx.doi.org/10.1119/1.14300
[17]	Blatter, H. and Greber, T. (1988) American Journal of Physics, 56, 333. http://dx.doi.org/10.1119/1.15633
[18]	Boughn, S. (1989) American Journal of Physics, 57, 791. http://dx.doi.org/10.1119/1.15894
[19]	Debs, T. and Redhead, M. (1996) American Journal of Physics, 64, 384. http://dx.doi.org/10.1119/1.18252
[20]	Price, R. and Gruber, R. (1996) American Journal of Physics, 64, 1006. http://dx.doi.org/10.1119/1.18318
[21]	Gruber, R. and Price, R. (1997) American Journal of Physics, 65, 979. http://dx.doi.org/10.1119/1.18700
[22]	Cranor, M., Heider, E. and Price, R. (2000) American Journal of Physics, 68, 1016. http://dx.doi.org/10.1119/1.1286313
[23]	Dolby, C. and Gull, S. (2001) American Journal of Physics, 69, 1257. http://dx.doi.org/10.1119/1.1407254
[24]	Eagle, A. (2005) American Journal of Physics, 73, 976. http://dx.doi.org/10.1119/1.1994855
[25]	Minguzzi, E. (2005) American Journal of Physics, 73, 876. http://dx.doi.org/10.1119/1.1924490
[26]	Styer, D. (2007) American Journal of Physics, 75, 805. http://dx.doi.org/10.1119/1.2733691
[27]	Müller, T., King, A. and Adis, D. (2008) American Journal of Physics, 76, 360. http://dx.doi.org/10.1119/1.2830528
[28]	Cormier, S. and Steinberg, R. (2010) The Physics Teacher, 48, 598. http://dx.doi.org/10.1119/1.3517026
[29]	McDermott, L. and Shaffer, P. (2001) Tutorials in Introductory Physics. Prentice Hall College Div., Upper Saddle River.
[30]	Scherr, R., Shaffer, P. and Vokos, S. (2002) American Journal of Physics, 70, 1238-1248.
[31]	Bell, J.S. (1976) How to Teach Special Relativity. Progress in Scientific Culture, 1, 2. (Reprinted in Bell 1987) http://philpapers.org/rec/BELHTT
[32]	Good, R. (1968) Basic Concepts of Relativity. Reinhold Book Corporation, NY.
[33]	Petkov, V. (2007) Foundations of Physics, 37, 1499-1502. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10701-007-9178-9
[34]	Dewan, E. and Beran, M. (1959) American Journal of Physics, 27, 517-518. http://dx.doi.org/10.1119/1.1996214
[35]	Petkov, V. (2009) Accelerating Spaceships Paradox and Physical Meaning of Length Contraction. arXiv:0903.5128 http://arxiv.org/abs/0903.5128
[36]	Dieks, D. (1984) Foundations of Physics, 15, 330-342. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF01801366.